做一个文明人(演讲稿)
记得有人说过：“人，一撇一捺，写起来容易做起来难。
我们要经常性地思考，我在做什么，我做得怎样，我要成为怎样的人。
”做怎样的人，每个人会有自己的答案，但在每一个答案的背后都有一个基点，那就是做人首先要做一个有教养的文明人。
人无德不立，国无德不兴。
由此可知，行为品德无论对个人还是对整个国家、整个民族都是何等的重要。
一个高素质、有教养的现代文明人，必须有良好的文明礼仪。
文明是什么
文明是路上相遇时的微笑，是同学有难时的热情帮助，是平时与人相处时的亲切，是见到师长时的问好，是不小心撞到对方时的一声“对不起”，是自觉将垃圾放入垃圾箱的举动，是看到有人随地吐痰时的主动制止等等。
文明是一种品质，是一种修养，是一种受人尊敬并被大家广泛推崇的行为。
有的同学认为，现代社会讲个人自由，懂不懂文明礼仪没关系，只要学习好、有真本事就行了。
的确，现代社会尊重个人的选择，自由度大了，然而，这并不意味着，现代社会对人的文明礼仪降低了要求。
恰恰相反，现代社会对人的文明礼仪要求更高了，因为文明礼仪是社会文明程度的重要标志。
我们只要留心一下周围人物，注意一下大众传媒，就不难发现，凡是事业有成的人他们都十分注重文明礼仪。
事实上，越是懂文明礼仪的人，越能获得自由发展的广阔天地，因为他是受人们欢迎的人。
相反，如果缺乏教养，不懂文明礼仪，人们采取不欢迎的态度，又怎么能发展事业，立足社会
做文明之人，就要会用文明语，做文明事。
再简单地讲就是要懂礼貌，明事理。
中国素有“礼仪之邦”之称，礼貌待人是中华民族的传统美德。
生活在幸福时代的我们，如果不能继承和发扬这种优良传统，就不能真正做一个快乐的人。
“良言入耳三冬暖，恶语伤人六月寒”，这句俗话大家要记住。
文明礼貌是最容易做到的事，同时也是生活里最重要的事，它比最高的智慧，比一切的学问都重要。
礼貌经常可以替代最珍贵的感情。
同学之间也离不开礼仪，它就像润滑油，使粗糙的摩擦消失，如果有矛盾，应该多进行自我反省，互相理解、宽容待人。
那么，怎样才能成为有教养的人呢
让我们从以下几个方面去努力吧。
首先，注重个人的仪容仪表、仪态举止、谈吐、着装等。
从仪容仪表说，要求整洁干净：脸、脖颈、手都应洗得干干净净；头发按时理、经常洗；指甲经常剪；注意口腔卫生，不当众嚼口香糖；经常洗澡、换衣服，消除身体异味。
从仪态举止说，要从站、坐、行以及神态、动作等方面严格要求自己，古人对人体姿态曾有形象的概括：“站如松，行如风，坐如钟，卧如弓。
”优美的站姿给人以挺拔、精神的感觉；坐姿要端正挺直、大方得体；走路要挺胸抬头，肩臂自然摆动，步速适中；表情神态要表现出对人的尊重、理解和善意，面带微笑；谈吐要态度诚恳、亲切，使用文明用语，简洁得体。
着装要干净、整洁、得体，符合学生身份，体现出新世纪学生蓬勃向上的风采。
其次，注意公共场所礼仪。
公共场所礼仪包括在学校、教室、宿舍、影剧院等场所的礼仪，还有走路、问路、乘车、购物等方面。
校园礼仪十分重要，在教室和宿舍，要遵守公共秩序，不能大声喧哗。
课堂礼仪对老师的教学影响很大，它直接关系着一个班的荣誉与凝聚力，体现这个班的班风班貌。
上课时要提前到教室进入准备状态，课堂上要积极配合老师搞好教学活动，下课后的休息时间，不随地吐痰、乱扔纸屑，不拿粉笔头玩，上下楼梯一律右行，见老师和客人要用普通话主动问好，不能视而不见。
另外，我们还应该爱护花草树木和一切设施，不穿越绿化带，爱护清洁卫生，服从老师管理和接受值周生文明监督岗及其他人的批评、劝阻。
受到老师的帮助，应主动诚恳地说谢谢。
求人帮助之后，一定要说：“谢谢”。
如遇他人求助，应尽力给予帮助，如不能解决时，应说：“很抱歉。
”到商店购物，不可以“上帝”自居，要用礼貌语言，购物之后也应说谢谢。
看他人演出，要尊重演员，适时礼貌鼓掌，不能提前退场。
乘坐公共汽车、火车，要照顾老人、小孩和残疾人，要保持车上卫生环境，不乱扔东西，上车不要争抢座位。
同学们，文明礼仪就在我们的日常生活之中，就在我们身边。
让我们大家都提高自己的礼仪意识，重视礼仪，按学校要求坚持训练，发现自己的不足，及时改正不讲文明礼仪的行为。
只有这样，才能使自己逐步养成文明礼仪习惯，成为有气质、有风度、有教养的现代文明人。
同学们，让我们共同祝愿，祝愿我们的生活处处开满文明之花
祝愿我们自己一步步地迈向文明
做文明之人，永远的呼唤
一生的追求
学生“反对迷信，反对邪教”演讲稿
说实话我是COPY的.你看看能不能用把.A religion is a system of human thought which usually includes a set of narratives, symbols, beliefs and practices that give meaning to the practitioner's experiences of life through reference to a higher power, deity or deities, or ultimate truth.[1] Religion is commonly identified by the practitioner's prayer, ritual, meditation, music and art, among other things, and is often interwoven with society and politics. It may focus on specific supernatural, metaphysical, and moral claims about reality (the cosmos and human nature) which may yield a set of religious laws, ethics, and a particular lifestyle. Religion also encompasses ancestral or cultural traditions, writings, history, and mythology, as well as personal faith and religious experience.The term religion refers to both the personal practices related to communal faith and to group rituals and communication stemming from shared conviction. Religion is sometimes used interchangeably with faith or belief system,[2] but it is more socially defined than personal convictions, and it entails specific behaviors, respectively.In the frame of western religious thought,[3] religions present a common quality, the hallmark of patriarchal religious thought: the division of the world in two comprehensive domains, one sacred, the other profane.