学术诚信,从你我做起 英语演讲稿
Ladies and gentlemen Good afternoon, today my topic is Academic integrity, starting with me。
Academic integrity is a fundamental value upon which colleges and universities are built. Students, faculty and staff are expected to contribute frank opinions, and other academic exercises that are vital to sustaining the discussion and exchange of ideas. For learning and scholarship to thrive, academic communities cannot tolerate acts of academic dishonesty, such as cheating, misrepresentation.there are four fundamental values that characterize an academic community of integrity: Honesty. The quest for truth and knowledge requires intellectual and personal honesty in learning, teaching, research and service. Trust. Academic institutions must foster a climate of mutual trust in order to stimulate the free exchange of ideas. Fairness. All interactions among students, faculty and administrators should be grounded in clear standards, practices and procedures. Respect. Learning is acknowledged as a participatory process, and a wide range of opinions and ideas is respected. As graduate students, academic integrity is particularly important in the future when We expected to service to others and our societies. So How do we maintain academic integrity? First, We make the effort to understand what counts as dishonesty and why this is wrong. Then, We work hard to master the rules of academic disciplines and achieve personal academic outcomes that we can be proud . Meanwhile, We appreciate the value of critical thinking and, a positive attitude, We take a problem-solving approach to learning, combining theory and practice in sophisticated ways At last, we should have the habit of developing new ideas and new ways of seeing, understanding, expressing, and communicating
英语演讲稿
英语演讲稿跟一般的是一样的．．演讲稿是一种实用性比较强的文体。
是为演讲准备的书面材料。
那么，什么是演讲呢
演讲是在公众面前就某一问题发表自己的见解的口头语言活动它的特点是：第一，它是在人与人之间进行的；第二，它有一定的时间性；第三，它是为了阐述某一问题或整理而开展的；第四，它带有一定的鼓动性和说服性。
像演讲比赛、典礼致辞、会议发言、学术讲座、科研报告、竞选演说、就职演说、法庭陈述等，都带有演讲的性质。
演讲稿是演讲用的文稿，也是演讲的依据。
它是为演讲服务的，是体现在书面上的讲话材料。
演讲有内容、目的的不同，演讲稿也具有不同的形态，有报导、有说明、有论辩、有答谢等。
总的来说，它的特征可以概括如下： 1、内容上的现实性 演讲稿是为了说明一定的观点和态度的。
这个观点和态度一定要与现实生活紧密相关。
它讨论的应该是现实生活中存在的并为人们所关心的问题。
它的观点要来自身边的生活或学习，材料也是如此。
它得是真实可信，是为了解决身边的问题而提出和讨论的。
2、情感上的说服性 演讲的目的和作用就在于打动听众，使听者对讲话者的观点或态度产生认可或同情。
演讲稿作为这种具有特定目的的讲话稿，一定要具有说服力和感染力。
很多著名的政治家都是很好的演讲者，他们往往借肋于自己出色的演讲，为自己的政治斗争铺路。
3、特定情景性 演讲稿是为演讲服务的，不同的演讲有不同的目的、情绪，有不同的场合和不同的听众，这些构成演讲的情景，演讲稿的写作要与这些特定情景相适应。
4、口语化 演讲稿的最终目的是用于讲话，所以，它是有声语言，是书面化的口语。
因此，演讲稿要“上口”、“入耳”，它一方面是把口头语言变为书面语言，即化声音为文字，起到规范文字、有助演讲的作用；另一方面，演讲稿要把较为正规严肃的书面语言转化为易听易明的口语，以便演讲。
同时，演讲稿的语言应适应演讲人的讲话习惯，同演讲者的自然讲话节奏一致。
演讲稿对于演讲都有哪些作用呢
主要体现在以下几方面：（1）整理演讲者的思路、提示演讲的内容、限定演讲的速度；（2）引导听众，使听众能更好地理解演讲的内容；（3）通过对语言的推究提高语言的表现力，增强语言的感染力。
由于演讲稿具有以上的特征和作用，它在写作方法上也有一定方法可循。
1、演讲稿的结构。
演讲稿的结构通常包括开场白、正文、结尾三部分。
开场白是演讲稿中很重要的部分。
好的开场白能够紧紧地抓住听众的注意力，为整场演讲的成功打下基础。
常用的开场白有点明主题、交代背景、提出问题等。
不论哪种开场白，目的都是使听众立即了解演讲主题、引入正文、引起思考等。
演讲稿的正文也是整篇演讲的主体。
主体必须有重点、有层次、有中心语句。
演讲主体的层次安排可按时间或空间顺序排列，也可以平行并列、正反对比、逐层深入。
由于演讲材料是通过口头表达的，为了便于听众理解，各段落应上下连贯，段与段之间有适当的过渡和照应。
结尾是演讲内容的收束。
它起着深化主题的作用。
结尾的方法有归纳法、引文法、反问法等。
归纳法是概括一篇演讲的中心思想，总结强调主要观点；引文法则是引用名言警句，升华主题、留下思考；反问法是以问句引发听众思考和对演讲者观点的认同。
此外，演讲稿的结尾也可以用感谢、展望、鼓舞等语句作结，使演讲能自然收束，给人留下深刻印象。
大多数演讲稿如同一篇议论文，有主要观点，有对主要观点的论证。
一篇演讲稿最好只有一个主题，这是由演讲稿的特定情景性和时间性所决定的。
在一个有限的时间段内，完全借助于语言、手势等向听众讲明一个问题或道理，同时又要说服听众，就要求在写作演讲稿时一定要突出主题、观点鲜明。
主题选定了，还要收集相应的材料对之进行论证。
材料的选择要通俗，要选择大多数人都知道的、听得懂的，而不能选择太生僻的、很少有人知道的。
因为演讲一即时表演，听众没有时间去验证或查找这些材料的内容或是出处。
因此，在准备演讲稿之前首先要了解听众的情况：他们是些什么人，他们的思想状况、文化程度、职业状况如何，他们所关心的问题是什么，等等。
掌握了听众的特征和心理，在此基础上恰当地选择材料，组织材料，是演讲成功的必要条件。
写作演讲稿还有一个特别要注意的，就是对演讲节奏和时间的把握。
每一场演讲都是有时间限制的，少则一分钟，多则一两小时甚至一天，演讲者必须把握自己演讲的速度和内容，既不能时间到了，还没有讲完，也不能距离演讲结束还有一段时间，而演讲者已经无话可说了。
演讲稿对于演讲速度和节奏的把握有着极其重要的作用。
写作时，要不时地停下来，用自己的正常语速大声朗读，根据朗读的结果调整演讲的内容。
另一方面，还要根据演讲时间的长短调整要讲的内容，做到整场演讲的音调有高低起伏、节奏有轻重缓急、情绪有高涨有低潮，波澜起伏、收舒有度。
最后，演讲稿还要在情绪上具有较强的感染力，语言上做到生动感人。
在没有时间限制的情况下，尽量做到短而精，在听众的精力分散前戛然而止，余味悠长。
高分求学术性的英文演讲题目，能讲10分钟的，只要题目，
哪方面的都不写清楚
说我熟悉的一个题目吧on the translation of names of characters in literary works.
求写一篇学术论文的英语演讲稿（8min）。
有偿。
演讲稿lecturelecture[简明英汉词典]n.演讲,讲稿,谴责,教训vt.演讲,训诫,说教vi.讲演
信仰的力量英文演讲稿
