《地心游记》读后感（五十字左右）
这个故事的起因仅是因为一张神秘的羊皮纸，因为我无意中破译后竟然发现曾有人到过地心，而叔叔李登布洛克教授却坚持要追随那位伟大的炼金术师“阿尔纳·萨克努塞姆”的脚步，在经人介绍后，我们又认识了一位伟大的向导，汉斯。
“我”、叔叔、汉斯，我们在地心里遇到了常人所无法想象的困难，但这并没有让我们停下脚步，反而坚持的走了下去。
李登布洛克教授有着科学而缜密的心思，甘愿为探索科学而奉献出自己的生命，他用行动来告诉我们：科学是伟大的。
汉斯，文中虽没有很多关于他的文段，但在这次的地心之旅中，这位冷静而又充满着智慧的人也有着不可磨灭的贡献。
读完这本书，我明白了很多很多，懂得了做事不能半途而废，只要还有一线希望就要好好把握住，不要轻言放弃。
虽然这个故事并不是真的，但我同时也明白了，书上的、课本上的不一定全是真的，对的，这一切的一切都需要我们自己去大胆探索。
地心游记第五章读后感50字左右
地心游记读后感 “地心游记”是一部描写冒险的书，它出自“科幻小说之父”法国作家凡尔纳之手。
这本书描写地非常精彩，全书讲述李登布洛克教授在一本古老的书籍里偶然得到了一张羊皮纸，发现前人曾到地心旅行，李登布洛克教授决心也做同样的旅行。
他和侄子从汉堡出发，到冰岛请一位向导，他们按照前人的指引，由冰岛的一个火山口下降，经过三个月的旅行，历尽艰险和种种奇观，最后回到了地面。
书中的汉斯，阿克塞尔，李登布洛克教授在地心环游了地球一周，好几次险些失去了宝贵的生命。
他们从鱼龙的嘴里死里逃生，遭遇水源的危机······最终他们终于排除万难，在一次危险的火山喷发中被炙热的炎浆喷到了地中海的斯德隆布利岛。
在跟随这本书历险的同时，我知道了许多有关地层结构及考古学的知识。
但我认为，地心没有另一个世界，只有岩浆和炽热的地核，因为地心的温度让人无法忍受，所以动植物不可以生存。
凡尔纳真了不起，一生写了六十六部小说，一共一百多万字，一百多年来，他的作品一直受到世界各国读者的喜爱。
一本好书，就是一轮太阳。
一千本好书就是一千轮太阳。
灿烂千阳，会照亮我们前进的方向，也会让这个世界所有的秘密在我们面前一览无余的展开
地心游记读书笔记
地心游记读书笔记主要讲了：阿克赛尔和他的舅舅敢于去地心探索，他们用勇敢和智慧克服了中途所发生的种种困难，最后终于成为了科学界的伟大人物。
我很佩服他们在最后奄奄一息的时候，找到了水资源。
在最后奄奄一息的时候，找到了出口。
在最后奄奄一息的时候，逃脱了怪兽的魔掌……他们这种不屈不挠的精神太令我感动了，我以后一定要以他们为榜样。
我们学习就和穿越地心一样，如果没有不屈不挠和坚持不懈的精神，就不会有好的成绩。
我以前学习很不认真，马马虎虎，总想混水摸鱼，蒙混过关，靠小聪明得到高分。
每次总是成绩提高了一点点，又掉下来一大截。
我一定要向里的阿克赛尔学习，下定决心：从今天开始，我一定上课专心致志听讲，写作业认认真检查；遇到难题绝不逃避，努力克服。
这本书给了我许多启发，让我能够及时发现自己的错误，同时也让我认识到了自身的优点。
地心游记500字一次奇妙的探险，一段动人心弦的故事，这就是享誉世界的法国科幻小说家写的《地心游记》这本书，书中的一次次故事让我既紧张又兴奋，仿佛那个人就是我一样，动人心弦的历程，奇幻的故事。
这本书讲了阿克塞尔的叔叔李登教授偶然发现了一封密码信，这封密码信被阿克塞尔解开了，喜欢探险的李登教授硬拉上阿克塞尔朝信上说的地方出发了。
他们坐了很久的火车终于来到了冰岛，出发之前他们雇了一名向导——汉斯，他们按信上说的成功的进入了地心并开始下降，虽然速度有点慢，但是他们极度缺水，正当他们绝望时，汉斯找到了救命的水，阿克塞尔鼓起了勇气继续前行，在路上，阿克塞尔迷路了一次，经过困难，李登教授终于找到了阿克塞尔。
走了许多天，他们看到了海，他们造了一艘船渡海，在海上，他们看到了巨大的史前巨兽，又遇上了强烈的暴风雨，他们艰辛的活了下来，但是却又回到了起点，在那个地方，他们得到了萨克怒萨姆的指示，成功走了出去，但是在一个地方，洞口被堵住了，他们用炸药炸开了巨石后，突然了，他们又被喷到了地面。
这一次奇幻的历险让一个优柔寡断的毛头小伙子成长为一个勇敢的年轻人，话说到这，假如有一天，一封密码信出现在你的面前，你愿意开始一场难以置信的冒险吗
地心游记读书笔记600字儒勒•凡尔纳是一位敢于坚持科学真理的勇士，更是一位善于刻画人物的文学大师。
《地心游记》的主要人物共有三个，他们性格鲜明、栩栩如生。
阿克赛尔起初是一个年仅十九岁的大孩子，在李登布罗克教授的逼迫下，他不得不离开了自己在汉堡的温暖的家，糊里糊涂地踏上了地心探险的征程。
那时的他是一个地道的叛逆英雄，脑子里除了吃和睡，没有任何想法，更不上为了荣誉和真理而献身了。
他无力把握自己的命运，只能像小说第三十二章所提到的原是海洋里的盲鱼一样随波逐流。
但是，在经历了晕眩、饥渴、黑暗、迷路、炽热等一系列考验之后，他逐渐成长了起来，并且从最初对叔叔的唯命是从，逐渐发展到与他平等地讨论问题，最后竟然对他发号施令起来。
阿克赛尔的这种变化有着典型的象征色彩。
尽管小说的三位主人公最后没有到达地心，但是凡尔纳却达到了他的目的：整个地心探险的过程，也就是阿克赛尔历尽磨难、重获新生，终于成长为一名男子汉的过程。
当然，小说还多次提到了另一人物——十六世纪占星术士沙克努塞姆。
凡尔纳对他的描写时间接的而且篇幅也不长，但他却总是指引着主人公的旅程，在推动情节上有至关重要的作用。
在小说中，凡尔纳为我们塑造了一群科学勇士和先驱者形象的同时，他自己则当之无愧地被看做是科幻小说先驱，影响了一代又一代人。
今天，世界上许多科学家都坦言，自己是受到了凡尔纳的启迪才走上科学之路的。
凡尔纳正是把科学和文学结合的科幻文学之父。
地心游记的读书笔记是19世纪法国著名的科幻小说家，我读过他的许多作品，如、、……它们都非常吸引我。
可这本《地心游记》却给我留下非常深刻的印象。
它不仅有生动的故事情节，还丰富了我的想象力……这本书主要讲了一个从小失去父母的孩子阿克赛尔，被好心的叔叔奥托·李布登克洛教授收养，他是一位地理学家。
奥托·李布登克洛教授在一本书中发现了一封阿尔纳·萨克努塞姆的密码信，破译后便知道从冰岛的斯纳菲尔山约库尔火山口下去便能到达地心
教授便带好了行李，带着侄子向冰岛斯纳菲尔山约库尔火山口进发，到了冰岛，他们在好心人的帮助下请了向导汉斯。
汉斯带着叔侄两人来到火山口，开始下降。
下降中途遇到了缺水、迷路等困境，它们都坚强地挺过去了。
在地下李布登克洛海里航行时遭遇风暴，使他们航行了几百海里却重回起点，是萨克努塞姆的指示让他们继续下降。
一次突如其来的，使他们从意大利火山口出来，回到了地面。
很多人都希望自己可以生活在温暖的环境中，希望自己不受到风吹雨打，平平安安地度过一生。
如果是这样的话，那么这样的生活也就太没意思了，人的一生应该是多姿多彩的，我们应该不断地去探索，为自己确定的目标而奋斗，坚持不懈的去努力，敢于冒险，不断地磨炼自己，勇敢地接受生活的挑战，这样才能成功。
地心游记主要内容40字
《地心游记》主要讲述的是一个德国科学家李登偶然发现了一封密码信，在解读了密码信的内容后便决定带上侄子阿克赛尔前往地心。
在真正进入地心之前，还经人介绍认识了向导。
三人从冰岛的一处火山口开始进入地心，一路上克服了迷路、缺水、暴风雨等种种在地面上难以想象的困难后，在一次后回到了地面上。
完全是按照书上手打的，希望采纳，谢谢。
急求电影《地心游记》英文版观后感
