《飞屋环游记》观后感100字左右
其实年轻的时候，人有自己的梦想，是你能不能把这个梦持到底。
[飞屋]功在于，它把这个故事说好了，说圆了。
为什么要去天堂瀑布
因为小时候的偶像是探险家，探险家的梦想在那里。
而你的初恋女孩，和你有一个同样的梦想。
后来你和她结婚了，但是梦想不停地被生活的现实打断——你这辈子虽然有个美好的愿望，但是实际上一直在对生活妥协。
你没有儿女，工作收入也不高，最后你老了，终于可以买了两张去天堂瀑布的机票了，但是你的伴侣已经衰老到不能起床。
最后你一个人独守空屋，成为大建设的城市中一颗倔强的钉子户。
求一篇飞屋环游记的英文观后感 大概有50-150个字的。
顺便带个翻译。
继续
Up is a slightly-left-of-center masterpiece. The emotional impact of the beautiful, wordless summation of Carl's life that opens the movie is the bass note that resonates through the whole film and is at least as affecting as the scene in Wall-E when he holds his own hands while watching Hello Dolly. The rest of the movie, of course, is breathtaking on just about every level, especially the tactile quality of all the characters and textures and the completely realized weather effects and action scenes. With no new technical milestones (fur in Monsters, Inc., water in Finding Nemo, realistic camera effects in Wall- E), the design is the main focus, from the hilariously stylized characters to the amazing setting of the tepui. I know----that's a interesting trip!
求一篇飞屋环游记的英文观后感，100字左右感激不尽。
书的读后感：Robinson Crusoe is a beautiful novel that was written by Daniel Defoe, it was first published in 1719. It was arguably the first novel to ever be published which is no suprise given the date! The book really is superbly written throughout and I found it a real pleasure to read. The novel is about 270 pages and contains an epilogue. Daniel Defoe is seen by many to be one of the most famous writers in English Literature and after reading this novel it is easy to see why; I would really recommend it. The novel is actually a fiction autobiography about the man named Robinson Crusoe. He is a man who is the sole survivor of a shipwreck just off Venesuila and he encounters many things across his journey before actually being rescued. He is stranded on an island that is no way near any ships and the island is completely unihabited. Robinson Crusoe can't stand it at first but he then manages to make this horrible island into a paradise of his own. He was stranded on this island for 24 years with out any company but he then one day rescued a prisoner and things change. The novel is supposedly based on facts and so is a fictional novel. I really found the plot line to be superb throughout the novel and I found it easy to follow. The novel is beautifully written and very well structured really adding to the excellence. If you like tropical island get away novels or films rather like The lord of the flies I would really recommend this novel. I hope this was useful and thank you very much for reading. 的英文观后感I'm a little annoyed with Up right now, because it made me cry in the first 10 minutes. Crying at the end of a movie is easier to hide -- you can mutter about allergies or how too much computer time makes your eyes red. But crying at the beginning of the movie makes you feel like an awfully sappy wuss. Thank goodness I had big ol' 3-D glasses on, which at least managed to hide any telltale traces of weakness ... until I cried again at the end, damn it.Up is the latest film from Pixar, and this time the main character is not a robot or rat or monster, but rather a little old man who looks like Spencer Tracy and occasionally growls like Clint Eastwood in Gran Torino. After his wife dies, Carl Fredericksen (Ed Asner) faces a lonely life ahead, possibly in a retirement community. He decides to have the adventure that he and his wife always dreamed of, and sets out for the quasi-legendary Paradise Falls in South America. His method of travel? The family home, lifted by an amazing canopy of balloons. However, he isn't alone ... he's inadvertently picked up an enthusiastic 8-year-old Wilderness Explorer, Russell (Jordan Nagai), who only wants to help.As the movie progresses, Carl's house stops being a means for escape and adventure, and turns into a burden that the two explorers have to drag around with them. And the movie shifts from a sweet and slightly fantastic story about how an older man copes with loneliness and regret, into a comic action-adventure tale with a setting and characters that would be right at home in Warner Bros. cartoons, especially the Road Runner series. Only instead of Wile E. Coyote, Carl and Russell find the explorer who inspired Carl when he was Russell's age, Charles Muntz (Christopher Plummer).Up moves smoothly from romance to drama to fantasy to comedy to action-adventure and then back to sentimental drama