说实话我是COPY的.你看看能不能用把.A religion is a system of human thought which usually includes a set of narratives, symbols, beliefs and practices that give meaning to the practitioner's experiences of life through reference to a higher power, deity or deities, or ultimate truth.[1] Religion is commonly identified by the practitioner's prayer, ritual, meditation, music and art, among other things, and is often interwoven with society and politics. It may focus on specific supernatural, metaphysical, and moral claims about reality (the cosmos and human nature) which may yield a set of religious laws, ethics, and a particular lifestyle. Religion also encompasses ancestral or cultural traditions, writings, history, and mythology, as well as personal faith and religious experience.The term religion refers to both the personal practices related to communal faith and to group rituals and communication stemming from shared conviction. Religion is sometimes used interchangeably with faith or belief system,[2] but it is more socially defined than personal convictions, and it entails specific behaviors, respectively.In the frame of western religious thought,[3] religions present a common quality, the hallmark of patriarchal religious thought: the division of the world in two comprehensive domains, one sacred, the other profane.[4] According to the futurist Raymond Kurzweil, The primary role of traditional religion is deathist rationalization—that is, rationalizing the tragedy of death as a good thing.[5] Religion is often described as a communal system for the coherence of belief focusing on a system of thought, unseen being, person, or object, that is considered to be supernatural, sacred, divine, or of the highest truth. Moral codes, practices, values, institutions, tradition, rituals, and scriptures are often traditionally associated with the core belief, and these may have some overlap with concepts in secular philosophy. Religion is also often described as a way of life or a life stance Religion and the body politicA good understanding of the meaning of Christianity before the word religion came into common usage can be found in St. Augustine's writing. For Augustine, Christianity was a disciplina, a rule just like that of the Roman Empire. Christianity was therefore a power structure opposing and superseding human institutions, a literal Kingdom of Heaven. Rather than calling one to self-discipline through symbols, it was itself the discipline taught by one's family, school, church, and city authorities.[11] However at this point the root of the English word religion, the Latin religio, was in use only to mean reverence for God or the gods, careful pondering of divine things, piety (which Cicero further derived to mean diligence[12]); in other words, there was no sense of a system nor even of the Christian power structure but only of spirituality.[13] Max Müller characterized many other cultures around the world, including Egypt, Persia, and India, as having a similar power structure at this point in history. What we would call religion today, they would only call law.[14]As Christianity became commonplace, the charismatic authority identified by Augustine, a quality we might today call religiousness, had a commanding influence at the local level. This system persisted in the Byzantine Empire following the East-West Schism, while Western Europe regulated unpredictable expressions of charisma through the Roman Catholic Church. However, as the Church lost its dominance during the Protestant Reformation and Christianity became closely tied to political structures, religion was recast as the basis of national sovereignty, and religious identity gradually became a less universal sense of spirituality and more divisive, locally defined, and tied to nationality.[15] It was at this point that religion was dissociated with universal beliefs and moved closer to dogma in both meaning and practice. However there was not yet the idea of dogma as personal choice, only of established churches.Religious freedomIn the Age of Enlightenment, the idea of Christianity as the purest expression of spirituality was supplanted by the concept of religion as a worldwide practice.[16] This caused such ideas as religious freedom, a reexamination of classical philosophy as an alternative to Christian thought, and more radically Deism among intellectuals such as Voltaire. Much like Christianity, the idea of religious freedom was exported around the world as a civilizing technique, even to regions like India that had never treated spirituality as a matter of political identity.