
看过电影(放牛班的春天)读后感(500 字)
《放牛班的春天》观后感看完《放牛班的春天》这部影片,我的心灵受到了强烈的震撼。
感谢学校的安排,使我又受到了一次良好的师德教育。
四十八年前,主人公马修到一家学校担任学监,这个学校被成为池塘之底,这个学校由调皮的孩子,残忍的校长,冷酷的教师,严厉的制度构成。
马修怀着一颗仁爱之心看待这些孩子,对学校残忍的“行动—反应”制度深恶痛绝。
他热爱音乐创作,他用爱心关怀孩子,在他的执着下,费尽心思组成了一个合唱团,为他们谱曲,用音乐引导他们的心灵。
当然,最后的结果是音乐净化了孩子的心灵,也对他们的人生带来了巨大的影响。
这部影片采用了倒叙的方式,当年合唱团中的领唱莫杭治后来成了指挥家(当然,他的成就是因为当年马修发现了他在音乐方面的天赋),因为母亲病逝回家的时候,当年合唱团的伙伴佩尔诺来找他,给了他一本马修的日记。
马修在日记中记载了这感人的一切。
佩尔诺当时是个孤儿,总在周六的时候等在大门口,希望父亲会来接他。
后来马修被学校解雇了,当他要登上汽车的时候,佩尔诺一路奔跑赶来,要马修带他走,马修先是拒绝,后来又不忍心,回来把佩尔诺带走了。
佩尔诺的执着是有道理的,那天正好是星期六。
看完这部影片,我为哈珊校长的粗暴残忍而愤恨;为孩子们曾经不幸的遭遇而惋惜;为孩子们遇到马修而庆幸;为马修的善良真诚而感动;为杭莫治的改邪归正而释怀;为佩尔诺的执著坚守而欢欣。
我的记忆深处从此烙下了一个不可磨灭的情节:当马修神情黯然地离开学校大门时,收到了曾经是顽劣甚至邪恶的学生在卡片上写满了的思念与祝福,那一双双挥舞着的手诉说着留恋与不舍,这一刻,马修露出了幸福的笑脸;那一刻,我流下了感动的泪水。
看了这部影片,感动之余,我也得到了深刻的启示:在我们的教育教学中,应该看到:学生都有自己的优缺点,关键要看怎么去挖掘,怎么去教育,充分挖掘孩子的优点天赋潜能和爱心,孩子才能很好地成长起来。
这部法国影片中马修的行为,杭莫治的成材,佩尔诺的成长,有力地印证了我国著名教育家陶行之先生的一句话:“漫天撒下爱心种,伫看他日结果时”。
因此这部影片值得我们观看,更值得我们品位(味)。
[推荐] 学校师德建设系列专题--《放牛班的春天》观后感四则[日期:2005-11-08] 来源: 作者: [字体:大 中 小] 教育者:请用好你的牧鞭——法国影片《放牛班的故事》观后中山纪念中学 黄长飞不必凄婉哀恻,无须生离死别,一种柔和的、温婉的、诙谐的生活故事同样可以给我们以感动和心灵的震撼,这就是法国影片《放牛班的故事》给予我的最直接的启示。
感动,因为平凡的小人物克莱门特·马修那颗博大的爱心;震撼,因为艺术的力量竟是如此巨大,让多少冥顽的灵魂得到救赎。
《放牛班的故事》,是这样一部影片,没有任何一丁点的色情和暴力,而是那样的阳光和健康,却同样的扣人心弦、引人入胜。
这是一部关于事业与成功、教育与成才的影片,在欣赏着优美音乐的同时,相信为人父母和为人师长者还都会有思想上的不菲收获。
我不懂法语,不知道“放牛班”是法文的直译还是综合了中文的意译,但是我们都知道,在中国常把对学生不加区分、放任自流的教育和管理称作“放羊”,并且当我们这么说时,可能同时也意味着教育者的不负责任和被教育者的不可救药。
我想“放牛”当与此相类。
的确,“池塘底学校”虽然名为学校,实际却是“教养院”,这里聚集了众多的问题少年,偷盗、说谎、抽烟、搞恶作剧对他们而言都是家常便饭;同时,这里还有一个浅薄、势利而冷酷的“铁血”校长,一个把“犯规——处罚”奉为圭臬的教师。
在这里你看不到教育、教化的影子,那厚重的大门、特定时间特定地点的会客安排、关禁闭罚劳役的处罚等近乎军事化的管理使这里更像是一座监狱而不是学校。
但这一切,都因为一个“失败”的音乐家,“小小”的带课老师克莱门特·马修的到来而改变。
马修是这样的其貌不扬,他没有魁梧的身材,没有英俊的面容,再加上秃顶的脑袋让他看起来甚至有些滑稽,但正是他创造了奇迹。
他从这些让所有人都失望的孩子中培养出来世界著名的指挥家“皮埃尔”,并让受他教化的学生在几十年后满怀着敬慕和热爱的心情来怀恋他,这本身就是作为一个教育者的无上光荣和莫大成就。
平凡的小人物马修之所以如此令我们感动,恰恰正在于马修的平凡和普通。
他给予我们学习的可能性,而并不简单是当作一个偶像或榜样而远远的膜拜敬仰。
“池塘底”在“铁血”校长的统治下仿佛罩上了一面密不透风的铁幕,任何的变革和尝试仿佛都是不被允许的,而马修在这种“制度下”进行了自己的探索。
当他发现这群孩子有唱“歪歌”的爱好后因势利导,成立了合唱团,并在被发现后冒着丢掉饭碗的危险进行了“制度内”的抗争,而成效是显著的:当皮埃尔内心深处对音乐的爱好被唤起,而独自在角落里唱歌;当那一群散漫不羁的孩子被音乐俘虏,而驯服的听从了马修的指挥,并大大减少了捣乱和恶作剧;当皮埃尔平生第一次懂得了感激,并因为获得原谅而窃喜……这时候,在我们感慨音乐的神奇力量的同时,也不能不想到,无论多么叛逆、任性、看起来无药可救的孩子,其实都有一把可以打开他们内心之门的钥匙,关键是教育者有没有这种愿望、有没有这种耐心来寻找这把钥匙;在今天中国的教育现状下,我们听多了一线老师对应试教育的不满、对教育积重难返的无奈,马修提供了我们思考的另一个角度:可否在无力改变大环境的情况下进行力所能及的探索
教育者固然需要技术上的探索和创新,但同时更需要博大的胸怀、宽广的爱心和对任何一个受教育者永不放弃的耐心。
马修用他博大的胸怀包容所有的孩子,包容他们所有的过错并给他们改过的机会;马修用他宽广的爱心熔化了孩子内心如冰雪般的冷漠;马修永远对每一个孩子都深怀信心,给他们最基本的信任。
一个成功的教育者必然是一个宽容而富于爱心的人,十恶不赦的孩子是没有的,即便堕落固执如蒙丹的孩子,他也自有其坦率和可爱的一面。
而鄙视疏远他们、对他们以暴制暴只能换来他们对社会的更猛烈疯狂的报复,这不能不令教育者引以为戒。
上医医国,中医医人,下医医病。
作为教育者,担负着救治灵魂的重任。
如果那些不谙世事的幼童都是纯洁而无知的羔羊,教育者就是他们的守护者和牧羊人。
我曾经写过这样的诗句:我们是否都是被放逐的羔羊慈爱的牧羊人啊请你指引我抵达上帝的牧场……牧羊人啊,一定要慎用手中的牧鞭:把迷途的羔羊唤回,更不要把他们赶入歧途……雪莱的《西风颂》中有这样的诗句:冬天来了,春天还会远吗
放牛班因为克莱门特·马修的到来而迎来了自己的春天,我相信,如果中国的“放羊班”上也多一些马修式的人物,我们也将能迎来自己的春天
《放牛班的春天》观后感鲁迅小学 梁艳很有幸,借着继续教育的机会我能和老师们一起欣赏了这部法国影片——《放牛班的春天》,一起感受着一个学监和一群问题学生之间发生的一些平淡又令人感动的故事。
这是我第一次看,看完之后真的让我好感动
这部电影虽然没有华丽的服饰和背景,没有跌宕起伏的故事情节,简单,干净的音乐贯穿着整部影片,使观众在天籁般的童声中欣赏着电影,是本影片的一大特色。
《放牛班的春天》感动了很多人,这就是电影艺术的魅力,好电影就是能让人感动,因为电影里面有我们在现实中很难得到甚至得不到的东西,比如一个能为你人生指引的老师或者是一个伯乐。
马修是一个秃顶的老师,他其貌不扬,但人倒是不坏。
他服从制度,但能在制度下尽自己所能为孩子干点事情。
他喜欢音乐,于是他便开始用音乐来教化那些问题少年们,艺术的确有其自身的魅力,但尊重同样起着决定性的作用。
课堂上他蹲在课桌旁和学生讲话的那一镜头给我留下了很深刻的印象,这一小小的举动包涵着对学生的尊重,真正看到了平等的师生关系,而现实中的我们又有多少人能蹲在课桌旁和学生讲话呢
而马修老师以其温和的作风改变着什么,让整座学校师生之间的对立缓缓消散,除了那个刻板的校长,但在某一刻他那冷酷僵死的心何尝没有松动过呢
这就是尊重的魅力、温和的魅力、情感的魅力、爱的魅力
用爱心可以试着感化迷失的羔羊,否则只能驱使迷失的羔羊步入极端,那个被冤枉的孩子蒙丹最终用同样极端的方式来回赠给寄宿学校。