again, without jolting your emotions around too much. The sentimental parts are sweet but not cloying or overdone. On the other hand, the Carl-Russell relationship seemed a little too familiar to me, something we've encountered for decades, from Dennis the Menace to Bad Santa, without offering much that is new. I also would have liked Muntz to be a little less two-dimensional, so to speak. However, as a friend pointed out, Carl and Muntz have a wonderful dynamic that may remind you of not only Spencer Tracy but Kirk Douglas, together at last.Co-director Pete Docter also directed Monsters, , another Pixar comedy with some sweet moments and even a few that have you complaining about the allergies and the way that screen glare can make your eyes water. Bob Peterson, who contributed to scripts for Finding Nemo and other Pixar movies, co-directed and wrote the screenplay and voices one of the dogs. Pixar fans will appreciate the little touches typical of the studio's films -- of course John Ratzenberger has a role, this time as a construction worker, and there are a number of quick visual jokes that are impossible to catch in a single viewing.It goes without saying, as it has for even the weaker Pixar entries, that the movie looks gorgeous. I saw Up in 3-D, found the 3-D effects to be very subtle ... so subtle that at times I wondered if parts of the film had been rendered into 3-D at all. The 3-D occasionally adds some depth of field that enhances the overall look of the movie, but for the most part you could do without it and not miss anything. I'm a little sorry that the one theater in town with 4K digital is only showing the movie in 3-D because I would love to see how a high-quality traditional screening fares in comparison.Up is good enough to be included in arguments about which Pixar film is best, although I would still fight for Ratatouille, myself. Is Up a children's film with side jokes for adults, a family film, or a film that's made for grownups but has many elements that children also can enjoy? At times it seems to fit in any of these categories as well as others -- it would be a great date film -- but ultimately it boils down to being a very good movie that defies demographic categorization. In other words, if you're old enough to sit quietly through a feature film, go see it. (And bring tissues.)的英文观后感2In its opening stretch the new Pixar movie “Up” flies high, borne aloft by a sense of creative flight and a flawlessly realized love story. Its on-screen and unlikely escape artist is Carl Fredricksen, a widower and former balloon salesman with a square head and a round nose that looks ready for honking. Voiced with appreciable impatience by Ed Asner, Carl isn’t your typical American animated hero. He’s 78, for starters, and the years have taken their toll on his lugubrious body and spirit, both of which seem solidly tethered to the ground. Even the two corners of his mouth point straight down. It’s as if he were sagging into the earth. More About This MovieOverview Tickets & Showtimes New York Times Review Cast, Credits & Awards Readers' Reviews Trailers & ClipsView Clip...Buy From Amazon Skip to next paragraph Skip to next paragraph Enlarge This ImagePixar Animation Studios and Walt Disney PicturesCarl Fredericksen checking out some new neighbors in “Up.” MultimediaInteractive Feature ‘Up,’ Inside and Out RelatedWell-Rounded Boy, Meet Old Square (May 17, 2009) Pixar’s Art Leaves Profit Watchers Edgy (April 6, 2009) Enlarge This ImagePixar Animation Studios and Walt Disney PicturesAlong for the ride is Russell, voiced by Jordan Nagai. Eventually a bouquet of balloons sends Carl and his house soaring into the sky, where they go up, up and away and off to an adventure in South America with a portly child, some talking (and snarling and gourmet-cooking) dogs and an unexpected villain. Though the initial images of flight are wonderfully rendered — the house shudders and creaks and splinters and groans as it’s ripped from its foundation by the balloons — the movie remains bound by convention, despite even its modest 3-D depth. This has become the Pixar way. Passages of glorious imagination are invariably matched by stock characters and banal story choices, as each new movie becomes another manifestation of the movie-industry divide between art and the bottom line. In “Up” that divide is evident between the early scenes, which tell Carl’s story with extraordinary tenderness and brilliant narrative