[4] According to the futurist Raymond Kurzweil, The primary role of traditional religion is deathist rationalization—that is, rationalizing the tragedy of death as a good thing.[5] Religion is often described as a communal system for the coherence of belief focusing on a system of thought, unseen being, person, or object, that is considered to be supernatural, sacred, divine, or of the highest truth. Moral codes, practices, values, institutions, tradition, rituals, and scriptures are often traditionally associated with the core belief, and these may have some overlap with concepts in secular philosophy. Religion is also often described as a way of life or a life stance Religion and the body politicA good understanding of the meaning of Christianity before the word religion came into common usage can be found in St. Augustine's writing. For Augustine, Christianity was a disciplina, a rule just like that of the Roman Empire. Christianity was therefore a power structure opposing and superseding human institutions, a literal Kingdom of Heaven. Rather than calling one to self-discipline through symbols, it was itself the discipline taught by one's family, school, church, and city authorities.[11] However at this point the root of the English word religion, the Latin religio, was in use only to mean reverence for God or the gods, careful pondering of divine things, piety (which Cicero further derived to mean diligence[12]); in other words, there was no sense of a system nor even of the Christian power structure but only of spirituality.[13] Max Müller characterized many other cultures around the world, including Egypt, Persia, and India, as having a similar power structure at this point in history. What we would call religion today, they would only call law.[14]As Christianity became commonplace, the charismatic authority identified by Augustine, a quality we might today call religiousness, had a commanding influence at the local level. This system persisted in the Byzantine Empire following the East-West Schism, while Western Europe regulated unpredictable expressions of charisma through the Roman Catholic Church. However, as the Church lost its dominance during the Protestant Reformation and Christianity became closely tied to political structures, religion was recast as the basis of national sovereignty, and religious identity gradually became a less universal sense of spirituality and more divisive, locally defined, and tied to nationality.[15] It was at this point that religion was dissociated with universal beliefs and moved closer to dogma in both meaning and practice. However there was not yet the idea of dogma as personal choice, only of established churches.Religious freedomIn the Age of Enlightenment, the idea of Christianity as the purest expression of spirituality was supplanted by the concept of religion as a worldwide practice.