毁损的不止是校舍,还有那个孩子早已残缺的心灵,这便是以暴制暴的结果。
马修不是圣人,他无力坚持自我的真理,他只是一个不成功的小人物,做着力所能及的一切。
当他矮小的背影转身离去,我们何尝没有一份无奈的苍凉。
让我很受感动的是合唱团表演的那一刻,那个最具有音乐天赋的男孩因为过错被晾在一边,心情沮丧,神情显得格外落寞。
而第一节音乐结束时老师突然转向男孩示意他演唱,男孩很惊讶更惊喜,而后带着一种幸福的满足感完成了他的演唱。
一位老师可以让一个孩子得到对自己的肯定,对人生的期待,真的很伟大
但并不是每一个老师都是伟大的,也不是每个人都能在人生旅途中遇到伯乐的,可虽然如此,每一位孩子都渴望着在自己的人生路上能遇见这样一位老师,这样一位给自己最多帮助的人。
能够遇上便是一种幸福,尽管这种幸福在现实中显得这样的奢侈,但是我们仍然会渴求得到。
而做这种教师又何尝不是一种幸福呢
像马修,虽然被校长开除了,但那一双双从窗口伸出的小手,那一个个写满了孩子最真挚祝福的纸飞机已足以让他感动,让他幸福
但愿普天下所有的老师都能用尊重、用温和、用爱心、用情感去感动学生,都能得到学生的认可,都能收到孩子们的纸飞机,写满了祝福与期盼的纸飞机
在三尺讲台前真正实现自己的人生价值
放牛班的春天观后感
放牛班的春天观后感600字 放牛班的春天>观后感600字(一) 很有幸,借着继续教育的机会我能和老师们一起欣赏了这部法国影片——《放牛班的春天》,一起感受着一个学监和一群问题学生之间发生的一些平淡又令人感动的>故事。
这是我第一次看,看完之后真的让我好感动
这部电影虽然没有华丽的服饰和背景,没有跌宕起伏的故事情节,简单,干净的音乐贯穿着整部影片,使观众在天籁般的童声中欣赏着电影,是本影片的一大特色。
《放牛班的春天》感动了很多人,这就是>电影艺术的魅力,好电影就是能让人感动,因为电影里面有我们在现实中很难得到甚至得不到的东西,比如一个能为你人生指引的老师或者是一个伯乐。
马修是一个秃顶的老师,他其貌不扬,但人倒是不坏。
他服从制度,但能在制度下尽自己所能为孩子干点事情。
他喜欢音乐,于是他便开始用音乐来教化那些问题少年们,艺术的确有其自身的魅力,但尊重同样起着决定性的作用。
课堂上他蹲在课桌旁和学生讲话的那一镜头给我留下了很深刻的印象,这一小小的举动包涵着对学生的尊重,真正看到了平等的师生关系,而现实中的我们又有多少人能蹲在课桌旁和学生讲话呢
而马修老师以其温和的作风改变着什么,让整座学校师生之间的对立缓缓消散,除了那个刻板的校长,但在某一刻他那冷酷僵死的心何尝没有松动过呢
这就是尊重的魅力、温和的魅力、情感的魅力、爱的魅力
用爱心可以试着感化迷失的羔羊,否则只能驱使迷失的羔羊步入极端,那
放牛班的春天英文观后感
1“”“The Chorus” is a movie you have seen many times before. Cute, well-acted and utterly predictable, Christophe Barratier's feature debut delivers just what the advertising promises: a musician who has given up on fame takes a job as supervisor at a school for hard cases, and when he teaches the boys how to sing, they mellow out and begin to love him dearly.Fond d'Etang, the name of the school run with iron fist by the stern Rachin (Francois Berleand), translates as Rock Bottom,” but round-faced Clement (Gerard Jugnot) holds on to his good cheer. His cuddly exterior betrays a warm intelligence--apparently he knows that he is in the kind of movie where a little art will certainly tame the teenage beasts, and so he sorts the boys by their voices and starts a choir. All the necessary types are present in the classroom: the cute small kid, the brazen thieves and hormone-addled thugs, and of course the surprisingly talented teacher's pet (Jean-Baptiste Maunier), from whose adult perspective the story is told. In the opening scene, we learn that he ends up in New York City as one of the greatest conductors in the world--just to make sure that everybody knows right away that this story has a happy end.Forgive me if I sound cynical. The Chorus is told with skill and charm, and if you like to hear golden teenage sopranos, you will love the music. If you're in the mood to be uplifted in all the usual heartwarming ways--Mr. Holland's Opus, Dead Poets' Society, Billy Elliot and scores of similar films come to mind--The Chorus will not disappoint you. Disappointing, however, is that Barratier didn't pick a fresher subject for his first film, disappointing, also, that out of all the unique and innovative films that came out of France last year, this formulaic and obvious movie was picked to represent the country at the Academy Awards.2Delightful, uplifting, beautifully acted film that fully deserved its Oscar nominations for both Best Foreign Film and Best Original Song.The BackgroundChristophe Barratier’s The Chorus (Les Choristes) was an unexpectedly huge hit in France, to the point where it has reportedly reawakened a national interest in boys’ choirs. It’s doubtful that its influence on British