关于懒惰的演讲稿
第一篇：（简单的）Ladies and Gentlemen , Good afternoon! I’m very glad to stand here and give you a short speech. today my topic is “Life”. I hope you will like it , Man’s life is a process of growing up, actually I’m standing here is a growth. If a person’s life must constituted by various choices, then I grow up along with these choices. Once I hope I can study in a college in future, however that’s passed, as you know I come here, now I wonder what the future holds for (= what will happen to) me. When I come to this school, I told to myself: this my near future, all starts here. Following I will learn to become a man, a integrated man, who has a fine body, can take on important task, has independent thought, an open mind, intensive thought, has the ability to judge right and wrong, has a perfect job. ?? Once my teacher said :” you are not sewing, you are stylist; never forget which you should lay out to people is your thought, not craft.” I will put my personality with my interest and ability into my study, during these process I will combine learning with doing. If I can achieve this “future”, I think that I really grow up. And I deeply believe kindred, good-fellowship and love will perfection and happy in the future. How to say future? Maybe it’s a nice wish. Lets make up our minds, stick to it and surely well enjoy our life. 先生们小姐们，大家下午好
我非常荣幸站在这里为你们带来一段小小的演讲，我今天所要讲的主题是“生命”，我希望你们喜欢。
人们的生活正在逐步的改善着。
实际上，我站在这里就正在成长。
如果一个人的生命必须面对许多各种各样的选择，那么，我会一边选择，一边成长。
曾经我希望我能在将来在大学里学习，不管怎么样，我考过了，如你所见到的，我现在正站在这梦寐以求的大学里，可是现在，我更渴望知道我的未来会有什么等着我。
当我来到这所学校的时候，我告诉我自己。
我的将来就从这里开始，接下来，我要学着去成为一个男人，一个
的男人，并有一个健康的身体。
能够胜任重任，能有独到的见解，能见识广泛，能思想深邃，能判断出对的和错的，能工作的非常出色。
我的老师曾经说过：“你不闭塞，你可以自成流派。
永远不要忘记你所能展示给人们是你的思想，不是你的技术。
”我将把我的人格和我的兴趣以及我的能力带到我的学习中去，在这个过程中，我将注重实践和理论的结合。
如果我能实现我的这个梦想，我想，我那时就真正的长大了，那时我相信我的亲情，友情，爱情将会变的十分完美，十分幸福。
你对你的将来怎么看呢
可能那会是一个很美好的愿望。
让我们坚定我们的目标，为之努力，并真正的享受我们的生命第二篇：稍难,而且比较长，你可以根据中文掐掉一些修饰的段落，精简一下。
是篇好文章。
Objectively SpeakingPeople in this world can be divided into two categories: those always working and those always making comments. The working ones never have time to idle away. Some may run a hotel, or do some business; some may open a factory or set up a school; others may be absorbed in scientific research, or devoted to military affairs or political issues. Right or wrong, successful or failed, they are always fully committed to their careers. Facing all kinds of risks(not because they neglect them, but mainly because they have the courage), and shouldering the responsibilities, they march forward, bravely and cautiously. They are risking their luck and their lives as well. They have neither time nor energy to comment on others. While attentively planning the future, they devote themselves wholly in hard work, leaving the embroidered stories and malicious gossips flying in the air. The commenting ones, however, usually work less, and even if they want to work sometimes, they simply are not capable enough. They are no better than anyone, but show admiration to nobody either. They blame either the heaven, or the earth, but never themselves. They dare not to take any risks, but they are also afraid of any hard work. They are gossip-mongers, making stories and spreading rumors, making you feel annoyed and upset. It’s not because that you have hurt them, or disturbed