[16] This caused such ideas as religious freedom, a reexamination of classical philosophy as an alternative to Christian thought, and more radically Deism among intellectuals such as Voltaire. Much like Christianity, the idea of religious freedom was exported around the world as a civilizing technique, even to regions like India that had never treated spirituality as a matter of political identity.[17] In Japan, where Buddhism was still seen as a philosophy of natural law,[18] the concept of religion and religious freedom as separate from other power structures was unnecessary until Christian missionaries demanded free access to conversion, and when Japanese Christians refused to engage in patriotic events.[19]With the Enlightenment religion lost its attachment to nationality, but rather than being a universal social attitude, it was now a personal feeling, or emotion.[20] Friedrich Schleiermacher in the late 18th century defined religion as das schlechthinnige Abhängigkeitsgefühl, commonly translated as a feeling of absolute dependence.[21] His contemporary Hegel disagreed thoroughly, defining religion as the Divine Spirit becoming conscious of Himself through the finite spirit.[22] William James is an especially notable 19th century subscriber to the theory of religion as feeling.Confucianism, Taoism, and Buddhism are one, a painting in the litang style portraying three men laughing by a river stream, 12th century, Song DynastyModern currents in religionReligious studiesWith the recognition of religion as a category separate from culture and society came the rise of religious studies. Clifford Geertz's definition of religion as a cultural system was dominant for most of the 20th century and continues to be widely accepted today.Sociologists and anthropologists tend to see religion as an abstract set of ideas, values, or experiences developed as part of a cultural matrix. For example, in Lindbeck's Nature of Doctrine, religion does not refer to belief in God or a transcendent Absolute. Instead, Lindbeck defines religion as, a kind of cultural and\\\/or linguistic framework or medium that shapes the entirety of life and thought… it is similar to an idiom that makes possible the description of realities, the formulation of beliefs, and the experiencing of inner attitudes, feelings, and sentiments.”[23] According to this definition, religion refers to one's primary worldview and how this dictates one's thoughts and actions. Thus religion is considered by some sources to extend to causes, principles, or activities believed in with zeal or conscientious devotion concerning points or matters of ethics or conscience, and not necessarily including belief in the supernatural.[24]Although evolutionists had previously sought to understand and explain religion in terms of a cultural attribute which might conceivably confer biological advantages to its adherents, Richard Dawkins called for a re-analysis of religion in terms of the evolution of self-replicating ideas apart from any resulting biological advantages they might bestow. He argued that the role of key replicator in cultural evolution belongs not to genes, but to memes replicating thought from person to person by means of imitation. These replicators respond to selective pressures that may or may not affect biological reproduction or survival.