audiences will be quite so profound, but it’s a hugely enjoyable film that plays like Le Societe de les Poets Morts meets L’Opus de Monsieur Holland.The film was deservedly nominated for two Oscars (for Best Foreign Film and Best Original Song) and although it lost out on both awards, it did at least provide le grande spectacle of Beyoncé Knowles singing the main song at the Oscars, in French. Ooh, and indeed, la la.The StoryBased on an obscure 1945 French film, La Cage Aux Rossignols (A Cage of Nightingales), The Chorus is predominantly set in 1949. However, the film begins in the present day when a famous conductor, Pierre (Jacques Perrin) is visited by an old schoolmate, Pepinot (Didier Flamand) and together they relive the arrival at their reform school of new teacher Clement Mathieu (Gérard Jugnot).The young Pierre (Jean-Baptiste Maunier) is always in trouble, not least from the stern headmaster, Monsieur Rachin (Francois Berléand) and Mathieu takes him under his wing, particularly when he starts a choir for the boys and discovers that Pierre has a heavenly singing voice.The ActingJugnot shines as Mathieu, despite (or perhaps because of) his occasional resemblance to Mikhail Gorbachev. His scenes with the children (particularly the young Pierre and Pepinot) are extremely moving, as is his unrequited crush on Pierre’s attractive mother (Marie Bunel). The scene where he learns that she is in love with someone else is heart-breaking.There is also excellent support from the rest of the cast, from Berléand’s performance as the sadistic head to Gregory Gatignol as the school thug and Jean-Paul Bonnire as the kindly old school caretaker.However, the stand-out performance belongs to Jean-Baptiste Maunier, who really does have -as the script says- the face and voice of an angel. Maunier was allegedly plucked from a choir group having never acted before and has now become something of a sensation in France.The FormulaThe Chorus conforms neatly to the Dead Poets Society template, even down to the O Capitain, mon Capitain scene. This is no bad thing, however. The film is extremely well made and enhanced by an intelligent, witty script. Beautifully filmed by Carlo Varini with realistically austere sets, it benefits greatly from its use of original music, written for the film by Barratier and composer Bruno Coulais.In short, if you’re looking for a feel-good arthouse flick then The Chorus is the perfect film to while away the winter blues. Highly recommended.3Teaching below the college level is difficult, particularly in inner cities where there's no particular respect for learning in so many families. Shakespeare is part of the curriculum in many schools, though one wonders how effective such learning is at age 16 when maybe one out of every hundred in the adult population would go to a Shakespearean performance even if the tickets were free. If a teacher is hapless enough to get a classroom of orphans and delinquents, teaching is even more difficult. Add to this a European post-war time when orphanages would be full-up and society is still chaotic, and you have a recipe for disaster unless, perhaps, you taught a subject like soccer. That's still not all. Imagine that the teacher is assigned to a class of tough and lonely kids who are not even the same age–that varies from 8 to 13–and the guy with the chalk