史铁生的散文选集安乐死断想中的优秀的句子
史铁生的散文集有：1 1981年 秋天的怀念 2 1985年 合欢树 3 1989年 文革记愧 4 1990年 好运设计 5 1991年 我与地坛 6 1991年 我二十一岁那年 7 1992年 黄土地情歌 8 1992年 相逢何必曾相识 9 1992年 散文三篇 10 1992年 随笔十三 11 2002年 病隙碎笔 12 2004年 记忆与印象 13 2010年 扶轮问路 14 2010年 妄想电影 史铁生(1951年1月4日-2010年12月31日)，中国作家、散文家。
1951年出生于北京。
1967年毕业于清华大学附属中学，1969年去延安一带插队。
因双腿瘫痪于1972年回到北京。
后来又患肾病并发展到尿毒症，靠着每周3次透析维持生命。
后历任中国作家协会全国委员会委员，北京作家协会副主席，中国残疾人联合会副主席。
自称职业是生病，业余在写作。
2010年12月31日凌晨3时46分因突发脑溢血逝世，享年59岁。
关于反对安乐死的英语资料
我天外教课期末考试辩论好是这个，这的辩论素材Euthanasia is to kill people. Life is so important for every one. People don’t only live for themselves, but they also live for their families and the society. If they choose to leave the world, they are not responsible for themselves, their families and the society. Euthanasia is disparagement of life. Life is so precious. Patients should cherish their life. They should try their best to prevail incurable disease. Everyone should show basic respect for life. No matter what happens, we should face up to the facts, we should live on with great courage, we should believe in wonder. Nothing is impossible. Euthanasia stops the medicine developing. If the patients require using euthanasia, doctors won’t try their best to save patients. The medicine will stop progress. If making euthanasia is made legal, patients who use euthanasia will be protected by law. The doctors’ right will be obvious. Doctors are given too much power, and can be wrong or unethical. Patients put their faith and trust in the opinions of their doctor.people abuse euthanasia when it is legalized, it can harm people lives. In the name of euthanasia, carry out committing suicide. Miracle cures or recoveries can occur. You can never underestimate the power of the human spirit.It demeans the value of human life. In this country, human life means something.It could open the floodgates to non-critical patient suicides and other abuses. Any loosening of the assisted-suicide laws could eventually lead to abuses of the privilege.Many religions prohibit suicide and the intentional killing of others. The most basic commandment is You shall not kill.Insurance companies may put undue pressure on doctors to avoid heroic measures or recommend the assisted-suicide procedure. Health insurance providers are under tremendous pressure to keep premiums down.Euthanasia can become a means of health care cost containment..Physicians and other medical care people should not be involved in directly causing death.Mercy killing is morally incorrect and should be forbidden by law.It's a homicide and murdering another human cannot be rationalized under any circumstances.Human life deserves exceptional security and protection. Advanced medical technology has made it possible to enhance human life span and quality of life. Palliative care and rehabilitation centers are better alternatives to help disabled or patients approaching death live a pain-free and better life.Family members influencing the patient's decision into euthanasia for personal gains like wealth inheritance is another issue. There is no way you can be really sure if the decision towards assisted suicide is voluntary or forced by others.Mercy killing would cause decline in medical care and cause victimization of the most vulnerable society. Would mercy killing transform itself from the right to die to right to kill?How would one assess whether a disorder of mental nature qualifies mercy killing? What if the pain threshold is below optimum and the patient perceives the circumstances to be not worthy of living? How would one know whether the wish to die is the result of unbalanced thought process or a logical