[25] Susan Blackmore regards religions as particularly tenacious memes.[26] Chris Hedges, however, regards meme theory as a misleading imposition of genetics onto psychology.Interfaith cooperationBecause religion continues to be recognized in Western thought as a universal impulse, many religious practitioners have aimed to band together in interfaith dialogue and cooperation. The first major dialogue was the Parliament of the World's Religions at the 1893 Chicago World's Fair, which remains notable even today both in affirming universal values and recognition of the diversity of practices among different cultures. The 20th century has been especially fruitful in use of interfaith dialogue as a means of solving ethnic, political, or even religious conflict, with Christian-Jewish reconciliation representing a complete reverse in the attitudes of many Christian communities towards Jews.Secularism and criticism of religionMain articles: Criticism of religion, Antireligion, Secularism, Agnosticism, and AtheismAs religion became a more personal matter, discussions of society found a new focus on political and scientific meaning, and religious attitudes were increasingly seen as irrelevant for the needs of the European world. On the political side, Ludwig Feuerbach recast Christian beliefs in light of humanism, paving the way for Karl Marx's famous characterization of religion as the opiate of the masses. Meanwhile, in the scientific community, T.H. Huxley in 1869 coined the term agnostic, a term subsequently adopted by such figures as Robert Ingersoll. Later, Bertrand Russell told the world Why I Am Not a Christian.Atheists have developed a critique of religious systems as well as personal faith. Modern-day critics focus on religion's lack of utility in human society, faulting religion as being irrational.[27] Some assert that dogmatic religions are in effect morally deficient, elevating to moral status ancient, arbitrary, and ill-informed rules—taboos on eating pork, for example, as well as dress codes and sexual practices[28]—possibly designed for reasons of hygiene or even mere politics in a bygone era.In North America and Western Europe the social fallout of the 9\\\/11 attacks contributed in part to the appearance of numerous pro-secularist books, such as The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins, The End of Faith by Sam Harris, and God is not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything by Christopher Hitchens. This criticism is largely, but not entirely, focused on the monotheistic Abrahamic traditions.Religious beliefCentral Asian (Tocharian) and East-Asian Buddhist monks, Bezeklik, Eastern Tarim Basin, 9th-10th centuryMain article: Religious beliefReligious belief usually relates to the existence, nature and worship of a deity or deities and divine involvement in the universe and human life. Alternately, it may also relate to values and practices transmitted by a spiritual leader. Unlike other belief systems, which may be passed on orally, religious belief tends to be codified in literate societies (religion in non-literate societies is still largely passed on orally[29]). In some religions, like the Abrahamic religions, it is held that most of the core beliefs have been divinely revealed.Religious belief can also involve causes, principles or activities believed in with zeal or conscientious devotion concerning points or matters of ethics or conscience, not necessarily limited to organized religions