them, or hindered them, but because you are working. If only you are working, he is there commenting. Everything is hard at the beginning. You have just started a new cause, needing encouragement and support, yet he is there pouring a jar of cold water or blowing a gust of chilly wind, making you worried or perplexed. But once you have succeeded, he is there again sharing your success without feeling a little ashamed of the discouragement he had given you.Many people don’t like using their mind but enjoy echoing the views of others. They often take it for granted that the working ones are wrong while the commenting ones are definitely right. However in all fairness, how can it be true? Not working itself is already wrong, and it is a blunder to hurt the hard working people.From ancient time to the present, many great men have been commented on endlessly. Take the cases of Confucius, Emperor Qinshihuang, Empress Wu Zetian, Gengis Khan, Dr. Sun Yet-sun, Chairman Mao, Deng Xiaoping, etc.. Both positive and negative criticism have been made about them. They not only enjoyed compliments but also suffered slanders from all over the world.When commenting on what’s right and what’s wrong, the commenting ones themselves don’t really know what is wrong and what is right. They are simply demanding perfection. When criticizing the others’ inability, they themselves are actually unable to do anything, but simply pretending that they know better. This can well be compared with the actors and spectators. A new program is always followed by large amounts of criticism from the spectators. But if a spectator is given a chance to perform, a disaster will surely happen. Diners are always commenting on the skills of the chefs while readers are always criticizing the writers. Another case in point is the forty-chapter sequel of A Dream of the Red Mansions, which were written by Gao E who did a nearly perfect job. Nevertheless there are always such people who claim to be the experts on the novel, criticizing the latter forty chapters as a wretched sequel to a fine work. What if we ask them to write the sequel? I’m afraid they can only make it worse. It’s easier said than done.Capable and wealthy people are always the focus of the society. Capable people are usually marching ahead of others and may not be properly understood, hence causing various kinds of comments, more criticism but less support; Capable people can easily succeed, thus causing both admiration and comments, more jealousy but less appreciation (only their good luck is recognized); Capable people can be sought for help and attract the attention of the society, thus causing a lot of comments, more complaints but less gratitude (even though they didn’t ask anyone for help, if only they were not able to help others in a satisfactory way, it’s already their fault);Capable people can also suffer setbacks (some even experience ups and downs many times), experiencing fully the warmth and coldness of the human world, more hurts but less helps.Wealthy people are non the easier. No doubt there are cruel-hearted rich men, but it is also wrong to think that no wealthy people are kind-hearted. They are capable of devising and managing and they often need to take risks to get the chance. But who care about these?Whenever