题目为《信仰》的演讲稿
信仰是一个人的精神内核，是支撑人坚定走下去的动力源泉。
一个有信仰的人是一个有追求的人，时刻哟种无形的力量支撑着他往前走，即使身体离岗，精神永不离岗。
张海迪阿姨就是一个最好的例子。
5岁时，因病半身瘫痪，不能上学，但是对生命的渴望，对生活的热爱，使她在困难面前永不服输。
终于经历种种磨难，自学完成了多种语言，并创作出版了许多书籍，成了国内外有名的残疾人作家。
我们的革命战士，为了新中国的成立抛头颅洒热血，面对敌人的威逼利诱，面对敌人的严刑拷打，面对死亡，义无返顾，勇往直前，这就是因为他们心中有自己的信仰，有自己认为可以用生命去为之奋斗的东西，这就是信仰的力量。
人的胜利，不见得属于强者，但或迟或早，那相信自己能成功的人必能成功。
有了信仰，前方的路就不会再迷茫;有了信仰，前进的路中就不会再孤单;有了信仰，就有了翅膀，坚定得向着未来飞翔……
关于青春和信仰的演讲稿
每个人的一生都有必须做地三件事：吃喝，睡觉，上厕所。
作为一个人这都是必需的，但如果是一直只有这些事，只会使我们变成行尸走肉。
人吗，应当有追求，更应该有原则，换句话说，一个人需要理想和信仰。
在中华五千年的历史中，没有哪一个团体比我们的党的理想更远大，没有哪一个组织的成员比我们的党员信仰更坚定，所以没有哪一个团队比中国共产党更成功。
党章中就有我们的党信仰的文字化描述：中国共产党是工人阶级的先锋队，是中国各族人民利益的忠实代表，是中国社会主义事业的领导核心；对理想的描述是实现共同富裕，也就是国家富强。
有了这种理想与信仰中国共产党才能由弱变强，进而主宰中国现代的历史。
转而说个人，也是这个道理。
信仰与理想的作用也是不可估量的，它们是人生之舟的帆和舵.有了它们,一个人才能称之为人,一个人才能让有限的生命迸发出无限的能量,为世界增添一点亮色.世界上有很多这样的例子,像领导各国人民摆脱民族压迫的的领袖们,像让黑人获得权利的马丁.路德.金,以及在各个领域都有卓越建树的成功人士,毫无例外的,他们都有坚定的信仰与远大的理想,所以作为未来承担历史任务的主体大学生我们更应该拥有远大的理想和找到坚定的信仰世界上没有完全一样的两个人,但理想是可以共有的,信仰也是可以分享的.如果我们中的某些人志同道合,那是再还不过了,因为那不是简单的代数相加而是可能会发生质的变化,将不可能化为可能.关于怎样树立理想与找到坚定的信仰,作为社会主义接班人的我们的个人理想无疑要服从国家理想,我们的信仰也要服从马列主义.在不于国家理想矛盾的情况下,树立自己的的理想;根据马列主义找到自己的信仰.只有这样我们才不会被历史潮流淹没,成为祖国的罪人.具体细节方面因人而异,但大的方向不能错.