关于迷信的英文演讲
崇尚科学，反对邪教邪教是世界范围内的国际性问题，也是中国的历史性问题，人类的历史始终伴随着正义和邪恶的较量。
邪教普遍以宗教或其它名义为掩饰，从事反人类、反科学、反社会、反政府的勾当，是地地道道危害社会的非法组织。
在当今科学飞速发展的新时代，越来越多的高科技开始运用于我们的学习、工作和生活当中。
科技，已成为我们走向高质量生活的一座桥梁，一根绳梯。
但是，在科学进展的途中，也有许多节外生出的客观原因，在阻碍、威胁着新时代的发展，其中邪教就是一块巨大的绊脚石。
邪教的产生和发展，严重地影响经济社会的协调和政治社会发展的高度。
邪教，像几滴乌黑的墨水，融入到洁净的清水当中，开始影响、污染、搅乱水自身的稳定和安逸。
其中的水就好比社会，几滴墨水的融入，就会把整个社会搅浑，然后在其中慢慢地发展，逐渐变到不可收拾、无法管束的地步。
邪教，像一把犀利的剑，外表招摇而充满诱惑，一旦刺中人的心，便无一生还。
这把剑中带着迷信，诱骗的成份。
如果一个人没有一点科学知识，不懂一点科学发展观，只知道企求上天和神佛的恩赐，贪图微薄的利益，那他就会很容易地被这把剑刺中心脏，在污浊中毁灭。
也有人头脑简单，轻信别人的话，那他就很容易被骗得神魂颠倒，晕头转向，迷失了方向后一直朝着错误的方向往前走，不知悔改，他要把原本纯净的心灵染黑，也是如此的轻而易举。
随着经济的发展，社会的进步，科学日新月异。
科学的飞速发展，推动了社会生产力。
随
演讲稿“崇尚科学
科学，是指引走出迷航的灯塔；愚昧，是引导陷入困境的导航。
所以今天我演讲的题目是：将愚昧埋葬 让科学闪光 科学与无知：一个古老而崭新的话题： 汲取传统的精华，才拥有牢固的根基；反映时代的精神，才能引领时代的风尚。
以崇尚科学为荣，以愚昧无知为耻，以科学为规范的道德价值取向，必然闪耀着社会主义道德的时代光芒，也必然成为广大人民群众反对愚昧的行动纲领和正确导航。
科学技术是第一生产力，科学思想是重要的精神力量。
民族要自立，国家要富强，就必须用“崇尚科学、反对愚昧”的精神来净化我们的思想，从而大力提高全民族的科学文化素养。
毫无疑问，崇尚科学、反对愚昧，就是我们应有的品质；“以崇尚科学为荣、以愚昧无知为耻”，就是我们思想道德修养的基本方向，就是我们每个公务员都应牢固树立的荣辱观与行动总纲。
以崇尚科学为荣、以愚昧无知为耻，是工人阶级政党的政治信仰\\\/对党员道德修养的\\\/必然要求。
正所谓：有道则阳，无道则暗。
有理则顺，无理则逆。
道理明，是非清，民心合，天下必昌。
牢固树立并坚持这个科学的世界观，就会撩开历史凝重的暴风雨，留下铜鼓和太阳；收集颤动的音响，谱写令人振奋\\\/铿锵激昂的时代乐章
以崇尚科学为荣、以愚昧无知为耻，是加强党的执政能力建设和先进性建设的必然要求。
新时期的共产党人，应该是用先进世界观、价值观、人生观，以及先进科学文化知识武装起来的先进分子。
愚昧无知，就是一种对于自然力量和社会力量的畏惧与屈服。
科学则为我们认识已知世界提供着越来越多的知识和手段，同时也在揭示着越来越广阔深邃的未知世界。
以崇尚科学为荣、以愚昧无知为耻，是完成党所肩负的历史使命的必然要求。
当今世界，科学知识更新的速度越来越快，科学知识转化为生产力的频率也越来越高，这就要求广大党员干部必须努力去掌握各种种科学文化知识，特别是我们工商行政管理干部更要以理论、“三个代表”重要思想和科学发展观为指导，进一步规范工作行为，提高工作效能，努力营造良好的服务环境、法治环境、行政环境、诚信环境、市场环境和舆论环境，全面推行“八项制度”，从每个人做起，努力站在科学发展的前沿，全面地贯彻落实科学发展观，实现跨越式发展，创造物质财富和精神财富，改善人民生活，增强综合国力，全面建设小康社会，为我们的祖国奋斗不惜，为我们的职责一生无悔
不要再为落叶伤感，为春雨掉泪；也不要满不在乎地挥退夏日的艳阳，让残冬的雪来装饰自己的面纱；岁月可使皮肤起皱，而愚昧无知，则使灵魂起皱。
愚昧只能拖后历史的脚步，阻挡前进的力量，而科学才是使历史前进的真正动力，所以让我们从我做起，从现在开始 以崇尚科学为荣、以愚昧无知为耻，用科学将愚昧埋葬，让科学永远闪着不灭的光芒
我的演讲完毕，谢谢大家
求一篇《我们为什么要学习》的演讲稿
我为什么要学习
我为什么要学习
无数次问自己这个问题，却没有满意的答案． 如果说学习是为了以后找工作，我这样对自己说—— 如果，在这个世界上我再无别的牵挂，或者我有足够的钱可以给我的爸爸妈妈，也许，我回选择流浪，毫无牵挂地走开，或者，我选择隐居，离开喧嚣的人世，不在疲惫地和人交往。
这种假设不成立，所以我还是要学习。
当学习成为一种乐趣，我想，我会很乐意地把自己交给书本，可是，我早已经过了把学习当作乐趣的年纪，早已不习惯了学习。
有时候真的很痛恨自己的堕落和空虚，却再无勇气拿起学习的勇气。
我已经成了学习的奴隶，被考试追赶地狼狈不堪。
因为责任，我不想放纵自己，不想让父母看到他们曾经成绩优秀的女儿现在不堪的成绩。
我想努力，想奋斗，可是，我的行为远离了我的心，而我的心，也已经是收不回来了。
其实读书可以作为消遣，可以作为装饰，也可以增长才干。
孤独寂寞时，阅读可以消遣。
高谈阔论时，知识可供装饰。
处世行事时，知识意味着才干。
懂得事务因果得人是幸运的。
有实际经验的人虽能够处理个别性的事务，但要综观整体，运筹全局，只有学识才能办到。
读书的目地是为了认识事物原理。
为挑剔辩驳去读书是无聊的。
但是不能过于迷信于书本。
求知的目的不是为了吹嘘炫耀，而应该是为了寻找真理，启迪智慧。
其实学习是对外界认知的过程，不学习就什么都不知道，为了父母的期望，为了自己的将来，为了过的更好一些，所以我们应该这样做。
人类思维由感性思维和理性思维之分，“感时花溅泪，恨别鸟惊心”，这是人类感性思维的美好表现，《孙子兵法.谋攻篇》说:“上兵伐谋,其次伐交,其次伐兵,其下攻城。
”这是人类理性思维的极高境界。
感性思维是“爱”、“恨”、“愉快”、“悲伤”等感情部分，理性思维则是“演绎”、“归纳”、“推理”、“论证”等理性思考部分。
理性思维在择业、在消费、在投资、在交往等多方面对于成人来讲都具有重大的价值。
缺少理性的人往往不能独立的作出科学的判断和选择，在重大问题的处理上往往是一个失败的人。
缺少求实的精神，缺少科学的素养，缺少理性的思维的人严格的说是一个不完整的人，是一个发展不完善，是一个不健全的人。
在此意义上讲，学习物理对人的发展起着至关重要的作用