[17] In Japan, where Buddhism was still seen as a philosophy of natural law,[18] the concept of religion and religious freedom as separate from other power structures was unnecessary until Christian missionaries demanded free access to conversion, and when Japanese Christians refused to engage in patriotic events.[19]With the Enlightenment religion lost its attachment to nationality, but rather than being a universal social attitude, it was now a personal feeling, or emotion.[20] Friedrich Schleiermacher in the late 18th century defined religion as das schlechthinnige Abhängigkeitsgefühl, commonly translated as a feeling of absolute dependence.[21] His contemporary Hegel disagreed thoroughly, defining religion as the Divine Spirit becoming conscious of Himself through the finite spirit.[22] William James is an especially notable 19th century subscriber to the theory of religion as feeling.Confucianism, Taoism, and Buddhism are one, a painting in the litang style portraying three men laughing by a river stream, 12th century, Song DynastyModern currents in religionReligious studiesWith the recognition of religion as a category separate from culture and society came the rise of religious studies. Clifford Geertz's definition of religion as a cultural system was dominant for most of the 20th century and continues to be widely accepted today.Sociologists and anthropologists tend to see religion as an abstract set of ideas, values, or experiences developed as part of a cultural matrix. For example, in Lindbeck's Nature of Doctrine, religion does not refer to belief in God or a transcendent Absolute. Instead, Lindbeck defines religion as, a kind of cultural and\\\/or linguistic framework or medium that shapes the entirety of life and thought… it is similar to an idiom that makes possible the description of realities, the formulation of beliefs, and the experiencing of inner attitudes, feelings, and sentiments.”[23] According to this definition, religion refers to one's primary worldview and how this dictates one's thoughts and actions. Thus religion is considered by some sources to extend to causes, principles, or activities believed in with zeal or conscientious devotion concerning points or matters of ethics or conscience, and not necessarily including belief in the supernatural.[24]Although evolutionists had previously sought to understand and explain religion in terms of a cultural attribute which might conceivably confer biological advantages to its adherents, Richard Dawkins called for a re-analysis of religion in terms of the evolution of self-replicating ideas apart from any resulting biological advantages they might bestow. He argued that the role of key replicator in cultural evolution belongs not to genes, but to memes replicating thought from person to person by means of imitation. These replicators respond to selective pressures that may or may not affect biological reproduction or survival.[25] Susan Blackmore regards religions as particularly tenacious memes.[26] Chris Hedges, however, regards meme theory as a misleading imposition of genetics onto psychology.Interfaith cooperationBecause religion continues to be recognized in Western thought as a universal impulse, many religious practitioners have aimed to band together in interfaith dialogue and cooperation. The first major dialogue was the Parliament of the World's Religions at the 1893 Chicago World's Fair, which remains notable even today both in affirming universal values and recognition of the diversity of practices among different cultures. The 20th century has been especially fruitful in use of interfaith dialogue as a means of solving ethnic, political, or even religious conflict, with Christian-Jewish reconciliation representing a complete reverse in the attitudes of many Christian communities towards Jews.Secularism and criticism of religionMain articles: Criticism of religion, Antireligion, Secularism, Agnosticism, and AtheismAs religion became a more personal matter, discussions of society found a new focus on political and scientific meaning, and religious attitudes were increasingly seen as irrelevant for the needs of the European world. On the political side, Ludwig Feuerbach recast Christian beliefs in light of humanism, paving the way for Karl Marx's famous characterization of religion as the opiate of the masses. Meanwhile, in the scientific community, T.H. Huxley in 1869 coined the term agnostic, a term subsequently adopted by such figures as Robert Ingersoll. Later, Bertrand Russell told the world Why I Am Not a Christian.Atheists have developed a critique of religious systems as well as personal faith. Modern-day critics focus on religion's lack of utility in human society, faulting religion as being irrational.