economy, and the later scenes of him as a geriatric action hero. The movie opens with the young Carl enthusing over black-and-white newsreel images of his hero, a world-famous aviator and explorer, Charles Muntz (Christopher Plummer). Shortly thereafter, Carl meets Ellie, a plucky, would-be adventurer who, a few edits later, becomes his beloved wife, an adult relationship that the director Pete Docter brilliantly compresses into some four wordless minutes during which the couple dream together, face crushing disappointment and grow happily old side by side. Like the opener of “” and the critic’s Proustian reminiscence of childhood in “Ratatouille,” this is filmmaking at its purest. The absence of words suggests that Mr. Docter and the co-director Bob Peterson, with whom he wrote the screenplay, are looking back to the silent era, as Andrew Stanton did with the Chaplinesque start to “.” Even so, partly because “Up” includes a newsreel interlude, its marriage sequence also brings to mind the breakfast table in “Citizen Kane.” In this justly famous (talking) montage, Orson Welles shows the collapse of a marriage over a number of years through a series of images of Kane and his first wife seated across from each other at breakfast, another portrait of a marriage in miniature. As in their finest work, the Pixar filmmakers have created thrilling cinema simply by rifling through its history.Those thrills begin to peter out after the boy, Russell (Jordan Nagai), inadvertently hitches a ride with Carl, forcing the old man to assume increasingly grandfatherly duties. But before that happens there are glories to savor, notably the scenes of Carl — having decided to head off on the kind of adventure Ellie and he always postponed — taking to the air. When the multihued balloons burst through the top of his wooden house it’s as if a thousand gloriously unfettered thoughts had bloomed above his similarly squared head. Especially lovely is the image of a little girl jumping in giddy delight as the house rises in front of her large picture window, the sunlight through the balloons daubing her room with bright color. In time Carl and Russell, an irritant whose Botero proportions recall those of the human dirigibles in “,” float to South America where they, the house and the movie come down to earth. Though Mr. Docter’s visual imagination shows no signs of strain here — the image of Carl stubbornly pulling his house, now tethered to his torso, could have come out of the illustrated Freud — the story grows progressively more formulaic. And cuter. Carl comes face to face with his childhood hero, Muntz, an eccentric with the dashing looks and frenetic energy of a younger Kirk Douglas. Muntz lives with a legion of talking dogs with which he has been hunting a rare bird whose gaudy plumage echoes the palette of Carl’s balloons. The talking dogs are certainly a hoot, including the slobbering yellow furball Dug and a squeaky-voiced Doberman, Alpha (both Mr. Peterson), not to mention the dog in the kitchen and the one that pops open the Champagne. And there’s something to be said about the revelation that heroes might not be what you imagined, particularly in a children’s movie and particularly one released by Disney. (Muntz seems partly inspired by Charles Lindbergh at his most heroic and otherwise.) But much like Russell, the little boy with father problems, and much like Dug, the dog with master issues, the story starts to feel ingratiating enough to warrant a kick. O.K., O.K., not a kick, just some gently expressed regret.的英文观后感3Given the inherent three-dimensional quality evident in Pixar's cutting-edge output, the fact that the studio's 10th animated film is the first to be presented in digital 3-D wouldn't seem to be particularly groundbreaking in and of itself.But what gives Up such a joyously buoyant lift is the refreshingly nongimmicky way in which the process has been incorporated into the big picture -- and what a wonderful big picture it is.Winsome, touching and arguably the funniest Pixar effort ever, the gorgeously rendered, high-flying adventure is a tidy 90-minute distillation of all the signature touches that came before it.It's also the ideal choice to serve as the first animated feature ever to open the Festival de Cannes, considering the way it also pays fond homage to cinema's past, touching upon the works of Chaplin and Hitchcock, not to mention aspects of It's a Wonderful Life The Wizard of Oz and, more