需要关于信仰的演讲稿
1.正确的人生信仰是对真理的领悟，是对生命、自然、社会的感恩，是对生命、自然、宇宙和自然与社会法则的敬畏，是有益于国家、社会和人民的人生意义，是具有正义感、崇高感和使命感的人生信念，是对真（真理）、善（善良）、美（美好）的人生追求，是超越一己私欲、胸怀天下的精神境界。
正确的人生信仰是一根脊梁，支撑着一个不倒的灵魂，支撑着人生的大厦；正确的人生信仰是一盏明灯，照亮着一个期盼的心灵，照亮着人生的殿堂；正确的人生信仰是一个路标，指引着一个前进的方向，指引着人生的道路。
正确的人生信仰是一股力量，能锻造出一个强大的内心，让人拥有宽广的胸怀。
2.信仰是人们对生活所持的某些长期的和必须加以捍卫的根本信念。
不管科学技术发展到何等程度，人的有限性是不会改变的，虽然我们知道的比2000年前的人们多得多，随着知识的增加，在一些问题的认识上获得了进展，但一些新的困惑又会产生，而在有些问题上，比如在死亡所引起的恐惧这一人生终极问题上，则几乎没有取得进展。
人类在欲知和未知、在有限和无限之间的鸿沟，与他们的祖先相比，缩小的幅度可能远没有想象的那么大。
在这道鸿沟里，既生出希望，也生出恐惧，这就给信仰留出了地盘。
人类永远需要信仰，要依靠信仰尽力拉近有限和无限的距离。
因此信仰和人们一般所说的信念有所不同。
信仰回答的是人生日常关切最有深度的方面。
信仰的对象也是崇拜的对象，在人类经验领域内的万事万物，一切无不是有限的，也只有有限的价值，这些只具有有限价值的事物很难作为信仰对象。
信仰是为了超越，超越一切有限，惟有超越现实的无限才能真正成为弥补人自身局限性的希望。
信仰的力量英文演讲稿
说实话我是COPY的.你看看能不能用把.A religion is a system of human thought which usually includes a set of narratives, symbols, beliefs and practices that give meaning to the practitioner's experiences of life through reference to a higher power, deity or deities, or ultimate truth.[1] Religion is commonly identified by the practitioner's prayer, ritual, meditation, music and art, among other things, and is often interwoven with society and politics. It may focus on specific supernatural, metaphysical, and moral claims about reality (the cosmos and human nature) which may yield a set of religious laws, ethics, and a particular lifestyle. Religion also encompasses ancestral or cultural traditions, writings, history, and mythology, as well as personal faith and religious experience.The term religion refers to both the personal practices related to communal faith and to group rituals and communication stemming from shared conviction. Religion is sometimes used interchangeably with faith or belief system,[2] but it is more socially defined than personal convictions, and it entails specific behaviors, respectively.In the frame of western religious thought,[3] religions present a common quality, the hallmark of patriarchal religious thought: the division of the world in two comprehensive domains, one sacred, the other profane.[4] According to the futurist Raymond Kurzweil, The primary role of traditional religion is deathist rationalization—that is, rationalizing the tragedy of death as a good thing.[5] Religion is often described as a communal system for the coherence of belief focusing on a system of thought, unseen being, person, or object, that is considered to be supernatural, sacred, divine, or of the highest truth. Moral codes, practices, values, institutions, tradition, rituals, and scriptures are often traditionally associated with the core belief, and these may have some overlap with concepts in secular philosophy. Religion is also often described as a way of life or a life stance Religion and the body politicA good understanding of the meaning of Christianity before the word religion came into common usage can be found in St. Augustine's writing. For Augustine, Christianity was a disciplina, a rule just like that of the Roman Empire. Christianity was therefore a power structure opposing and superseding human institutions, a literal Kingdom of Heaven. Rather than calling one to self-discipline through symbols, it was itself the discipline taught by one's family, school, church, and city authorities.[11] However at this point the root of the English word religion, the Latin religio, was in use only to mean reverence for God or the gods, careful pondering of divine things, piety (which Cicero further derived to mean diligence[12]); in other words, there was no sense of a system nor even of the Christian power structure but only of spirituality.