is not some young, handsome, athletic type that the kids might identify with but an aging, bald fellow, why, you'd say there's no hope at all. Oops, one more thing. The principal of the school, Rachin (Francois Berleand) is not at all sympathetic to the new teacher and orders that he call the school director sir.In Christophe Barratier's picture Les Choristes (The Chorus), this is exactly what happens. In 1949 Clement Mathieu (Gerard Jugnot) is assigned to a class in a Dickensian excuse for a school (actually filmed at Chateau Ravel, a medieval stone castle in the rustic province of Puy-de-Dome). He gives the Mr. Chips impression but he's not a bumbler, even if he falls on his face during his first entrance to the class. He is himself a failed and lonely musician, which adds depth to the story, particularly when he's counting on a fling with a mother of one of the students. Tossing out the French textbook, he believes that these kids can be reached not so much intellectually, but emotionally, through the universal language of music, particularly when the students themselves are actively participating. He forms these kids of diverse ages with voices from soprano to bass into a chorus, which the principal at first thinks ridiculous and never completely does a turnaround, but through the magic of music and by catering to individual talents such as that of a gifted singer, Pierre Morhange (Jean-Baptiste Maurier), he shapes up young people, accustomed to be punished by hitting and being locked up in the school dungeon, without violence.Les Choristes is a feel-good picture but to its credit evokes only a pinch of gooey sentimentality. As a former teacher, I cannot quite believe that he could be so successful with this population of castaways and, indeed, director Barratier does not let us sit in the the dynamics from A to Z–particularly how he is able to get four-part harmony from the class. Seeing the result, we simply have to take for granted that the teacher does an A-1 not only with the kids but with himself: the failed musician is invigorated by the unfolding experience and takes to composing music once again–this time for the kids. The film is framed by a scene from the present day as one of Mathieu's former students visits the gentleman who was the gifted singer fifty-five years earlier, now a conductor of classical music famed throughout Europe. All this goes to show that if you can't become a success yourself in your chosen field–musicianship in this case–you can indeed flourish as one who inspires others to fame. Les Choristes is a charming paean to a most underappreciated and underpaid profession4Audiences love films about underdogs that overcome. One of the most beloved sub-genres in film history involves a seemingly controversial or unorthodox schoolteacher sparking the inspiration of students to rise above and achieve greatness. It's a familiar story that translates to nearly any era, setting, and subject. We've seen the effect of literature on a group of boys at a New England prep school in Dead Poets Society. Inner-city teens found confidence through calculus in Stand and Deliver. And then there's the transforming power of music, as shown in movies like Mr. Holland's Opus and Music of the Heart.The French film Les Choristes (The Chorus) follows in this tradition and last year met with incredible