1Remove a star from the rating if you take this Journey without wearing 3-D glasses. That's where the real fun comes in. Otherwise you have a family-friendly retelling of Jules Verne's 1864 novel (best remembered is the 1959 movie with an overqualified James Mason, a shirtless Pat Boone and a gorgeous Arlene Dahl) in a romp that is lazily content to connect the dots instead of breaking new ground. Brendan Fraser is Indiana Jones stalwart and goofily charming as Trevor Anderson, a science prof who retraces the steps of his brother, who died searching for the center of the earth. With his 13-year-old nephew (Josh Hutcherson) in tow, along with a Icelandic babe (Anita Briem) in the role of guide, Trevor finds his way by carrying a copy of the book Verne wrote 144 years ago (score one for literary merit). In 2-D, it's all achingly familiar. In 3-D, the story comes alive, despite the tacky sets and gimmicks. Put on those glasses and you get toothpaste spat in your face, a T-Rex breathing up your nostrils, and what may be the longest fall in movie history. I don't know if 3-D could improve all movies (nothing could make The Love Guru funny) but it sure works here.2What makes for a successful family film? Is it memorable characters, a wealth of emotion and a unique premise? Or is it simply putting enough action on screen to make sure the adults don't get bored and the kiddies don't fall asleep? Journey to the Center of the Earth, which opens today in theaters everywhere, banks on the latter. The 92-minute film moves at a brisk pace, barely stopping for exposition as the characters hustle through a variety of different adventures thousands of miles beneath the Earth's surface. The 3-D element and B-list cast only add to the theme park feel of the entire enterprise, but that's not necessarily a bad thing. Journey to the Center of the Earth may not be concerned with a deep story and intriguing character development, but it's quite the ride nonetheless.Instead of taking its story from the novel by Jules Verne, this latest film adaptation weaves the book into the plot in a more interesting way. Trevor (Brendan Fraser) is a geeky scientist whose brother disappeared years ago while trying to find a route to the center of the Earth. When he finds a copy of Verne's novel that also contains his brother's notes, he realizes that the famed author may have been writing fact instead of fiction. Determined to find a volcanic tube that leads to the planet's core, Trevor takes his nephew Sean (Josh Hutcherson) to Iceland, where they team up with a gorgeous guide named Hannah (Anita Briem). After a long fall sends them plummeting below the Earth's surface, the trio find a land that contains a beautiful ocean, magnetic rocks, man-eating plants, an angry Tyrannosaurus Rex, and other strange wonders.Much like last year's Beowulf, the best reason to see Journey to the Center of the Earth is to experience the 3-D. The film is being released in the format on about 1,500 screens, and it's definitely worth seeking out a theater that's equipped with the technology. After the brief setup the film is jam-packed with CGI, and the experience is much more effective when birds, yo-yos, flashlights and monsters are flying out of the screen. The format works perfectly for this type of film, which is more concerned with providing a thrill ride anything of substance.With visual effects whiz Eric Brevig making his feature directorial debut, it's no surprise that the CGI is impressive. Where the movie falters is with its story and characters, which are about two dimensions short of being in 3-D. The