[13] Max Müller characterized many other cultures around the world, including Egypt, Persia, and India, as having a similar power structure at this point in history. What we would call religion today, they would only call law.[14]As Christianity became commonplace, the charismatic authority identified by Augustine, a quality we might today call religiousness, had a commanding influence at the local level. This system persisted in the Byzantine Empire following the East-West Schism, while Western Europe regulated unpredictable expressions of charisma through the Roman Catholic Church. However, as the Church lost its dominance during the Protestant Reformation and Christianity became closely tied to political structures, religion was recast as the basis of national sovereignty, and religious identity gradually became a less universal sense of spirituality and more divisive, locally defined, and tied to nationality.[15] It was at this point that religion was dissociated with universal beliefs and moved closer to dogma in both meaning and practice. However there was not yet the idea of dogma as personal choice, only of established churches.Religious freedomIn the Age of Enlightenment, the idea of Christianity as the purest expression of spirituality was supplanted by the concept of religion as a worldwide practice.[16] This caused such ideas as religious freedom, a reexamination of classical philosophy as an alternative to Christian thought, and more radically Deism among intellectuals such as Voltaire. Much like Christianity, the idea of religious freedom was exported around the world as a civilizing technique, even to regions like India that had never treated spirituality as a matter of political identity.[17] In Japan, where Buddhism was still seen as a philosophy of natural law,[18] the concept of religion and religious freedom as separate from other power structures was unnecessary until Christian missionaries demanded free access to conversion, and when Japanese Christians refused to engage in patriotic events.[19]With the Enlightenment religion lost its attachment to nationality, but rather than being a universal social attitude, it was now a personal feeling, or emotion.[20] Friedrich Schleiermacher in the late 18th century defined religion as das schlechthinnige Abhängigkeitsgefühl, commonly translated as a feeling of absolute dependence.[21] His contemporary Hegel disagreed thoroughly, defining religion as the Divine Spirit becoming conscious of Himself through the finite spirit.[22] William James is an especially notable 19th century subscriber to the theory of religion as feeling.Confucianism, Taoism, and Buddhism are one, a painting in the litang style portraying three men laughing by a river stream, 12th century, Song DynastyModern currents in religionReligious studiesWith the recognition of religion as a category separate from culture and society came the rise of religious studies. Clifford Geertz's definition of religion as a cultural system was dominant for most of the 20th century and continues to be widely accepted today.Sociologists and anthropologists tend to see religion as an abstract set of ideas, values, or experiences developed as part of a cultural matrix. For example, in Lindbeck's Nature of Doctrine, religion does not refer to belief in God or a transcendent Absolute. Instead, Lindbeck defines religion as, a kind of cultural and\\\/or linguistic framework or medium that shapes the entirety of life and thought… it is similar to an idiom that makes possible the description of realities, the formulation of beliefs, and the experiencing of inner attitudes, feelings, and sentiments.”