success in its homeland, outperforming Harry Potter and other big budget film imports. Pretty impressive for the first feature film by director and composer Christophe Barratier, who adapted the screenplay from a little known 1945 film called The Cage of the Nightingales. The new movie's soundtrack features choral music by leading French composer Bruno Coulais and also became a surprise hit, contributing to an unexpected resurgence in classical youth choirs in France.Clement Mathieu (Gerard Jugnot) brings light and life to a dark placeLes Choristes is set in post-World War II France, a time of social restructuring and economic recovery from German occupation. Not many movies have adequately dealt with what the French faced in the aftermath. Considering how many children were orphaned as a result, it's not surprising that the government instated correctional houses designed to discipline with military strictness—Spare the rod, spoil the children.Gerard Jugnot, as Clement Mathieu, directs the boys choirOne such school is L'Fond de L'Etang, which literally means Rock Bottom, an old French castle that looks very much like a prison. When mild-mannered Clement Mathieu (popular French actor Gerard Jugnot) arrives to take a position as the new assistant teacher, he is immediately plunged into an educational system nightmare. His colleagues humorously introduce themselves by giving the names of the worst troublemakers. Headmaster Rachin (Francois Berleand) has the cold, hard demeanor of a warden, delivering swift punishment to anyone caught inciting trouble. And the boys behave as if discipline were an alien concept, pouring their efforts into driving the new teacher away for the next one in line to arrive.However, Mathieu is not like other teachers (after all, who else would want this job?) and he sees great potential in the students. All they know is Rachin's disciplinary motto, Action, reaction. But instead of resorting to similar violence, Mathieu demonstrates patience and love, using their taunts to teach. When he finds that the boys have some ability for singing through their schoolyard chants, he reawakens his abandoned passion for music and decides to begin a choir to promote unity and harmony. Jean-Baptiste Maunier, as Morhange, has an angelic voiceLes Choristes is a film of great beauty and sweet intentions, offering a strong theme of grace vs. punishment—compassion of the heart in contrast to the hard discipline of the law. How one seemingly small act can transform so many lives, treating the kids like people instead of criminals. The film starts off well enough, appropriately building tension between Mathieu and both the children and the headmaster. Jugnot gives his role the necessary sweetness and believability, easily allowing the audience to want to see Mathieu succeed with his good intentions and gentler methods.Unfortunately, the movie has a sloppy flow that relies too heavily on little clichés. This is a movie about transformed lives, yet the film cuts corners when it comes to the process of transformation. Mathieu decides to start a choir, and we see the first day of practice. From there, the choir's progress is generally detailed with Mathieu's occasional journal entries, and we're to believe that a group of boys go from complete inexperience to Vienna Boys Choir in a matter of two months, which for the film audience is a change from ragamuffins to star attractions in less than 30 minutes. Missing are scenes of Mathieu truly connecting with the kids, watching them light up with newfound musical passion.