a group are dining or entertaining, everyone will take it for granted that the rich should pay the bill instead of going Dutch. If the rich doesn’t pay, then he’ll definitely be regarded as a miser;Among good friends and relatives, the rich should often help the poor, otherwise he will surely be blamed for his cruel-heartedness;From the ancient times, people have been used to killing the rich to save the poor, without thinking about how the rich became rich and the poor stayed poor. The policy of “allowing some people to get rich” has balanced people’s mind to some extent, but there is still a long way to go before we can get rid of “the hatred toward the wealthy”.Capable people or rich people are just human, neither sages nor perfect men. They have their own faults, and they may also commit mistakes. But objectively speaking, some mistakes are forced on them, which are the expectations of the public. They are expected to do this or that, but when expectations become disappointments, they have to take the blaming. In fact, it’s the public’s fault to demand for perfection or counting on unrealistic expectations of the rich.I encourage people to work, even though they may commit mistakes.I advise those enjoying commenting to make some effort to do something for the others. I hope people can make comments objectively instead of subjectively, without going to extremes, and not out of preference. I also hope that the hard-working people do not care too much about what the others say, even what the others criticize. You should believe that public opinions will finally decide what’s right and what’s wrong. What we need is just time. 平心而论 （中文翻译）世界上总有一些人在做事，总有一些人在说事。
做事的人不闲着，或者包个饭店，或者搞个买卖，或者办个工厂，或者建个学校，或者专心科研，或者从军从政。
也许对，也许错；也许成功，也许失败，但很投入。
他们担着天下的风险（并非都是忽略，大多还是敢于面对），扛着双肩的责任，奋然前行，又战战兢兢，常常是在赌运、也赌命。
他们没有时间去说别人的事，也没有精力去理会别人的事。
他们抬头看路，埋头做事，任由别人的飞短流长。
说事的人，常常是不大做事。
或者也曾经想做事，但做不来。
他们可能谁都不如，但又谁都不服。
怨天怨地，不怨自己。
他们不敢担任何的风险，又不肯出少许的力气。
一件事，他们能从头说到尾。
先是乌鸦叫，后来喜鹊噪，一会一变脸，令你心烦闹。
并不是你伤害了他，并不是你干扰了他，并不是你阻碍了他。
但只要你在做事，他就会来说事。
万事开头难。
当你刚刚起步，正需要鼓励与支持的时候，他会一盆凉水，一股阴风，让你浑身不舒服。
而一旦你业有所成，他又会满面春风地来分一瓢羹，好象不曾给过你那片下雨的乌云。
世上有许多人不喜欢动脑，却习惯于人云亦云。
他们常以为错在做事的人，理在说事的人。
但平心而论，怎么会这样呢
不做事，本身就是错。
再打击做事的人，不是错上加错嘛
从古至今，许多能人，伟人，都被无休无止地评论着。
如、、、、、、等，说是的有，说非的也有。
也堪称誉满天下，谤满天下。
说人是非，并非明白是非，不过是求全责备而已。
说人不行，未必自己真行，不过装腔作势而已。
就如演员与观众，每个节目出来，都会有一大堆褒贬。
但真让观众上台，可能又演不成了。
食客总是在评论厨师的手艺，读者总是在评论作者的长短。
再如的后四十回，乃所续写。
公平地说，几近天衣无缝。
但就有那么些人，甚至打着红学家的招牌，一定要说后四十回怎么不行，怎么狗尾续貂。
真不行吗
就让这几位“红学家”写写看，他们恐怕连鼠尾都拿不出来。
侃山容易，搬山难啊。
能人、富人，永远都是社会的焦点。
能人可能超前，为世人所不理解，会引起议论纷纷，支持的少，攻击的多。
能人可能成功，引起世人的羡慕，也会引起众多评论，佩服的少，嫉妒的多。
（只承认你的运气和侥幸）能人可能被求助，受到世人的关注，从而导致事后的品评，感谢的少，抱怨的多。
（你没有求人，但别人求你的事没办或没办好，都是你的错。
）能人也会遭遇挫折，（有人甚至三起三落）感受人心的冷暖，洞知世态的炎凉，帮扶的少，推墙的多。
富人也不轻松。
固然也有为富不仁者，但也不能说所有的富者都不仁。
他们还有经营能力和运作手段，并且常常要充满冒险地去把握先机。
但谁管这些
一群人吃饭或游乐，大家一定会认为要富者买单，而不是AA制。
如果你不买，那就是吝啬。
在亲朋好友的圈子里如果有富者，那就必须经常周济他人，否则就会被指责无情无义。
自古就有“杀富济贫”，不管富是怎么富，贫是怎么贫。
允许一部分人先富起来的政策，让人们的心态好多了。
但仇富观念的消除，还要漫长的历程。
能人、富人都是人，既不神圣，也非完人。
他们都有自身的毛病，也会犯各种错误。
但平心而论，还有一种错误是别人强加的，那就是众人的期望。
期望他们这样，期望他们那样，期望变成了失望，就成了他们的错。
对他们求全责备也好，对他们非份希求也好，其实都不应算作他们的错。
我主张鼓励做事的人，哪怕他们真的有错。
我奉劝说事的人，自己也努力去做些可做的事。
我希望人们能平心而论天下事，不要偏激，不要掺杂个人的恩怨，不要取舍于个人的得失。
我更希望做事的人，不要太在意别人一时怎么说、甚至怎么骂。
要相信，是非自有公论，只是个时间问题。
我需要一个简短的竞争英语课代表的演讲稿。
在这次竞选,我希望选举代表英语。
原因有三:1。
我希望能够更好地服务于学生和教师2。
我的英语有一些水平,在平时可以帮助学生3。
我希望我能和学生们互相学习,互相监督,有效提高学生的英语水平。
谢谢自己改改
