求一份中文模拟联合国大会的发言稿 时长五分钟 议题:反恐怖袭击 国家：新加坡 大神求助啊
60\\\/288. 联合国全球反恐战略 大会， 依循《联合国宪章》的宗旨和原则，重申大会按照《宪章》应该发挥的作用，包括在与国际和平与安全有关的问题上的作用， 再次强烈谴责一切形式和表现的恐怖主义，无论其为何人所为，在何处发生，为何目的而为，因为它是对国际和平与安全的最严重威胁之一， 重申1994 年 12 月 9 日大会第 49\\\/60 号决议附件所载的《消除国际恐怖主义措施宣言》、1996 年 12 月 17 日大会第 51\\\/210 号决议附件所载的《补充 1994 年消除国际恐怖主义措施宣言的宣言》和《2005 年世界首脑会议成果》，特别是成果文件中有关恐怖主义的一节，回顾大会关于消除国际恐怖主义的措施的所有决议，包括 1991 年 12 月 9 日第 46\\\/51 号决议，安全理事会关于恐怖行为对国际和平与安全造成威胁的各项决议，以及大会关于在反恐的同时保护人权和基本自由的各项有关决议， 又回顾世界领导人在《2005 年世界首脑会议成果》中再次表示决心支持作出一切努力，维护所有国家的主权平等，尊重其领土完整和政治独立，在国际关系中不以不符合联合国宗旨和原则的任何方式进行武力威胁或使用武力，坚持以和平手段并按照正义和国际法原则解决争端，尊重仍处于殖民统治或外国占领下的人民的自决权利，不干涉各国的内政，尊重人权和各项基本自由，尊重所有人的平等权利，不分种族、性别、语言或宗教，开展国际合作以解决经济、社会、文化或人道主义方面的国际问题，诚意履行根据《宪章》承担的义务，
模拟联合国大会发言稿
啊。
。
。
。
。
。
。
。
。
。
求一份模拟联合国大会航空与恐怖问题的发言稿国家法国 在线等急
1.首先说你的国家或你所在的国家联盟是否支持中亚无核区的建立；2.再简要追溯核武器对中亚各国经济、政治、文化、人权等的影响；3.强调核武器对中亚乃至世界各国的潜在威胁；4.最后再次重申自己的立场。
(建议：1.语言简洁、官方。
2.多查背景资料，发言时尽量用资料上的语言。
3.把发言稿背下来，脱稿发言。
4.多练几次，把握好时间，不多不少最好。
）
急求英国在模拟联合国大会上的英文发言稿 关于环境保护 节能减排
擦，竟然是摸联的，哎 都不知道我的还有没有存，看到这个问题，心痒了，留个言，楼主莫怪
求模拟联合国大会中文的主持稿
有满意的补充财富值
什么是所谓的主持稿
是欢迎词还是主持会议的时候要说的主持的话
如何消除食品安全的威胁
（模拟联合国大会英文演讲稿）
2Food security under threat: global response needed Climate change and commodity speculation are among the main factors threatening food security inside and outside the EU, according to a European Parliament resolution adopted on Thursday. MEPs call for urgent measures to combat food price manipulation and ensure that food production is maintained in the EU. Droughts, floods, fires and storms, on a greater scale than in the past, are reducing agricultural capacity all over the world, says the resolution. Soil and water management must be improved to prevent loss of farmland, and the Commission should monitor national climate change mitigation measures, believe MEPs. Tackling speculationMEPs criticise speculation in food commodities, agricultural raw materials and energy markets, all of which puts food security at risk. The G20 is urged to work for the convergence of market regulations by involving countries that are not part of the G20 in the fight against food price manipulation.Parliament asks the Commission to consider giving the new European Security and Markets Authority more power to prevent abuses in commodity markets. Dealing in food commodities should be limited to investors who have a genuine link with agricultural markets, MEPs believe.In addition, MEPs call on national governments not to impose curbs on exports, as these provoke greater uncertainty in the markets and disrupt world markets, and therefore have the potential to drive prices up further at global level. Helping EU farmersTo guarantee food security in the EU, a strong Common Agricultural Policy is needed, says the resolution. Declining farm incomes, caused by higher production costs to meet health, environmental and animal welfare standards, need to be urgently addressed to ensure there are farmers in the EU in the future. Market intervention tools, such as intervention and strategic stocks, must be part of the policy, says Parliament.Support for farmers in developing countriesSince agriculture is a key economic sector in the developing world, MEPs call for a larger proportion of the financial aid for this sector to be used to support more effective and sustainable farming practices. They add that land ownership should be promoted to reduce poverty and increase food security.The resolution was approved by show of hands. 