recently, About Schmidt.Boxoffice-wise, the sky's the limit for Up.Even with its PG rating (the first non-G-rated Pixar picture since The Incredibles), there really is no demographic that won't respond to its many charms.The Chaplin-esque influence is certainly felt in the stirring prelude, tracing the formative years of the film's 78-year-old protagonist, recent widower Carl Fredricksen (terrifically voiced by Ed Asner).Borrowing WALL-E's poetic, economy of dialogue and backed by composer Michael Giacchino's plaintive score, the nostalgic waltz between Carl and the love of his life, Ellie, effectively lays all the groundwork for the fun stuff to follow.Deciding it's better late than never, the retired balloon salesman depletes his entire inventory and takes to the skies (house included), determined to finally follow the path taken by his childhood hero, discredited world adventurer Charles F. Muntz (Christopher Plummer).But he soon discovers there's a stowaway hiding in his South America-bound home in the form of Russell, a persistent eight-year-old boy scout (scene-stealing young newcomer Jordan Nagai), and the pair prove to be one irresistible odd couple.Despite the innate sentimentality, director Pete Docter (Monsters, ) and co- director-writer Bob Peterson keep the laughs coming at an agreeably ticklish pace.Between that Carl\\\/Russell dynamic and Muntz's pack of hunting dogs equipped with multilingual thought translation collars, Up ups the Pixar comedy ante considerably. Meanwhile, those attending theaters equipped with the Disney Digital 3-D technology will have the added bonus of experiencing a three-dimensional process that is less concerned with the usual comin' at ya razzle-dazzle than it is with creating exquisitely detailed textures and appropriately expansive depths of field.There’s nothing better than an easy review: Pixar’s latest summer offering, UP, is a fantastic film. Simply fantastic. Seriously, if Ratatouille and Wall-E deserved to be in the running for Best Picture of the Year (as many said they did at the times of their releases) then UP certainly does.It’s that good.屋环游记的英文观后感4 The film - which was written by Bob Peterson (Finding Nemo, Ratatouille) and directed by Peter Docter (Monsters, ) - delivers all the things we’ve come to expect from a Pixar animated feature: gorgeous visuals, a strong story rife with moral lessons and (gasp) good character development; humor both low-brow (for the kids) and high-brow (for the grownups), with strokes of bold wit and a dash of sagely wisdom for good measure.And yet, UP also delivers something quite unexpected: Pixar’s most adult-oriented story yet, slyly disguised in a fantastic adventure tale.UP tells the life story of Carl Fredricksen (the unmistakable voice of Ed Asner), a shy little boy who grows up in (1930s?) America, an era in which people pack into movie theaters to watch news reels about adventurous explorers like Charles Muntz, who travels the world on one epic quest after the next.Young Carl Fredricksen idolizes Muntz: He spends his lonely days roaming his neighborhood pretending to be Muntz until one day he runs into Ellie, an energetic and fearless young girl (everything Carl is not) who idolizes Charles Muntz just as much as Carl does. Ellie and Carl cross their hearts then and there and swear to be great adventurers like Charles Muntz, and with that oath, theirs is a match made in heaven.After that fateful first encounter, we get a truly beautiful montage of Carl and Ellie’s life-long romance. We see the young kids grow into a teenage couple; see them get married and buy a house, working day jobs (balloon vendor) while saving up for the kind of adventures they fantasized about as kids. We watch the couple deal with the ups and downs, joys and tragedies of life; and gradually we watch them grow into old age, Ellie’s “My Adventures” scrapbook still unfilled, even as her time on Earth ends.With Ellie gone, Carl becomes a disgruntled old man desperately trying to hold on to a house, heirlooms and a lost-love he cherishes. A physical confrontation with neighborhood developers leads to Carl being forced into a retirement home for the rest of his days - but before the old man will give in he decides to honor the oath he and Ellie swore as kids and take one last shot at adventure! Carl ties an impossible number of balloons to his house (working a balloon cart at the zoo was his job for many years), rigs a steering system and UP he goes!