script devolves into a series of action set-pieces after the first twenty minutes, only stopping for brief moments thereafter to develop an afterthought of a romance and to deal with the mystery of Trevor's missing brother. Brevig keeps things moving a bit too quickly, and the result is a movie that has all the weight of cotton candy.While the film offers little to chew on, there's no denying that some of the adventurous antics on screen are tons of fun. A dangerous mine car ride straight out of Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom provides some excitement, as does a scene where Trevor and Sean try to out run a T-Rex. However, the best sequence in the movie involves Sean jumping across a series of floating magnetic rocks that are suspended in mid-air. Though similar to moments in hundreds of video games, the director manages to elicit giddy thrills with the high-flying stunts. With each of these set-pieces coming one after the other and numerous things jumping at you from the screen, it's impossible to get bored during the film's short running time.The performances are perfectly serviceable considering that the characters have no depth. Fraser has made a career out of mugging while fleeing CGI monstrosities, and he acquits himself well here. Hutcherson is a stand out as the slightly troubled, awestruck teen, and he makes sure his character never falls into the trap of being shrill and annoying. They make a believable team, though Anita Briem barely registers as the supposedly feisty Hannah. She's the one actor in the film who can't breathe additional life into her cardboard character.If you see Journey to the Center of the Earth in 3-D, it makes for an entertaining romp that will enthrall kids and won't leave adults feeling insulted. It may be a piece of completely forgettable fluff, but at least it provides some fleeting thrills before the end credits roll.3Characters wave tape measures at the screen for no reason other than to make an audience bob and weave. Goofy Brendan Fraser spits toothpaste in our general direction. Fanged fish leap into our virtual laps. When a yo-yo springs from Josh Hutcherson's hands, we jump in our seats.It's recommended you journey to a theater with 3-D capabilities if you're taking the family to see Journey. Though available everywhere in the standard, everyday, two-dimensional presentation (read: flat as a board and about as interesting), Journey makes excellent use of modern 3-D technology and actually harkens back to campy science-fiction of the 1950s.Geologist Trevor Anderson (Fraser) and his nephew Sean (Hutcherson) follow clues left in a tattered copy of Jules Verne's novel Journey to the Center of the Earth that they hope will lead them to Sean's missing father, Max (Jean Michael Pare). Their mission transports them to Iceland, where adorable mountain climber Hannah (Anita Briem) pilots them to a volcanic tube that carries them... well, you've read the title, so you get the idea.Journey makes about as much sense as a National Treasure film and moves as rapidly. For a film that gleefully apes Steven Spielberg -- with rampaging dinosaurs, hurtling mine cars, and a distracting father-son complex -- Journey actually equals this summer's Indiana Jones sequel on the assembly line of escalating dangers.The rattling calamity is obvious, sure, but surprisingly effective. On normal