关于珍惜时间的英文演讲稿
有什么可以消除你在工作中的懒惰和拖延最好的途径就是拒绝任何借口，主动工作的习惯。
一个永远勤奋而且乐于主动工作的人，将会得到老板甚至每个人的赞许和器重，同时，你也会为自己赢得一份重要的财产——自信，你会发现自己的才能足够可以赢得他人甚至一个机构的器重。
懒惰会让人的心灵变得灰暗，会让你对勤奋的人产生嫉妒，一个懒惰的人只会看到事物的表面现象，看到别人获得了财富，他会认为这不过是别人比自己更幸运罢了。
看到别人比自己更有常识和才智，则说那是因为自己的天分不如别人。
这样的人不明白没有努力是难以成功的。
事实上，每一个成功者的成就都是靠自己的不懈努力的，这其中不会有机缘的巧合。
懒惰的人最大的恶习就是拖沓。
把头一天的工作拖延到第二天，这种工作习惯实在让任何人都无法对他产生信任。
对一个渴望取得成功的人来说，拖延是一个危险的恶习，它将让你裹足不前。
拖延简直就是对我们宝贵生命的一种无端浪费。
但是此行为却在我们的工作和生活中不断发生，如果把你一天的时间记录下来，你会发现，拖延不知不觉地消耗了你大部分的时间。
有许多这样的人，他们大清早就被闹钟从睡梦中惊醒了，他一边想着自己的计划，一边又在怀念被窝里的温暖，一边告诉自己该起床了，一边又在对自己说——再睡一会吧
就这样，五分钟过去了，十分钟过去了……人们找借口总是那么理由充分，然而却难以把工作做好，这实在是件十分奇怪的事情。
其实，一个人只要把他那些整天想着如何欺瞒他人的时间和精力用到正事上来，他们是肯定能取得一番成绩的。
你必须要把拖延这一恶习从你的个性中连根拔除，这种把你应该在一周，甚至一月和一年前早该完成的工作拖延到明天再做习惯，正在一点一点地吞噬你的生命，如果你不把这一习惯彻底铲除，你要取得任何成就都是十分困难的。
古罗马皇帝在临终时给罗马人留下这样一句遗言：“懒惰是一种借口，勤奋工作吧
”当时，他的周围聚满了士兵。
罗马人有两条伟大的箴言，那就是勤奋与功绩，这也是罗马人征服世界的秘诀。
那时，任何一个从战场上胜利归来的将军都要走向田间。
那时的罗马最受人尊敬的工作就是农业生产，正是整个罗马人的勤奋与品质，终于使这个国家逐渐变得富强。
但是，当财富和奴隶慢慢增多时，罗马人开始觉得劳动变得不再必要了，于是，这个国家开始走向衰败，懒散导致罪犯增多、腐败滋生，一个高尚而伟大的民族就这样消失了。
许多似乎立刻就要成功的人——在别人眼里，他们似乎应该成为一个非凡的成功者，但事实上他们都没有做到。
这是什么原因呢
就是因为他们为成功付出相应的代价。
他们渴望抵达辉煌的硕峰，但却不愿跨过艰难的山路，他们不愿参加战斗，却又想获得胜利，他们不愿遇到阻力，却又希望一切顺利。
懒惰的人总是抱怨自己无能，连自己家人的温饱问题都解决不了。
而勤奋的人却说：“我没有什么天资，只会拼命干活换取面包。
”勤奋工作吧
只有勤奋工作，你才可能获得成功、财富与荣誉。
不要因为遇到困难就打退堂鼓，更不要因为就此敷衍了事，勤奋将指引你越过所有的艰难险阻，直到成功
勤奋工作将给你机会，任何一个老板都会赏识勤奋工作的员工，这是一种值得任何人尊敬的美德，走到哪里，它都会为你增光添彩。
不要贪图安逸，这只会让你变得堕落，整日游手好闲只会让你退化，只有勤奋工作才是高尚的，它将带给你人生真正的乐趣与幸福。
当你明白这一点时，请立刻改掉你身上的所有恶习，努力去找一份适合你的工作，你的境况将因此而改变。
要克服这种恶习，你就应该拒绝任何借口，养成主动工作的习惯，你可以这样去做：每天确定一项明确的工作任务，在你的上司尚未指示之前你就主动去把它做好。
每天至少做一件对他人有价值的事情，不要去在乎是否有报酬。
每天告诉别人养成主动工作习惯的意义，至少告诉一个人以上。
英文版:Lazy evaluationIn computer programming, lazy evaluation is the technique of delaying a computation until the result is required.The benefits of lazy evaluation include: performance increases due to avoiding unnecessary calculations, avoiding error conditions in the evaluation of compound expressions, the ability to construct infinite data structures, and the ability to define control structures as regular functions rather than built-in primitives.Languages that use lazy actions can be further subdivided into those that use a call-by-name evaluation strategy and those that use call-by-need. Most realistic lazy languages, such as Haskell, use call-by-need for performance reasons, but theoretical presentations of lazy evaluation often use call-by-name for simplicity.The opposite of lazy actions is eager evaluation, also known as strict evaluation. Eager evaluation is the evaluation behavior used in most programming languages.Lazy evaluation refers to how expressions are evaluated when they are passed as arguments to functions and entails the following three points:[1]The expression is only evaluated if the result is required by the calling function, called delayed evaluation.[2] The expression is only evaluated to the extent that is required by the calling function, called Short-circuit evaluation. the expression is never evaluated more than once, called applicative-order evaluation.