关于青春和信仰的演讲稿
每个人的一生都有必须做地三件事：吃喝，睡觉，上厕所。
作为一个人这都是必需的，但如果是一直只有这些事，只会使我们变成行尸走肉。
人吗，应当有追求，更应该有原则，换句话说，一个人需要理想和信仰。
在中华五千年的历史中，没有哪一个团体比我们的党的理想更远大，没有哪一个组织的成员比我们的党员信仰更坚定，所以没有哪一个团队比中国共产党更成功。
党章中就有我们的党信仰的文字化描述：中国共产党是工人阶级的先锋队，是中国各族人民利益的忠实代表，是中国社会主义事业的领导核心；对理想的描述是实现共同富裕，也就是国家富强。
有了这种理想与信仰中国共产党才能由弱变强，进而主宰中国现代的历史。
转而说个人，也是这个道理。
信仰与理想的作用也是不可估量的，它们是人生之舟的帆和舵.有了它们,一个人才能称之为人,一个人才能让有限的生命迸发出无限的能量,为世界增添一点亮色.世界上有很多这样的例子,像领导各国人民摆脱民族压迫的的领袖们,像让黑人获得权利的马丁.路德.金,以及在各个领域都有卓越建树的成功人士,毫无例外的,他们都有坚定的信仰与远大的理想,所以作为未来承担历史任务的主体大学生我们更应该拥有远大的理想和找到坚定的信仰世界上没有完全一样的两个人,但理想是可以共有的,信仰也是可以分享的.如果我们中的某些人志同道合,那是再还不过了,因为那不是简单的代数相加而是可能会发生质的变化,将不可能化为可能.关于怎样树立理想与找到坚定的信仰,作为社会主义接班人的我们的个人理想无疑要服从国家理想,我们的信仰也要服从马列主义.在不于国家理想矛盾的情况下,树立自己的的理想;根据马列主义找到自己的信仰.只有这样我们才不会被历史潮流淹没,成为祖国的罪人.具体细节方面因人而异,但大的方向不能错.
以“与信仰对话，为中国梦奋斗”为主题的演讲稿怎么写
你可以把信仰当成目标付出所有的目标，中国梦就是信仰，为了目标奋斗把，为了永恒的目标信仰来写，希望帮到你
急求一篇演讲稿以《做有志青年》为主题如题 谢谢了
争做有志青年 知荣辱、树新风，争做有志青年 在世界的东方，有一片充满神奇色彩的广阔土地，这就是我们中华民族世世代代繁衍生息的地方。
五千年来多少心系天下、爱国爱民的志士仁人，多少鞠躬尽瘁、死而后已的忠义之士，多少勤劳质朴、古道热肠的普通百姓，都成了民族精神的化身
中华民族是一个有着悠久的传统美德的民族。
从耻食周粟的伯夷叔齐到不为五斗米折腰的陶渊明；从耻为亡国奴的文天祥到以做一个中国人而骄傲的吉鸿昌……再看看新时代那些当之无愧的道德偶像吧：保家卫国为打造雄师锐旅而鞠躬尽瘁的杨业功；坚守在贵州深山为村民健康付出青春的赤脚医生李春燕；在台风中为救落水者三次跳入巨浪的“侠之大者”河南小伙魏青刚；连续12年自强自立、带着妹妹上学的河南青年洪战辉；…… 他们，在当今这个时代演绎着无数可歌可泣的事迹，他们是中国的脊梁；他们弘扬着道德的旗帜，耸立起一座座人格的丰碑。
以何为荣
以何为耻
这样的思考，人类从来就没有停止过。
今天，胡主席又提出了“八荣八耻”的社会主义荣辱观，它为我们树立了新时期的道德观，它是我们构建和谐社会的道德观，它清楚地告诉我们：做一个有道德、知荣辱的人，人民将永远记住他。
有人说，一个国家有什么样的孩子，就有什么样的未来。
我们青年人是祖国的明天，肩负着祖国的未来，更应该知荣辱，辩荣辱，自觉做为荣之事，反对做为辱之行。
时代呼唤精神动力，民族需要精神家园。
我们要弘扬世间的真情，秉承人性的光辉，用实际行动勾勒出人世间不可或缺的真、善、美。
芸芸众生中，我，只是沧海一粟。
浩瀚的知识海洋里，我更像个无知者。
但我不因渺小而枉自菲薄，不因无知而自矮三分。
在追逐梦想的征途上，在实现人生价值的征程中，我要以青春的昂扬，以年少的锐气，坚守诚信，守住本分；坚守勤奋，守住理想；坚守科学，守住信仰，以荣辱观为科学指引，用昂然锐气在天地间书写一个大写的人生
奥斯特洛夫斯基在《钢铁是怎样炼成的》一书中写道：“人的一生可能燃烧，也可能腐朽。
我不能腐朽，我渴望燃烧起来。
” 燃烧起来，让生命之光燃烧起来
让明辨荣辱的智慧之光燃烧起来
让辨别美丑的心灵之光燃烧起来
青春，是一首永远唱不完的歌，今天的拼搏定然凝聚在人生的史册上。
让我们在浩翰的理想之海中，扬起追求的风帆，高举“八荣八耻”的道德旗帜，乘风破浪奋勇前进吧记得采纳啊
有关“励志向上做合格青年”的主题演讲稿
信仰是一个人的精神内核，是支撑人坚定走下去的动力源泉。
一个有信仰的人是一个有追求的人，时刻哟种无形的力量支撑着他往前走，即使身体离岗，精神永不离岗。
张海迪阿姨就是一个最好的例子。
5岁时，因病半身瘫痪，不能上学，但是对生命的渴望，对生活的热爱，使她在困难面前永不服输。
终于经历种种磨难，自学完成了多种语言，并创作出版了许多书籍，成了国内外有名的残疾人作家。
我们的革命战士，为了新中国的成立抛头颅洒热血，面对敌人的威逼利诱，面对敌人的严刑拷打，面对死亡，义无返顾，勇往直前，这就是因为他们心中有自己的信仰，有自己认为可以用生命去为之奋斗的东西，这就是信仰的力量。
人的胜利，不见得属于强者，但或迟或早，那相信自己能成功的人必能成功。
有了信仰，前方的路就不会再迷茫;有了信仰，前进的路中就不会再孤单;有了信仰，就有了翅膀，坚定得向着未来飞翔……
信仰的力量英文演讲稿
说实话我是COPY的.你看看能不能用把.A religion is a system of human thought which usually includes a set of narratives, symbols, beliefs and practices that give meaning to the practitioner's experiences of life through reference to a higher power, deity or deities, or ultimate truth.[1] Religion is commonly identified by the practitioner's prayer, ritual, meditation, music and art, among other things, and is often interwoven with society and politics. It may focus on specific supernatural, metaphysical, and moral claims about reality (the cosmos and human nature) which may yield a set of religious laws, ethics, and a particular lifestyle. Religion also encompasses ancestral or cultural traditions, writings, history, and mythology, as well as personal faith and religious experience.The term religion refers to both the personal practices related to communal