[23] According to this definition, religion refers to one's primary worldview and how this dictates one's thoughts and actions. Thus religion is considered by some sources to extend to causes, principles, or activities believed in with zeal or conscientious devotion concerning points or matters of ethics or conscience, and not necessarily including belief in the supernatural.[24]Although evolutionists had previously sought to understand and explain religion in terms of a cultural attribute which might conceivably confer biological advantages to its adherents, Richard Dawkins called for a re-analysis of religion in terms of the evolution of self-replicating ideas apart from any resulting biological advantages they might bestow. He argued that the role of key replicator in cultural evolution belongs not to genes, but to memes replicating thought from person to person by means of imitation. These replicators respond to selective pressures that may or may not affect biological reproduction or survival.[25] Susan Blackmore regards religions as particularly tenacious memes.[26] Chris Hedges, however, regards meme theory as a misleading imposition of genetics onto psychology.Interfaith cooperationBecause religion continues to be recognized in Western thought as a universal impulse, many religious practitioners have aimed to band together in interfaith dialogue and cooperation. The first major dialogue was the Parliament of the World's Religions at the 1893 Chicago World's Fair, which remains notable even today both in affirming universal values and recognition of the diversity of practices among different cultures. The 20th century has been especially fruitful in use of interfaith dialogue as a means of solving ethnic, political, or even religious conflict, with Christian-Jewish reconciliation representing a complete reverse in the attitudes of many Christian communities towards Jews.Secularism and criticism of religionMain articles: Criticism of religion, Antireligion, Secularism, Agnosticism, and AtheismAs religion became a more personal matter, discussions of society found a new focus on political and scientific meaning, and religious attitudes were increasingly seen as irrelevant for the needs of the European world. On the political side, Ludwig Feuerbach recast Christian beliefs in light of humanism, paving the way for Karl Marx's famous characterization of religion as the opiate of the masses. Meanwhile, in the scientific community, T.H. Huxley in 1869 coined the term agnostic, a term subsequently adopted by such figures as Robert Ingersoll. Later, Bertrand Russell told the world Why I Am Not a Christian.Atheists have developed a critique of religious systems as well as personal faith. Modern-day critics focus on religion's lack of utility in human society, faulting religion as being irrational.