飞屋环游记英文影评
讲述了讲述了一老一少的冒险旅程。
一个名叫·的老人，一生都梦想着能、出没于异境险地体验，却平淡地渡过了一生。
在生命的最后阶段，仿佛在命运的安排下，他与一个8岁的小朋友终于踏上了冒险的旅程。
“老小兵”的奇特组合并肩闯荡江湖，共同经历了荒野跋涉、丛林野兽与反派坏蛋的狙击。
疯狂斗物城读后感150字
从我儿子有交流能力的第一天我就在忧虑一件事，就是我应该如何向他描述我们成年人的世界。
我努力地用来自全球各地的各种绘本，试图从各个层面搭建一个我心目中的可以向他这么大的孩子描述的成人世界，我用各种各样的绘本和故事向他打过各种各样的比方，但是好几年下来，我发现，其实通过绘本我可以描述的世界或许太过美好了，以至于我无法向他解释我自己身上以及中国当下那么多不能解释的种种缺陷。
6年过去了，我对这件事始终无从下手又万般焦虑，是的，我努力做的不是支离破碎就是过于片面。
绝大部分时候我已经放弃了努力，我甚至觉得他应该有他自己的方式，或许是大风大浪的奇妙探险，或者是有惊无险的峰回路转……每个人都应该有自己打开世界的方式。
直到最近，我看到《疯狂动物城》，我才发现，我错了。
给儿童世界打出的最精妙的一个比方 一直以来我最无能为力的事，迪士尼却做得如此彻底。
这部电影是迪士尼数千个创意团队成员用三四年时间和心血搭建的一个完整的动物城邦，它向孩子展示了任何一个家长完全不可能呈现的成人世界。
这个动物城邦简单而美好，残酷而真实，一个完美到令人窒息的寓言世界，在我心中它帮孩子们用平行映照成人世界的动物城邦快速架构出一个可以立刻理解和认知到真实的世界，用每一个动物角色和他们的关系，帮孩子们搭建出了完整的价值观体系。
它流畅紧凑的讲述中，永远都藏着有关人性和世界的朴素真相，而不管多飞的叙事都有着坚实的现实和心理逻辑。
《疯狂动物城》是成年人给儿童世界打出的最精妙的一个比方，它简单而真实，没有一个家长有能力去塑造这么一个与成人世界平行的世俗城邦，它完整地向你的孩子介绍了成人世界的一切美好与残酷，偏见与宽容，友谊与竞争，执着与坚持、信念与梦想…… 不是乌托邦的乌托邦 《疯狂动物城》引进之前曾经有两个译名分别是《动物大都会》和《动物乌托邦》，从英文字面意思来看，乌托邦是最贴近的，也是创作者最想表达的人一个梦想中的平行世界。
在2016年定档之前改成了《疯狂动物城》，我最早得到这个改名的消息多少有点失望。
从市场营销角度来看，乌托邦是一个有理解困境的名词，但是它太精确了，精确到我作为一个超级市场派都要为这个词让步的地步。
迪士尼并没有塑造一个所谓的完美乌托邦，即使是动物的世界，该有的所有生存的残酷与博弈、脸谱化的成见、文化与种族的各种偏见……不仅一一俱全而且毫发毕现，好的是迪士尼创作者用美好的共存和包容的愿望让乌托邦在动物世界得到了实现，这是对整个人类未来共同想象力和愿景的一个美好期待吧，这也是他们在内心愿意把一个真实而又值得期待的未来美好世界留给孩子们的一种展现。
一想到数千个人都在这样的愿望中共同努力创作的场景，就让人不禁心有戚戚焉。
做一个体面的普通人 在《疯狂动物城》这部电影里最大的slogan就是“每个人都无所不能”，看起来是个简单而充满鸡血的故事，其实电影故事的主旋律却是尝试一切，并非通过主人公兔子朱迪警官的故事，展现她的灰姑娘变公主的蜕变之路，而是给孩子每一个角色和每一个进电影院的孩子一个更积极向上的信息——从自己开始改变，你一定会成为那个力所能及、实现自我的人，你也会看到更美的世界。
你要走的并不是那个砥砺前行奋发图强的草根逆袭之路，而是，每一个人都应该努力做一个体面的普通人，就算是最好的人生。
或者说，努力做好一个体面地普通人本身，就是对浮躁社会的最好逆袭。
就凭这一点，这部片就可能是迪士尼和皮克斯继《狮子王》、《海底总动员》、《飞屋环游记》、《冰雪奇缘》、《怪物工厂》，《超能陆战队》之后又一部划时代之作。
我们无法想象迪士尼和出版方背后工作的复杂性，但是无论如何，我都要感谢那些我无能为力所致，他们却在幕后努力呈现出来的创意与产品，感谢创意、感谢迪士尼，你们用自己的行为在证明：一个体面的普通人是多么重要而美好，我也希望我的孩子成为这样的人。