《阿甘正传》读后感 要原创的
或者是《放牛班的春天》读后感 随便算一个 在线等
今天,我读了《阿甘正传》深有感触,阿甘从小脚有毛病,受尽了别人的嘲笑与污辱,但他没有气馁,没有向命运低头,坚持走路,最后竟然可以跑了。
阿甘的故事告诉我们…我也要像他一样,做个坚强的人…
放羊班的春天 的观后感
克蒙特是一个秃顶的老师,他其貌不扬,但人倒是不坏。
他服从制度,但能在制度下尽自己所能为孩子干点事情。
他喜欢音乐,于是他便开始用音乐来教化那些问题少年们,艺术的确有其自身的魅力,但尊重同样起着决定性的作用。
在这样一个号称“池塘底部”的寄宿学校,他以其温和的作风改变着什么,让整座学校的师生之间的对立缓缓消散,除了那个刻板的校长,但在某一刻他那冷酷僵死的心何尝没有松动过呢
这样的寄宿学校也就是我们中国的工读学校,同样装满了大群的问题孩子,但在电影里我看到了那个温情的克蒙特,在身边看到的是这几张在工读学校中不曾遇到过克蒙特的脸。
伯乐不是每个人都遇得到的,老师也不是每一个都是伟大的。
这是生活告诉我们的,这样的工读学校寄宿学校到处都有,这样的问题孩子到处都是,但是这样的学校里可能更多的是对问题学生天生厌恶的老师,而很少有克蒙特出现。
所以我们会感动,我们会被《放牛班的春天》感动,因为他给了一个现实中不容易得到的感动,让我们在现实中失落的心灵在观赏影片时得以抚慰。
用爱心可以试着感化迷失的羔羊,否则只能驱使迷失的羔羊步入极端,那个被冤枉的孩子蒙丹最终用同样极端的方式来回赠给寄宿学校。
毁损的不止是校舍,还有那个孩子早已残缺的心灵,这便是以暴制暴的结果。
克蒙特不是圣人,他无力坚持自我的真理,他只是一个不成功的小人物,做着力所能及的一切。
当他矮小的背影转身离去,我们何尝没有一份无奈的苍凉。
雅克贝汉这个大名鼎鼎的名字,这个在演员和导演双重身份上都取得杰出成绩的人,他让《放牛班的春天》几乎成为了又一部《天堂电影院》,同样在两部影片中担当着制片人,又同样在两部影片一个几乎相同的开篇中饰演了一位回忆者的角色,《放牛班的春天》中的音乐家,《天堂电影院》中的导演。
但是由于有《天堂电影院》这样珠玉在前,难免让《放牛班的春天》这样一部不错的电影留下暗伤,与经典失之交臂。
同样个人以为影片仍然在某些方面存在着不足,主要在于学生们对克蒙特老师的情感宣染是很不够的,特别是作为莫杭治而言,他的人生因为克蒙特而改变,却似乎一直对于他和克蒙特老师的相互情感着墨太少。
关于师生关系的电影历来让人感动,不论是《心灵捕手》、《死亡诗社》、《生命因你而动听》皆是如此,既使如搞笑的《摇滚校园》也能让人为之动情。
但法国电影就是如此与美国电影不同,他的煽情总是在平淡中积蓄,在最未处让一切升华,在落幕后尚能令人气息不平。
而《放牛班的春天》也的确能做到这一点。
电影是浪漫的,是理想化的,但是却是受欢迎的。
因为每一位孩子都渴望在自己的人生路上遇见这样一位老师,这样一位给自己最多帮助的人。
能够遇上便是一种幸福,尽管这种幸福在现实中显得这样的奢侈,但是我们仍然会渴求得到。
500字 春暖读后感
1“”“The Chorus” is a movie you have seen many times before. Cute, well-acted and utterly predictable, Christophe Barratier's feature debut delivers just what the advertising promises: a musician who has given up on fame takes a job as supervisor at a school for hard cases, and when he teaches the boys how to sing, they mellow out and begin to love him dearly.Fond d'Etang, the name of the school run with iron fist by the stern Rachin (Francois Berleand), translates as Rock Bottom,” but round-faced Clement (Gerard Jugnot) holds on to his good cheer. His cuddly exterior betrays a warm intelligence--apparently he knows that he is in the kind of movie where a little art will certainly tame the teenage beasts, and so he sorts the boys by their voices and starts a choir. All the necessary types are present in the classroom: the cute small kid, the brazen thieves and hormone-addled thugs, and of course the surprisingly talented teacher's pet (Jean-Baptiste Maunier), from whose adult perspective the story is told. In the opening scene, we learn that he ends up in New York City as one of the greatest conductors in the world--just to make sure that everybody knows right away that this story has a happy end.Forgive me if I sound cynical. The Chorus is told with skill and charm, and if you like to hear golden teenage sopranos, you will love the music. If you're in the mood to be uplifted in all the usual heartwarming ways--Mr. Holland's Opus, Dead Poets' Society, Billy Elliot and scores of similar films come to mind--The Chorus will not disappoint you. Disappointing, however, is that Barratier didn't pick a fresher subject for his first film, disappointing, also, that out of all the unique and innovative films that came out of France last year, this formulaic and obvious movie was picked to represent the country at the Academy Awards.