[27] Some assert that dogmatic religions are in effect morally deficient, elevating to moral status ancient, arbitrary, and ill-informed rules—taboos on eating pork, for example, as well as dress codes and sexual practices[28]—possibly designed for reasons of hygiene or even mere politics in a bygone era.In North America and Western Europe the social fallout of the 9\\\/11 attacks contributed in part to the appearance of numerous pro-secularist books, such as The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins, The End of Faith by Sam Harris, and God is not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything by Christopher Hitchens. This criticism is largely, but not entirely, focused on the monotheistic Abrahamic traditions.Religious beliefCentral Asian (Tocharian) and East-Asian Buddhist monks, Bezeklik, Eastern Tarim Basin, 9th-10th centuryMain article: Religious beliefReligious belief usually relates to the existence, nature and worship of a deity or deities and divine involvement in the universe and human life. Alternately, it may also relate to values and practices transmitted by a spiritual leader. Unlike other belief systems, which may be passed on orally, religious belief tends to be codified in literate societies (religion in non-literate societies is still largely passed on orally[29]). In some religions, like the Abrahamic religions, it is held that most of the core beliefs have been divinely revealed.Religious belief can also involve causes, principles or activities believed in with zeal or conscientious devotion concerning points or matters of ethics or conscience, not necessarily limited to organized religions
求有关于“信仰”的演讲稿大约4分钟之内的
急急急
继萨马兰奇雄浑的宣告声之后四年，即 2005年6月26日，在北京工人体育馆举行的发布仪式上，北京奥组委宣布“同一个世界、同一个梦想” （One world、One dream）成为北京2008年奥运会中英文主题口号。
这个口号的诞生，使一直沉浸在喜悦中的中华民族发出了无数的感慨。
当然，多数的人是积极拥戴的，但不免有些愤世嫉俗的人激动地发出一些尖刻的嘲讽。
譬如网站”上海热线”就有人这么说” 笑话，布什和拉登同在一世界，不做同一个梦。
”” 社会主义和资本主义永远不会做同一个梦。
不要自欺欺人啦
” 之所以认为他们是思想偏激，主要还是因为我对这个口号的理解。
”同一个世界，同一个梦想”，众所周知，在目前世界这个大领域之内根本就不存在共同的梦想，至少有些人”另类”的想法就无法实现”同一个梦想”。
虽然它不能代表事实，但它又何尝不象征着一种美好的愿望呢
我相信，正常的人们都希望自己，也包括自己的亲朋好友们都幸福。
既然想得到幸福，一个最最基本的前提就应该是有一个安稳的环境。
因为谁也不会愿意身处狂乱的战火之中，谁都受不了周围全是没人管的作奸犯科之人。
一个动荡的社会所造成的危害应该不仅仅是使无数的人伤心，甚至是令无数的家庭破亡。
这就决定了人们一个统一的心愿----和平。
这也便是同一个梦想了。
信仰，我的理解是梦想的升华。
毕竟梦想只是局限于”想”，而信仰，却是一种催人奋进的东西，是”想””行动”与”坚持”的多重结合体。
文珠法师说过，”古今中外，一切英雄豪杰，能够面对现实，克制困难，完成人生责任，固然依赖信仰力量；而历代高僧，所以能化愚昧为智慧，化迷惑为清醒，甚至明心见性，成圣成贤，亦全靠坚固不移的信心。
故古人说：信仰就是力量。
”华严经言：‘信为道源功德母，长养一切诸善根’，心地观经亦言：‘法宝甘露妙良药，能治一切烦恼病，有信服药证菩提，无信随缘堕恶道。
’可知信仰的重要。
但信仰一定要正信，真信，诚信，而非迷信，邪信，或莫棱两可的信
“同一个梦想”，是多么纯洁，无任何瑕疵的人类的愿望。
这个主题口号文简意深，既是中国的，也是世界的。
主题口号表达了中国人民与世界各国人民共有美好家园，同享文明成果，携手共创未来的崇高理想；表达了一个拥有五千年文明，正在大步走向现代化的伟大民族致力于和平发展、社会和谐、人民幸福的坚定愿望；表达中国人民为建立一个和平而更美好的世界做出贡献的心声。
在理解它的寓意之后，我们还应该把它升级为一种信仰，创造出力量去实现这个梦想。
因此，无论怎样，坚定我们心中的这个信仰，为我们共同的世界创造美好的明天努力吧
向日葵永远望着蓝天，和煦的阳光是它的信仰藤蔓不懈向上攀爬，粗壮的树干是它的信仰溪流淌过雪地平原，大海是它的信仰。
信仰让我们执着，让我们勇敢，让我们体会奋斗，懂得追求。
执着着，勇敢着奋斗着――为了我们的信仰。
――题记 午后的阳光懒散地洒落在无人的公园中，只有花儿在那炫耀娇容。
红的花热情，黄的花活泼，白的花纯洁，紫的花高贵，泼泼洒洒，姹紫嫣红，正你争我抢，开得灿烂，它们摆着高傲的头与风儿嬉戏，这时飞来了几只蝴蝶，轻轻地扇动着翅膀，款款落在簇簇拥拥的花群上，蜜蜂也嘤嘤翁翁地歌唱。
这大概就是花儿的信仰吧
为了莺歌燕舞，为了蝴蝶蜜蜂，美丽的开放，骄傲的凋零。
那拥抱着繁花的绿叶，它们的信仰是什么
莺歌焉舞
蝴蝶蜜蜂
不
都不是，它们的存在仅仅只为了用那葱郁的绿去衬托繁花的艳丽夺目。
它们为了花儿的信仰而绿着，也许，看着花儿在阳光下幸福的微笑足够了。
――繁花是绿叶唯一的信仰
为了自己的信仰，它总是去衬托，去奉献，那些绿可以证明一切
它是不会后悔的，它是幸福的，因为，它明白自己信仰着什么，所以，它追求，它奋斗，它执着，它勇敢，那一点点微不足道的辛酸无助又算什么
秋天来了，大地被死寂的枯黄色笼罩着，苍穹中偶尔掠过几声候鸟南归的哀鸣。
花儿不在拥有艳丽的色彩，一切都离它而去：蝴蝶不在为它起舞，黄莺不在为它歌唱，所有的浮华被岁月不留痕迹的带走，成为永远的过去。
谁也逃不了宿命的折磨，花儿和绿叶一起，将要被土地抽干血液。
可绿叶依然将自己的养料送给花儿。
它从没放弃信仰――无论春夏秋冬，沧海桑田，只要它是叶，就会为花付出一切，永不停息…… 终于，绿叶与花一同被冬天的雪埋没了，变成第2年的新泥。
又有花开了，叶绿了，依然为他们的信仰奋斗着：花儿依旧向往莺歌燕舞，绿叶依旧衬托花儿。
年复一年…… 执着，勇敢，奋斗，追求， ――为了我们的信仰