faith and to group rituals and communication stemming from shared conviction. Religion is sometimes used interchangeably with faith or belief system,[2] but it is more socially defined than personal convictions, and it entails specific behaviors, respectively.In the frame of western religious thought,[3] religions present a common quality, the hallmark of patriarchal religious thought: the division of the world in two comprehensive domains, one sacred, the other profane.[4] According to the futurist Raymond Kurzweil, The primary role of traditional religion is deathist rationalization—that is, rationalizing the tragedy of death as a good thing.[5] Religion is often described as a communal system for the coherence of belief focusing on a system of thought, unseen being, person, or object, that is considered to be supernatural, sacred, divine, or of the highest truth. Moral codes, practices, values, institutions, tradition, rituals, and scriptures are often traditionally associated with the core belief, and these may have some overlap with concepts in secular philosophy. Religion is also often described as a way of life or a life stance Religion and the body politicA good understanding of the meaning of Christianity before the word religion came into common usage can be found in St. Augustine's writing. For Augustine, Christianity was a disciplina, a rule just like that of the Roman Empire. Christianity was therefore a power structure opposing and superseding human institutions, a literal Kingdom of Heaven. Rather than calling one to self-discipline through symbols, it was itself the discipline taught by one's family, school, church, and city authorities.[11] However at this point the root of the English word religion, the Latin religio, was in use only to mean reverence for God or the gods, careful pondering of divine things, piety (which Cicero further derived to mean diligence[12]); in other words, there was no sense of a system nor even of the Christian power structure but only of spirituality.[13] Max Müller characterized many other cultures around the world, including Egypt, Persia, and India, as having a similar power structure at this point in history. What we would call religion today, they would only call law.[14]As Christianity became commonplace, the charismatic authority identified by Augustine, a quality we might today call religiousness, had a commanding influence at the local level. This system persisted in the Byzantine Empire following the East-West Schism, while Western Europe regulated unpredictable expressions of charisma through the Roman Catholic Church. However, as the Church lost its dominance during the Protestant Reformation and Christianity became closely tied to political structures, religion was recast as the basis of national sovereignty, and religious identity gradually became a less universal sense of spirituality and more divisive, locally defined, and tied to nationality.