screens, though, Journey will lose its added visual dimension (pun intended), and subtract most of its fun.4Like any conscientious movie critic, I do what I can to avoid clichés, and since I am only human I don’t always succeed. But I have long vowed never to stoop to what I regard as the lowest kind of hackery, which is to describe a motion picture as a thrill ride, a heckofa ride or any other kind of ride. So what am I supposed to do about “Journey to the Center of the Earth,” a new movie that shares its name with a beloved Jules Verne novel, copies of which occasionally appear on screen? On their way to the titular destination, the three main characters — a geologist (Brendan Fraser), his young nephew (Josh Hutcherson) and an Icelandic mountain guide (Anita Briem) — speed down steeply inclined tracks in wheeled cars, rather like a roller coaster. A bit later, as they fly through the subterranean air, one of them predicts that they will descend into something “just like a water slide.” Near the end, after they have parasailed, fled from beasts and surfed on magnetic rocks, they whiz down a green hillside on a sled improvised from the jawbone of a dinosaur. If this movie is not a ride, then what is it?One thing it may not be, quite, is a movie. The 3-D technology, which you experience (in the theaters where it’s available) through spiffy gray-tinted glasses, does provide a few “Wow!,” “Eww!” and “Yikes!” moments, though the most impressive of them are also the least spectacular, as when Mr. Hutcherson swings a yo-yo or Mr. Fraser, after brushing his teeth, spits into the sink. Otherwise the effect messes with your ability to see clearly what is in the frame, so that the actors look like cutouts arranged in a snow globe. Not that they have much dimension to work with, since the script, by Michael Weiss, Jennifer Flackett and Mark Levin, is as functional as the direction, by Eric Brevig, is fussy. The geologist, whose brother vanished trying to prove his Vernean hypothesis, takes the brother’s adolescent son to Iceland, where they meet the mountain guide, whose father also vanished into the center of the Earth. A lot of scientifically preposterous, mildly diverting stuff happens down there, and then, just like that, the ride is over. 5For decades theme parks have made attractions out of 3D movies-- Universal's Terminator 3D, or MGM's Muppets 3D-- so it makes sense that the first big live-action 3D movie of the current 3D craze feels like a theme park attraction. The journey of Journey to the Center of the Earth 3D feels like a visit to Frontierland, with boat rides, mine carts, and one heck of a log flume. Experiencing it all in glorious 3D ups the ante-- it'll be a brave 8-year-old who never finds his palms sweating.Journey 3D is predictable, cheesy and not even a little edgy, but it's also as much fun as you're likely to have in a PG movie this summer. A retelling of Jules Verne's original story that takes the 19th-century novel as fact, the movie is a dream come true for anyone who's every imagined stepping through the wardrobe or riding the Hogwarts Express. If the lead characters are a little bland and unoriginal, it's all the better for us to put ourselves in their spelunking shoes.Brendan Fraser stars, however improbably, as geology professor Trevor. His brother Max disappeared years earlier while researching volcanic