死亡诗社观后感400字
《死亡诗社》是一部关于成长、梦想、挑战传统的电影。
这类片子可能票房不佳但口碑肯定不错。
看完后我想到了法国《放牛班的春天》,德国《浪潮》,美国《半个尼尔森》以及印度《三傻大闹宝莱坞》、《地球上的星星》等等。
当然这些都是西方资本主义的产物。
欣赏《死亡诗社》,应当对比着来看。
首先不得不提到的是电影的中文译名,原名Dead Poets Society的意思应该理解为“朗诵已故诗人作品的团体”如果结合内容来看应当译成“春风化雨”更为恰当。
“死亡诗社”这个片名固然吸引人,但却并不贴切。
考试上名校做医生赚大钱,并非中国学生的专利。
尼尔的父亲也和一个普通中国家长一样,望子成龙,扼杀他的表演兴趣,逼他好好学习,以后上哈佛医学院,结果这小子想不开,开枪自杀了。
学校正好要找理由收拾新来的老师基廷,他搅翻了一潭水、鼓励学生张扬个性,培养爱好。
于是学校将尼尔之死归咎于他。
恰如《放牛班》中的马修老师,他通过自己独特的教育方式改变学生,虽然很努力,也取得了成效,但是迫于学校施加的巨大压力,他也不得不和基廷先生一样离开学校离开他的学生。
马修老师捡起从窗口飘出的纸条,学生站上课桌向基廷老师表达的致敬的场景,无不令我动容。
说下去,就绕不开应试教育这个沉重的话题。
虽然不只是我们独有,外国也曾经历过。
但是当他们在讨论该怎么塑造培养学生的独立人格时,我们的电影只会讲普及乡村教育,甚至编造青春期发生的事。
说起来每个人滔滔不绝,却始终不敢将镜头聚焦问题的源头——教育体制。
基廷先生不满当时的教育方法,鼓励学生大胆撕教材。
他带学生们在校史楼内聆听死亡的声音,反思生的意义;让男生们在绿茵场上大声宣读自己的理想;鼓励学生站在课桌上,用新的视角俯瞰世界。
老师自由发散式的哲学思维让学生内心产生强烈的共鸣,他们渐渐学会自己思考与求索,勇敢的追问人生的路途,甚至违反门禁,成立死亡诗社,在山洞里击节而歌
由于之前看过《浪潮》,我一直担心他们的死亡诗社最终会扯起反体制的大旗,如浪潮般席卷校园,走向失控。
任何的教学创新必将伴随着巨大的风险。
虽然美国人并未那么疯狂,但不幸还是发生了。
尼尔的死或许在意料之中,但在我们看来却见怪不怪,毕竟我们身边这样的事情发生不少。
家长望子成龙的急切心态在无形中把孩子赶上了悬崖。
逼急了,也就一死了之。
孩子在长大,时代在变,然而对孩子的培养方式仍旧停滞不前。
《三傻》中的兰彻是个非常与众不同的学生,他不死记硬背,坚持自己的学习方法,鼓动法兰与拉杜去勇敢追寻理想。
十年后,他向世人证明了自己的成功。
“一出生就有人告诉我们,生活是场赛跑,不跑快点就会惨遭蹂躏,哪怕是出生,我们都得和3亿个精子赛跑”。
现实中的教育,往往是要把我们塑造成符合现实所用的人,学生不过是送进流水线加工后再送出去的产品。
这样的教育不是要让我们去改造世界,而是要教我们习惯了被世界改造。
民众的愚昧需要用教育祛除,但是面对眼前的教育,你却只能呼喊:“Oh ,captain ,my captain!” 电影中有个情景,查理偷偷在校报上发表文章呼吁学院向女性开放,校长开大会想要揪出他。
在寂静的礼堂里突然就响起了铃声,查理拿起一部电话,可爱的对着校长说:“先生,上帝给您打来的电话,他说学院应该招收女学生
”我不禁欣然一笑,也正如兰彻公然顶撞校长“病毒”,质疑他的教学方法。
他们都勇敢地迈出了那一步。
窃以为,一个人的成长,应当伴随着其人格的独立,思想的自由。
他所做的每件事都必定经过思考,并且敢于担负责任。
这恐怕是教育的最终目的吧
千万别以为循规蹈矩一点,“现实一点”,你就会得到这个世界。
“而今真正改变世界的人,真正的成功者,并非那处在常态分布内的灰色大多数,而是那一个个不愿意默默地、绝望地生活着,而纵身一跳,站到桌子上头,去另眼看世界的人。
他们的名字叫异数。
” 电影最后定格在了基汀先生站在门口向学生道别,后事不知如何。
然而在我们身边,或许一转身,就会看到个把像基汀那样的人。
其实他们的命运不一,有的人被排斥,有的人被同化,有的人活的好好的,甚至比其他人更成功一些。
一条道路西方走了几个世纪,普世价值深入人心,而我们只用了几十年,一口吃不成胖子,教育的千般责骂虽不为过,但一切还需慢慢来。
基汀先生曾朗诵弗罗斯特的《孤独的船长,你好呀
》,“一片树林里分出两条路\\\/而我选择了人迹更少的一条\\\/从此决定了我一生的道路。
”他的教育宛若春风化雨,润物无声的留在每个人心里。
我喜欢基廷先生,有谁不喜欢生命的欢乐和心灵的自由吗
他让我们这些活死人看到了诗与真。