[15] It was at this point that religion was dissociated with universal beliefs and moved closer to dogma in both meaning and practice. However there was not yet the idea of dogma as personal choice, only of established churches.Religious freedomIn the Age of Enlightenment, the idea of Christianity as the purest expression of spirituality was supplanted by the concept of religion as a worldwide practice.[16] This caused such ideas as religious freedom, a reexamination of classical philosophy as an alternative to Christian thought, and more radically Deism among intellectuals such as Voltaire. Much like Christianity, the idea of religious freedom was exported around the world as a civilizing technique, even to regions like India that had never treated spirituality as a matter of political identity.[17] In Japan, where Buddhism was still seen as a philosophy of natural law,[18] the concept of religion and religious freedom as separate from other power structures was unnecessary until Christian missionaries demanded free access to conversion, and when Japanese Christians refused to engage in patriotic events.[19]With the Enlightenment religion lost its attachment to nationality, but rather than being a universal social attitude, it was now a personal feeling, or emotion.[20] Friedrich Schleiermacher in the late 18th century defined religion as das schlechthinnige Abhängigkeitsgefühl, commonly translated as a feeling of absolute dependence.[21] His contemporary Hegel disagreed thoroughly, defining religion as the Divine Spirit becoming conscious of Himself through the finite spirit.[22] William James is an especially notable 19th century subscriber to the theory of religion as feeling.Confucianism, Taoism, and Buddhism are one, a painting in the litang style portraying three men laughing by a river stream, 12th century, Song DynastyModern currents in religionReligious studiesWith the recognition of religion as a category separate from culture and society came the rise of religious studies. Clifford Geertz's definition of religion as a cultural system was dominant for most of the 20th century and continues to be widely accepted today.Sociologists and anthropologists tend to see religion as an abstract set of ideas, values, or experiences developed as part of a cultural matrix. For example, in Lindbeck's Nature of Doctrine, religion does not refer to belief in God or a transcendent Absolute. Instead, Lindbeck defines religion as, a kind of cultural and\\\/or linguistic framework or medium that shapes the entirety of life and thought… it is similar to an idiom that makes possible the description of realities, the formulation of beliefs, and the experiencing of inner attitudes, feelings, and sentiments.”[23] According to this definition, religion refers to one's primary worldview and how this dictates one's thoughts and actions. Thus religion is considered by some sources to extend to causes, principles, or activities believed in with zeal or conscientious devotion concerning points or matters of ethics or conscience, and not necessarily including belief in the supernatural.