3New threat to global food security as phosphate supplies become increasingly scarceA new report from the Soil Association reveals that supplies of phosphate rock are running out faster than previously thought and that declining supplies and higher prices of phosphate are a new threat to global food security. ‘A rock and a hard place: Peak phosphorus and the threat to our food security’ highlights the urgent need for farming to become less reliant on phosphate rock-based fertiliser. [1]Intensive agriculture is totally dependent on phosphate for the fertility needed to grow crops and grass. Worldwide 158 million tonnes of phosphate rock is mined every year, but the supply is finite. Recent analysis suggests that we may hit ‘peak’ phosphate as early as 2033, after which supplies will become increasingly scarce and more expensive. [2]This critical issue is missing from the global policy agenda - we are completely unprepared to deal with the shortages in phosphorus inputs, the drop in production and the hike in food prices that will follow. Without fertilisation from phosphorus it has been estimated that wheat yields could more then halve in coming decades, falling from nine tonnes a hectare to four tonnes a hectare. The current price of phosphate rock is approximately twice that of 2006. When demand for phosphate fertiliser outstripped supply in 2007\\\/08, the price of rock phosphate rose 800%.In Europe we are dependent on imports of rock phosphate, having no deposits of our own, but the geographical concentration of reserves adds further uncertainty to the future security of our sources. In 2009, 158 million metric tonnes of phosphaterock was mined worldwide. 67% of this resource was mined in just three countries - China (35%), the USA (17%) and Morocco and Western Sahara (15%). China has now restricted, and the USA has stopped, exports of phosphate. [3]Author of the report, Dr. Isobel Tomlinson, said: A radical rethink of how we farm, what we eat and how we deal with human excreta, so that adequate phosphorus levels can be maintained without reliance on mined phosphate, is crucial for ensuring our future food supplies.‘A rock and a hard place’ sets out the actions needed to close the loop on the phosphorus cycle. These include:Changing how we farmDifferent farming systems vary enormously in their reliance on mined phosphate. Organic farms are more resilient to the coming phosphorus rock ‘shock’, as it can only be used as a supplement to nutrient recycling (including crop rotations, green manures, and composting), and not as a replacement. Organic crops generally have a lower fertiliser requirement than non-organic crops, with a greater capacity to scavenge for nutrients through denser and deeper root systems.Changing what we eatEating less meat can reduce the demand for mined phosphate. This is because vegetable-based production is more efficient in its use of phosphorus then livestock production. Although different types of meat have different levels of mined phosphate demand depending on the farming system used to produce them. Meat from livestock grazed on grassland that has not been fertilised with artificial fertilisers, will perform much better than meat from livestock grazed on fields that have been, or livestock fed on grain grown using artificial fertilisers.Changing how we deal with human exretaThe report recommends a radical change in the way we treat human exreta and the need to abandon our current ‘flush-and-forget’ toilet systems in favour of Ecological Sanitation. The report also calls for a change to EU organic regulations to allow the use of human sewage – rich in ‘natural’ phosphate - on agricultural land to ensure phosphate levels are maintained. Globally only 10% of human waste is returned to agricultural soils. Urine alone contains more than 50% of the phosphorus excreted by humans.