这就是他能够做到的,一个先知和堂吉诃德,一个永远要立志在暴风雨中航行的漂泊者。
哦,船长,我的船长
让我拥抱你
生物学纪录片观后感400字
这部影片的美几乎无法用语言形容.这是海洋的协奏曲,这是生命的交响乐,这是自然之中的歌唱,这是天地之外的细语,这是宇宙间最动听的声音.生态纪录片大师雅克.贝汉在《微观世界》、《喜马拉雅》和《迁徙的鸟》之后,又一次把深情的目光化作唯美的镜头,投向了广袤无垠的大海,为我们描绘出一幅“万类霜天竞自由”的海洋生态的瑰丽画卷.相信很多人都曾经为《放牛班的春天》、《天堂电影院》中那深沉的师生之谊和伤感的怀旧之情而感动过,雅克.贝汉演而优则导,但他独辟蹊径与众不同,一脚踏进了自然之中,以纪录片的形式向世界展示着生命最原始的美和人类文明给这些美造成的缺憾.世人都看到了这位法国艺术家独特的审美观和价值取向,他的纪录片诗情画意壮丽唯美,有一种涤荡心灵的震撼力.在雅克.贝汉的众多生态记录片中,真正亲自操刀的是《迁徙的鸟》和这部《海洋》,这也是最能体现他影像风格的两部纪录片.如果说《迁徙的鸟》把我们的目光吸引到了天空,那么《海洋》则让我们以遨游的身姿融入无边的大海.如果说《迁徙的鸟》散发着轻灵奇巧的气息,那么《海洋》则洋溢着雄浑壮美的风骨.如果说《迁徙的鸟》是以鸟的眼光看天地万物,散发着对自然的好奇和探究之情,那么《海洋》则以人的视觉感受沧海桑田变化兴衰,充满了对生命的敬畏和对地球家园的忧思,一种悲天悯人的情怀呼之欲出.占地球表面四分之三的海洋的形象从来都是壮美和神秘的,在它的面前,一切自然的形态和人类文明的痕迹都显得渺小无比.《海洋》的镜头首先从大处着眼,表现海之广大和深沉,长镜头画面和大量的远景全景构图把我们在现实中倍感模糊的大海之远和大海之深变得无比清晰.晴空万里之下的碧波浩渺,阴云密布之下的浊浪滔天,天海之际,世界之边,《海洋》把镜头的广度和深度都发挥到了我们肉眼看不到的极限,再辅以雄浑激越的配乐,分明就是对海洋的一首豪放和婉约兼顾的赞美诗.如果有幸在大银幕上观看到本片,定会体会到那种穿透心灵的壮美,那种美让人瞬间陶醉.对于人类而言,大海是辽阔无垠和刚猛无比的,但是如果放置在更广阔的空间内,它同样也是渺小和脆弱的.《海洋》先从一个孩子的视觉去感受大海之大,然后又从一只海鬣蜥的独特视觉去看人类文明对海洋生物的影响,并把地球和海洋引向了更加浩瀚无垠的宇宙,在一瞬间大海变得微不足道.在人类已探知的宇宙范围之内,唯一能孕育生命的就是地球这颗蓝色的星球,而海洋则是地球生命的起源之地.然而在广阔的宇宙中,地球不过是空气中的一粒微尘,鲜活而渺小,海洋就是这个生命体的血脉.这一大一小的对比,揭示了生命的伟大渺小并存的富于思辨性的二元对立,同时也昭示了越是渺小越值得珍惜的哲理思维.大海之小又是具体而微的.海洋中那些色彩斑斓的生命在镜头下蹁跹起舞,互相竞争,述说着生命之强和生命之美.《海洋》通过诗化的镜头和优美的配乐,为我们展示了大海中各种美丽的生命形态,大到鲸鱼,小到微生物,从海滨天空到洋底深处,从南极到北极,各种生命形态既有合作也有竞争,合作演示着自然的奇迹,竞争彰显着进化的艰难.奇妙之处,令人意趣盎然,艰难之处让人心生感动.从大到小,从小复大,《海洋》已把生命和自然述说的唯美而动人.在《海洋》的“大”和“小”的奇景之外,是人类活动对海洋的影响,这样的情怀在《迁徙的鸟》中就有所表现.严重的污染,气候变暖,以及商业利益的驱动,势必导致北冰洋航线的开辟,而人类足迹所到之处就是海洋生物的灾难,大海中最后的一片净土或许从此不再.人类以无与伦比的力量对鲸鱼、鲨鱼和海豚肆意猎杀,投下的围网困死了无数生命,鲜血染红的海水,让人不由得想到了今年奥斯卡最佳纪录片《海豚湾》.但是相比《海豚湾》,《海洋》的镜头语言是柔和而美丽的,它的重点不在于揭露人类对自然和生命的肆虐,而是从另外一个角度去展示海洋之美和自然之美,而一切美好的东西都应该值得人类去珍惜和爱护——这无疑就是雅克.贝汉创造《海洋》、《迁徙的鸟》、《微观世界》以及他参与的所有生态记录片的初衷.雅克.贝汉以唯美的镜头为记录片树立了新的标杆,他的纪录片旁白极少,用事实说话,真正做到了客观真实,而在震撼的视听之外是他对自然的爱,这才是最令人感动的地方.人们把《微观世界》、《迁徙的鸟》和《喜马拉雅》称为雅克.贝汉的“天地人三部曲”,而我更愿意看到雅克.贝汉能再创作一部关于非洲草原的生命形态的记录片,不妨和这部《海洋》一起组成雅克.贝汉亲自操刀的“天空、陆地、海洋”三部曲,那更能描绘出一幅人类之外的生命图画,让已经强大到严重威胁其他生命的人类靠边站才算是真正的“万类霜天竞自由”的和谐世界.