[24]Although evolutionists had previously sought to understand and explain religion in terms of a cultural attribute which might conceivably confer biological advantages to its adherents, Richard Dawkins called for a re-analysis of religion in terms of the evolution of self-replicating ideas apart from any resulting biological advantages they might bestow. He argued that the role of key replicator in cultural evolution belongs not to genes, but to memes replicating thought from person to person by means of imitation. These replicators respond to selective pressures that may or may not affect biological reproduction or survival.[25] Susan Blackmore regards religions as particularly tenacious memes.[26] Chris Hedges, however, regards meme theory as a misleading imposition of genetics onto psychology.Interfaith cooperationBecause religion continues to be recognized in Western thought as a universal impulse, many religious practitioners have aimed to band together in interfaith dialogue and cooperation. The first major dialogue was the Parliament of the World's Religions at the 1893 Chicago World's Fair, which remains notable even today both in affirming universal values and recognition of the diversity of practices among different cultures. The 20th century has been especially fruitful in use of interfaith dialogue as a means of solving ethnic, political, or even religious conflict, with Christian-Jewish reconciliation representing a complete reverse in the attitudes of many Christian communities towards Jews.Secularism and criticism of religionMain articles: Criticism of religion, Antireligion, Secularism, Agnosticism, and AtheismAs religion became a more personal matter, discussions of society found a new focus on political and scientific meaning, and religious attitudes were increasingly seen as irrelevant for the needs of the European world. On the political side, Ludwig Feuerbach recast Christian beliefs in light of humanism, paving the way for Karl Marx's famous characterization of religion as the opiate of the masses. Meanwhile, in the scientific community, T.H. Huxley in 1869 coined the term agnostic, a term subsequently adopted by such figures as Robert Ingersoll. Later, Bertrand Russell told the world Why I Am Not a Christian.Atheists have developed a critique of religious systems as well as personal faith. Modern-day critics focus on religion's lack of utility in human society, faulting religion as being irrational.[27] Some assert that dogmatic religions are in effect morally deficient, elevating to moral status ancient, arbitrary, and ill-informed rules—taboos on eating pork, for example, as well as dress codes and sexual practices[28]—possibly designed for reasons of hygiene or even mere politics in a bygone era.In North America and Western Europe the social fallout of the 9\\\/11 attacks contributed in part to the appearance of numerous pro-secularist books, such as The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins, The End of Faith by Sam Harris, and God is not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything by Christopher Hitchens. This criticism is largely, but