decision in mentally ill patients? What if the individual chooses assisted suicide as an option and the family wouldn't agree?As to face the parting, helplessness, loss of self-control, fear of death and sorrow and so the majority of patients will experience mental suffering. In this psychological requirement under the Euthanasia, we can say that he is reasonable? According to the study of suicide, suicide and treatable mental illness is intrinsically related, but not the fatal disease, a study found that in 44 patients with advanced cancer, only three thought about suicide, but are there is a serious depression. Another study shows that 85 suicides, only one person suffering from terminal illness, and 90-100% of the suicides were suffering from obvious mental illness. Undeniably, the modern medical practice slow death process, often cited the loss of personal characteristics of patients Mei, dignity, independence and autonomy. However, the expression of active euthanasia as acts of personal autonomy, it is wrong. Reasons: (a) Since active euthanasia need help, then it is not an individual matter, but the open or in the public thing. (B) under the public recognition to self-defense, capital punishment and justice in the form of war, murder, only to defend the life for everyone, not to the benefit of those killed. So, even if death is painful relief, can not be lightly taken away the right to life committed to personal. (C) even if the person's self-determination recognized the right to choose to die, that does not mean the right to ask others to kill themselves, does not include the right to authorize self to kill others. (D) autonomy, including the right of slavery has never been their own, in other words, the right to freedom does not mean the right not to freedom. So to maintain the autonomy, the need to protect life, to give others their right to life is not trampling the principle of maintaining independence. Therefore, individual autonomy and social need and public objectives and values to be consistent. active euthanasia may gradually lose its spontaneity, and thus out of (i) secret euthanasia, meaning that without their own consent, to be a doctor euthanized. (Ii) forced euthanasia, meaning patients suffering from terminal illness would be coercion to lure choose euthanasia to relieve their families in the economic and psychological pressures, and save limited resources of society, the patients chose to die, do not feel life is a burden or tired of life, but he felt the burden of someone else, and that others dislike. (Iii) Deputy euthanasia means to allow patients who lack capacity to self-determination by the people proxy decision to euthanasia. (Iv) Discrimination against euthanasia, the crisis is the number of types of patients such as the poverty stricken or belonging to ethnic minorities, may be clever to force that euthanasia requirement, the mercy of others. Made ill patients caught in the dilemma of both the opposition between the yield, resulting in additional unnecessary fear and anxiety. The information may be heard: Death is terrible! Your best choice of euthanasia. of the slip waves, is once the euthanasia is legalized, its use will inevitably extend to other types of patients but not the dying, if not cure patients, but not incurable disease, then the risk of Alzheimer's disease or brain degradation, even those born with severe disabilities Down syndrome baby. . And so on. So, if this argument, once established, will only create panic and fear that they will be forcibly sent to euthanasia in the ranks. Therefore, I agree Frasen say, human life, merely the possibility of error, is enough to completely reject the euthanasia.