tubes, essentially express lanes to the center of the earth. Trevor has continued Max's research and is in danger of losing his department as a result, but during one fateful weekend visit from Max's son Sean (Josh Hutcherson), the numbers of his research align and inspire Trevor to embark again on Max's old expedition. Along the way Trevor and Sean meet up with an old scientist's daughter in Iceland (Anita Briem), and the three trek up a mountain to find one of Trevor's geologic sensors. But, of course, it's only a few wrong steps before the journey heads way, way down below.Over the course of the intra-terrestrial adventure, there's some uncle-nephew bonding and a rote romance. But it's all reasonably interspersed among thrilling scenes of action, the better ones including jumping, flesh-eating shark that attack a raft, a rickety mine cart\\\/roller coaster, and a T-Rex that, for whatever reason, lives happily in the earth's molten core. Each of the scenes make copious use of CGI, but with the 3D glasses and the highly unrealistic setting, it's not as egregious as it was in, say, the newest Indiana Jones.And the 3D is used for all kinds of fun gags, like a yo-yo flying at the audience's face, or fish snapping their teeth seemingly inches away. But it also effectively draws the audience into the story in a way a normal movie this predictable couldn't manage. Moments that might otherwise be groan-inducing become much-needed comfort or comic relief for an audience that's as close to part of the action as they can get.The chef flaw of Journey 3D is in how long it takes to get going, and how much time is dedicated to nonsense science explanations of phenomena the audience is perfectly willing to accept as is. But luckily the science talk is abandoned as soon as the trio begins its journey, and the characters spend most of their time shouting things like Watch out! and Find the geyser! You could accuse Journey of being crudely commercial, hitting all the audience-pleasing beats without too much creativity in the mix. But that would be denying the sheer pleasure of going through an experience with a predetermined ending-- like any given romantic comedy, or, say, a roller coaster. Strap on your 3D glasses, keep your hands and arms inside the seats, and enjoy the ride. 6Families looking for something to while away summer could do a lot worse than make this particular trip to the earth's core. It's the latest of many versions of Jules Verne's evergreen action yarn. Everyone from Pat Boone in 1959 to odd comic Emo Philips thirty years later have made the trip… but this one is the first live-action, narrative motion picture to be shot in digital 3D.What that basically means is that you get everything from a cockroach's feelers waving over an audience of squealing ankle biters to a foul-fanged piranha leaping over their ducking heads. It's great.Brendan Fraser - an actor seldom out of khaki - is the amiable college geophysicist who follows in the footsteps of his missing explorer brother…and finds himself tumbling down a volcanic tube in Iceland.Joining him hurtling towards the earth’s core are his cocky nephew Sean (Bridge To Terabithia’s Hutcherson) and nubile mountain guide Hannah (Briem).Miraculously landing safely with a big splash in a prehistoric pond, they find themselves in a surreal universe where mushrooms grow twenty