not entirely, focused on the monotheistic Abrahamic traditions.Religious beliefCentral Asian (Tocharian) and East-Asian Buddhist monks, Bezeklik, Eastern Tarim Basin, 9th-10th centuryMain article: Religious beliefReligious belief usually relates to the existence, nature and worship of a deity or deities and divine involvement in the universe and human life. Alternately, it may also relate to values and practices transmitted by a spiritual leader. Unlike other belief systems, which may be passed on orally, religious belief tends to be codified in literate societies (religion in non-literate societies is still largely passed on orally[29]). In some religions, like the Abrahamic religions, it is held that most of the core beliefs have been divinely revealed.Religious belief can also involve causes, principles or activities believed in with zeal or conscientious devotion concerning points or matters of ethics or conscience, not necessarily limited to organized religions
青年马克思主义演讲稿
今天我读完魏老师的“自强不息”一文，真有“听君一席话，胜读十年书”之感，文字朴实无华，却精辟透彻，极具说服力展现出“传道、授业、解惑”的大师风范，从文章的字里行间里深深感受到一个优秀教育工作者对人生的彻悟和高尚的精神追求。
一、对社会，保持平常心态。
人们常说：人生不如意事常八九。
我们常常会因为期望值高、急于求成，而心浮气躁、患得患失；因为遇到困难、遭受挫折而容易垂头丧气、怨天忧人；因为自己辛苦忙碌而看到社会上一些腐败现象而心生幽怨、心态失衡，甚至一叶障目，对自己的理想追求产生动摇。
魏老师视角独到：越站在悠长的人类历史的角度看，就越容易把自己融入追真、向善、求美的主流中，汇入主流，有了坚定正确的信仰，灵魂才不再流浪，精神才不再漂泊，思想不再浮躁。
从报恩、从适应的角度看，便觉得天高地阔，随时都有发展的空间。
在红尘滚滚，价值取向多元化的社会转型期，对我们这些不高不低的人来说，保持一颗平常的心，换个角度看问题，实在是太重要了。
把困难当作培养适应能力的机会，把失败作为人生的历练过程，把成绩作为对自己的鞭策和新的起点，把别人的要求和议论当作是天使赐予的磨励，始终保持自身良好的心态。
否则我们就会在利益冲撞，矛盾纷争中耿耿于怀，怕这怕那，作茧自缚，不能自拔，不仅害了自己，也成就不了事业。
要相信，历史总在前进，社会总在进步。
要把自己融入社会发展的主流，融入学校生动活泼的教育教学工作，融入和谐校园的建设，在学生成长中发展，在发展中体验人生的快乐。
二、对工作，保持平实的心态 我们青年时初到一个岗位总有些不安心，不甘心，这山望着那山高，羡慕他人工作生活的愉悦舒适。
觉得医生收入高，还可以有红包，就想做医生；觉得律师既风光又富有，就想做律师；觉得上海苏州的工资高，就想到上海调苏州，做了医生，做了律师，到了上海苏州，如果不能满足预期的欲望就又要吐露愚痴的怨言了。
事实上，小刀手可能有红包，但出了事可不得了，律师可以致富，但不少律师无人请，到上海苏州房价又太高，上班路太远，新的问题又来了。
有愿望有想法本身并不错，人类就是在永不满足中去追求与奋斗而进步的；关键是对工作岗位保持平实的心态，在现实的工作中一步一个脚印地去努力。
正是魏老师所说，暂时无法实现理想时，就把目前的岗位当作提高自己素质的训练基地，而机遇总是青睐有准备的人。
魏老师正是有一个平实的心态，把教育工作当作享受，置身课堂，探幽索微，乐趣无穷，在平凡的工作中作出不平凡的业绩。
为官为民，他都有一颗宁静的心，一个充实的精神家园。
三、对他人，保持平和的心态 文化大革中，强调以阶级斗争为纲，讲斗争哲学 ，要七斗八斗，斗出个社会主义，结果是越斗国家越乱，越斗人心越散，越斗老百姓越穷。
文革不仅整整毁了一代人，它带来的内伤和思想混乱将影响很长的时间。
前几年，我经常看到：街上两自行车相撞，也都没有受伤，双方却唇枪舌剑，非辩个谁是谁非，互不相让，甚至大打出手，没有撞伤反而打伤了，根本不去想平和的解决方法。
工作中有了矛盾，相互抱怨，肯定是对方和我过不去，我一定不能饶了他，非把他摆平不可，于是排斥他，抵毁他，厌恶他，给小鞋穿，想不到 推己及人，换位思考，想不到以和为贵；对曾经顶撞过自己的后进学生，也常气不打一处来，生硬、不屑、冷漠，想不到严在当严处，爱在细微中那春风化雨般的教育途径。
魏老师说得好：当我把周围的人都看成天使的时候，我觉得自己天天生活在天堂里。
反过来，“文化大革命”期间，当把许多人看成阶级敌人的时候，我觉得自己的灵魂煎熬在地狱中。
不过高地要求别人，努力善待别人，多互助，少互斗。
真是一个好的遇人处事的思维方式，关键还在于自己要拥有一个平和的心态。
随着社会的进步，观念的转变，我们相信不仅是好人总比坏人多，而且是好人越来越多。
四、对自己，保持不断完善的心态。
我们经常在失误、失利、失败的时候，总是从外部找原因，什么大环境不好，家庭背景差，领导不识人，同事素养不高，甚至认为时运不济，一切命中注定。
很少在自身内部找原因，很少反思反省，从而使自己常常在苦恼和郁闷中煎熬。
魏老师说：人生最难管理的实际是自己的心灵世界，最主要的还是要不断解放自我，珍爱自我，超越自我。
处天外遥望地球很小，能使我们不自傲，不因取得成绩而冲昏头脑；居体内细察心域极宽，能使我们不自卑，充满激情地把自己应做的事做好而宠辱不惊。
珍爱自己的正当权益，珍爱自己的时间空间，珍爱自己的特长特点，守住平常心，做好平凡事，不断完善自己。
魏书生老师作为教育局长，不是光讲大道理，不是对别人马列主义，对自己是自由主义。
而是把别人当朋友，交根交底，说不高不低、切实可行的知心话，所以倍感亲切，使人信服；更主要的是魏老师身体力行，率先垂范，他一直在上课、一直在管理、一直在思考、一直在自强不息， 使人折服。
这就是魏老师作为一方教育行政长官理解和实践做好教师思想政治工作的独到本领和可敬之处。
让我们都学会调整心态，善于交往沟通，让我们天天有一个好心情，愉快的工作、学习和生活。