求一篇关于安乐死的英文作文
What shall we do to a person when he is seriously iii and the hope of his keeping alive is very slight? Should we try every means to prolong his life in agony or should we just stop trying to do nothing useful and inject some kind of drugs into his body so that this person may no longer suffer? Drug killing in this case is what is called Euthanasia, or mercy killing.Different people have different attitudes towards euthanasia. Some are of the opinion that euthanasia is necessary because it can relieve the fatally sick patient from both physical and psychological torture. Practicing this can save the other family members, relatives, and friends from the pain of having to witness torture that the patient does not otherwise need to bear from certain incurable illnesses. However, certain other people may argue that euthanasia is not a cure but a murder.I am inclined to be strongly supportive on the practice of euthanasia. For one thing, it is meaningless to spend money on a patient that is definitely hopeless. Human beings, like everything living in this world, are mortal. No one can avoid death. In cases of serious diseases that go beyond the knowledge and skills of doctors, no one can help no matter what his family members try to de. For another, fatally sick patients usually need expensive medicines and intensive treatment. This means they are wasting medical resources that can reasonably be used on patients who really need them to recover. Lastly, some patients themselves do not want to suffer from the pain if they know that they are not curable. To conclude, I think practicing euthanasia is necessary, and legislative organizations should pass laws on it so that nothing more should be wasted on those who can not be saved.翻译:我们应怎样一个人时，他正在认真三和他保持活着的希望是微乎其微
我们应千方百计延长他的痛苦生活，还是应该只停留在做什么有益的，他的身体注入一些药物，使此人可能不再受苦
药物在这种情况下杀人是所谓的“安乐死”，或安乐死。
不同的人对安乐死有不同的态度。
有些人认为，安乐死是必要的，因为它可以减轻从生理和心理的致命病病人的酷刑。
实践这可以节省其他家庭成员，亲属，并从有痛苦的朋友见证酷刑，病人没有其他需要承受一定的不可治愈的疾病。
然而，某些人会说，安乐死是不治本，而是谋杀。
我倾向于要加强对实施安乐死的支持。
一方面，是没有意义的花病人的钱是绝对没有希望的。
人类一样，在这个世界上的一切生活，都是致命的。
没有人能避免死亡。
在重大疾病案件，超出了医生的知识和技能，没有人能帮助不管他的家人试图超越。
其次，致命的病病人通常需要昂贵的药品和强化治疗。
这意味着他们是在浪费可以合理的病人谁真正需要他们的医疗资源回收利用。
最后，有些病人自己也不想遭受的痛苦，如果他们知道，他们无法治愈的。
最后，我觉得练安乐死是必要的，立法机构应该通过法律，它没有什么更多的应该是谁浪费在那些无法保存。
辩论里怎么反驳不支持安乐死的论点
1，恰恰相反，安乐死是让人有希望，让人有解脱痛苦，来去自由的希望。
难道对方辩友认为在无边无际的痛苦深渊中挣扎才叫做有希望么
2，无论病人是由于哪种心理，但生理上的痛苦是实实在在的，如果不是生理上的极大痛苦也不会选择安乐死。
而且生理上的痛苦和绝望也可以由医生用专业科学手段来确诊。
3，第三条直接反问他：“认定过程有多复杂
为什么导致很多人死，请说出个所以然来。
”--他一定说不出有多复杂，你就臭他：“对方辩友准备中难道都没有了解安乐死的认定过程么
这也太不认真了吧。
”--等他回完话继续抽他：“对方辩友既然都没有认真了解安乐死过程，又怎么得出很多人会死的结论呢
这些人难道都是给对方辩友你说死就死的么
”
用生于安乐死与忧患这句话写一篇议论文
居安，思则有备。
有备则必然也有患无远虑，必忧.可人有了远虑，又何尝不是必有近忧呢
古人倡导的“生于忧患”以被几百年后的现代人发挥的淋漓尽致，可一味“忧患”的结果却是我们的一事无成.是啊，要想安乐死就不能再忧患生了
根据空气动力学原理，大黄蜂很可能是飞不起来的，可它们自己不知道这一点，也不忧虑，所以它飞起来了.这就是无知者无畏.而成天闷闷不乐的忧患者，渐渐的被生活所消磨，对未来失去了信心.试问“安心”都做不到，又如何能做到“安乐”
放不下心灵包袱的人被羁绊住的也许不仅仅是双脚，还有未来吧
有这样的一个人，当他走在一大片冰冻的河面上时，他听见了“咔咔”的响声.他吓坏了，他以为冰面要裂开了所以趴在冰面上不敢动弹.当一辆满载货物的马车驶过他身边时，他的眼神变的很迷茫.是啊，这就是“过度忧患综合症”的表现.还有一个有趣的现象就是现在的社会，被自己吓倒的人数要远远超过被困难打倒的人，是啊，“自己才是自己最大的敌人”，这就是真正的原因吧.而罪魁祸首正是那个叫做“生于忧患”的理念. 放下你那装满“忧虑”的包袱吧，只有轻装上阵才能获得成功.生活是过出来的，而不是想出来的.相信人生只有走出来的美丽，没有想出来的辉煌.就像文才是写出来的，口才是练出来的，而不是忧虑出来的，想出来的一样.即使是失败的经验也一定比事先无尽的忧虑要来得实在，只要你有输的起的精神就一定会赢来新的机遇，就会成功.而忧虑只能让你踌躇不前，在梦想门前却要徘徊的人，注定要和梦想相隔，在河的这一边把自己站成岸.但即使你面对的阻碍无法超越，即使你没有好的应对方法，但只要你有敢于面对强敌的勇气，你就会发现奇迹是可以创造的. “车到山前必有路”不一定只是那些事到临头却一无准备之人的开脱之词，“机关算尽”也不一定是好事，有时候我们反而要适当的“头脑简单”到那时你会发现春履与秋痕一样是美好的景色，固然要死的安乐，但人活着不是为了死.是不是安乐的度过医生才更有意义呢
形容一个将死之人厌倦世间的句子和网名
这个激进的举措起先只是一个单词，其范围在率先将安乐死合法化的国家中不断扩大。
在一个医生收集到支持安乐死的112500个签名后，荷兰政府将要讨论其施行方法。
我写的韩语论文，主题是安乐死。
这是个开头，200个字，高手进来瞅瞅呗
哇咔咔