feet tall, subterranean seas lap on sandy shores and dinosaurs are on the prowl despite having no apparent sources of food.But let’s not get too pedantic. Just enjoy it for what it is – a Saturday morning pictures yarn with a bigger budget and a fancy 3D camera borrowed from James “Titanic” Cameron.OK it’s a commercial template for a theme park ride…but it's also a thrillingly enjoyable action caper that makes joyous use of the clever-dick technology available to it.First-time director Eric Brevig, who cut his teeth as a special effects supremo on Total Recall and Pearl Harbor, knows his craft and keeps the action simple and effective.Highpoints include Sean gingerly hopping across a chasm on shifting stepping stones held in place by a magnetic force, a drooling T-Rex and the salty crossing of a ocean containing writhing serpents.What helps is the likeable cast. Fraser is an affable old hand at this sort of thing, Hutcherson is one of the few American teens you don’t want to slap and Briern acquits herself well in her first major role.It’s great, family fun. Go the journey.7A film that shares the same name with science fiction writer Jules Verne's book tries to share the same theme of his writing style. Verne wrote with inspiration as you actually thought what he wrote was real and NOT science fiction. And that's what great movies are about. We enter a world and we believe everything that is happening. So Journey to the Center of the Earth takes the name of the novel but doesn't take the books inspiration. For 90 minutes, I felt like I was on a amusement park ride that I wanted to get off 15 minutes in. I like riding roller coasters with the best of them, but I get sick of them after the fourth time around. Sometimes lineups are good and blessings in disguise. It gives you time to talk about the last ride and prepare for the new one. Journey doesn't offer that, which is too bad. I was given my 3D glasses and prepared myself for an interesting time. I know that this is really the future in film, especially in action films like these. But they are at their elementary steps in the process as they really don't seem to know yet what to do with 3D. Either it gets too busy or it's not busy enough. They haven't found that balance yet. Perhaps James Cameron's 3D Avator, coming out next summer will be the real start to movies to come. Journey to the Center of the Earth in 3D definitely isn't worth the extra price in admission. So please don't bother. This is a film filled with cliche after cliche. It's actually offensive in a way as you can only take so much. There isn't much for special effects wizard turned director Eric Brevig to work with, but even his direction is as basic as you can get. So it makes me wonder if they were paying too much attention on the 3D stuff than the actual direction and story. After all, Cameron has spent almost 3 years and going on Avator. The creative team of Journey of the Center of the Earth spent a faction of that time. It's a new way to make a film, which I'm all for as we need some flare to the film watch experience. But the bottom line always is an entertaining story where they take you into their world and you're glad to follow them. Having a good story is the key before anything else and it seemed that they forgot that. And I don't think we need to see anymore dinosaurs in movies anymore. 都是老美写的