[27] Some assert that dogmatic religions are in effect morally deficient, elevating to moral status ancient, arbitrary, and ill-informed rules—taboos on eating pork, for example, as well as dress codes and sexual practices[28]—possibly designed for reasons of hygiene or even mere politics in a bygone era.In North America and Western Europe the social fallout of the 9\\\/11 attacks contributed in part to the appearance of numerous pro-secularist books, such as The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins, The End of Faith by Sam Harris, and God is not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything by Christopher Hitchens. This criticism is largely, but not entirely, focused on the monotheistic Abrahamic traditions.Religious beliefCentral Asian (Tocharian) and East-Asian Buddhist monks, Bezeklik, Eastern Tarim Basin, 9th-10th centuryMain article: Religious beliefReligious belief usually relates to the existence, nature and worship of a deity or deities and divine involvement in the universe and human life. Alternately, it may also relate to values and practices transmitted by a spiritual leader. Unlike other belief systems, which may be passed on orally, religious belief tends to be codified in literate societies (religion in non-literate societies is still largely passed on orally[29]). In some religions, like the Abrahamic religions, it is held that most of the core beliefs have been divinely revealed.Religious belief can also involve causes, principles or activities believed in with zeal or conscientious devotion concerning points or matters of ethics or conscience, not necessarily limited to organized religions
求高人帮我写份英文演讲稿
你好， lovsp。
这是一篇经过摘取加工的文章，先从学术上关于医德的定义和现代医生与病患的关系入手，指出医德核心内容，最后积极向上表示尽心尽责树立医德，为病患服务。
希望能帮得上你的忙。
Six of the values that commonly apply to medical ethics discussions are:Autonomy - the patient has the right to refuse or choose their treatment. (Voluntas aegroti suprema lex.) Beneficence - a practitioner should act in the best interest of the patient. (Salus aegroti suprema lex.) Non-maleficence - first, do no harm (primum non nocere). Justice - concerns the distribution of scarce health resources, and the decision of who gets what treatment (fairness and equality). Dignity - the patient (and the person treating the patient) have the right to dignity. Truthfulness and honesty - the concept of informed consent has increased in importance since the historical events of the Doctors' Trial of the Nuremberg trials and Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Confidentiality is commonly applied to conversations between doctors and patients. This concept is commonly known as patient-physician privilege.Traditionally, medical ethics has viewed the duty of confidentiality as a relatively non-negotiable tenet of medical practice. More recently, critics like Jacob Appel have argued for a more nuanced approach to the duty that acknowledges the need for flexibility in many cases.Traditional medical oaths and codes prescribe a physician's character, motives, and duties. Typically they portray ideal physicians as devoted to the welfare of patients and to advancement of the medical profession and medical knowledge, responding compassionately to the suffering of patients, humbly mindful of the limits of their curative powers and the harms they may unintentionally cause. The Hippocratic injunction Strive to help, but above all, do no harm is the ruling maxim. In current discussion, this maxim has been codified in oft-cited principles of nonmaleficence and beneficence.Missunderstandings still exists though we'd still adhere to our medical ethics and responsiable for our patients.