[3]Delayed evaluationDelayed evaluation is used particularly in functional languages. When using delayed evaluation, an expression is not evaluated as soon as it gets bound to a variable, but when the evaluator is forced to produce the expression's value. That is, a statement such as x:=expression; (i.e. the assignment of the result of an expression to a variable) clearly calls for the expression to be evaluated and the result placed in x, but what actually is in x is irrelevant until there is a need for its value via a reference to x in some later expression whose evaluation could itself be deferred, though eventually the rapidly-growing tree of dependencies would be pruned in order to produce some symbol rather than another for the outside world to see.Some programming languages delay evaluation of expressions by default, and some others provide functions or special syntax to delay evaluation. In Miranda and Haskell, evaluation of function arguments is delayed by default. In many other languages, evaluation can be delayed by explicitly suspending the computation using special syntax (as with Scheme's delay and force and OCaml's lazy and Lazy.force) or, more generally, by wrapping the expression in a thunk. The object representing such an explicitly delayed evaluation is called a future or promise.Delayed evaluation has the advantage of being able to create calculable infinite lists without infinite loops or size matters interfering in computation. For example, one could create a function that creates an infinite list (often called a stream) of Fibonacci numbers. The calculation of the n-th Fibonacci number would be merely the extraction of that element from the infinite list, forcing the evaluation of only the first n members of the list.For example, in Haskell, the list of all Fibonacci numbers can be written as fibs = 0 : 1 : zipWith (+) fibs (tail fibs)In Haskell syntax, : prepends an element to a list, tail returns a list without its first element, and zipWith uses a specified function (in this case addition) to combine corresponding elements of two lists to produce a third.Provided the programmer is careful, only the values that are required to produce a particular result are evaluated. However, certain calculations may result in the program attempting to evaluate an infinite number of elements; for example, requesting the length of the list or trying to sum the elements of the list with a fold operation would result in the program either failing to terminate or running out of memory.Control structuresEven in most eager languages if statements evaluate in a lazy fashion.if a then b else cevaluates (a), then if and only if (a) evaluates to true does it evaluate (b), otherwise it evaluates (c). That is, either (b) or (c) will not be evaluated. Conversely, in an eager languagedefine f(x,y) = 2*xset k = f(e,f)will still evaluate (e) and (f) when computing (k). However, user-defined control structures depend on exact syntax, so for exampledefine g(a,b,c) = if a then b else cl = g(h,i,j)(i) and (j) would both be evaluated in an eager language.l' = if h then i else j(i) or (j) would be evaluated, but never both.Lazy evaluation allows control structures to be defined normally, and not as primitives or compile-time techniques. If (i) or (j) had side effects or introduced run time errors the subtle differences between (l) and (l') can be complex. As most programming languages are Turing-complete, it is of course possible to have developers introduce their own lazy control structures in eager languages, either as built-ins like C's ternary operator ?: or by other techniques such as clever use of lambdas, or macros.Controlling eagerness in lazy languagesIn lazy programming languages such as Haskell, although the default is to evaluate expressions only when they are demanded, it is possible in some cases to make code more eager - or conversely, to make it more lazy again after it has been made more eager. This can be done by explicitly coding something which forces evaluation (which may make the code more eager) or avoiding such code (which may make the code more lazy). Eagerness is also known as strictness.However, there is an optimisation implemented in some compilers called strictness analysis, which, in some cases, allows the compiler to infer that a value will always be used. In such cases, this may render the programmer's choice of whether to force that particular value or not, irrelevant, because strictness analysis will force strict evaluation.In Haskell, marking constructor fields strict means that their values will always be demanded immediately. The seq function can also be used to demand a value immediately and then pass it on, which is useful if a constructor field should generally be lazy. However, neither of these techniques implements recursive strictness - for that, a function called deepSeq was invented.Also, pattern matching in Haskell 98 is strict by default, so the ~ qualifier has to be used to make it lazy.Other usesIn computer windowing systems, the painting of information to the screen is driven by expose events which drive the display code at the last possible moment. By doing this, they avoid the computation of unnecessary display content.Another example of laziness in modern computer systems is copy-on-write page allocation or demand paging, where memory is allocated only when a value stored in that memory is changed.Laziness can be useful for high performance scenarios. An example is the Unix mmap functionality. mmap provides demand driven loading of pages from disk, so that only those pages actually touched are loaded into memory, and unnecessary memory is not allocated
关于时间管理的英语演讲稿
时间的宝贵(The Value of Time) A proverb says,Time is money. But in my opinion, time is even more precious than money. Why? Because when money is spent, we can earn it back. However, when time is gone, it will never return. This is the reason why we must value time.Collected by www．ii63·com It goes without saying that the time for our study and work is unusually limited. Hence, even an hour is extremely precious. We should make full use of our time to do useful things. As a student,I must make efforts to engage in my study so as to serve our nation and people in the future. But it is a pity that there. are a lot of people who do not know the importance of time. They do not realize that wasting time is equal to wasting a part of their valuable life.collected by II63·com In a word, we should form the good habit of saving time. Do not put off what can be done today till tomorrow. Laziness will not only bring us failure but also lead us to the road of poverty. 关于珍惜时间的英语演讲稿时间的宝贵 谚语说，“时间就是金钱。
”依我看，时间比金钱更可贵。
为什么? 因为钱花了，还可挣回来。
时间流逝了，将会一去不复返。
这就是我们应当珍惜时间的道 不消说，我们用于学习和工作的时间是有限的，因此，哪怕是一小时也是极其宝贵的。
我们应当充分利用时间去做有用的事情。
作为一名学生，我要努力专心学习以便将来为国为民服务。
遗憾的是，还有许多人并不知道时间的重要，他们还没有意识到浪费时间就等于浪费他们宝贵的生命。
一句话，我们应养成节约时间的好习惯。
不要把今天能完成的事拖到明天。
懒惰不仅导致失败，而且还会使我们贫困。
