求视频:2005金酸梅奖，哈利贝瑞到场领奖并发表获奖感言
《年轻狂热1981 《亲爱的妈咪》1982 《仁川》1983 《THE LONELY LADY》1984 《第一滴血》1985 《第一滴血续集》1986 《神兵》与《UNDER THE CHERRY MOON》1987 《天才老爹拯救地球》1988 《鸡尾酒》1989 《终极先锋》1990 《ADVENTURES OF FORD FAIRLANE》与《GHOSTS CAN'T DO IT》1991 《终极神鹰》1992 《爱在战火蔓延时》1993 《桃色交易》1994 《夜色》1995 《美国舞娘》1996 《脱衣舞娘》1997 《2013终极神差》1998 《双龙一虎闯天关》1999 《飙风战警》2000 《地球战场》2001 《魔鬼老哥》2002 《踩过界》2003 《吉格力》2004 《猫女》2005 《肮脏的爱》2006 《本能2》2007 《双面疑杀》2008 《爱情大师》2009
求约翰·斯坦贝克的诺贝尔文学奖获奖感言，演讲稿译文。
在线等
Banquet SpeechJohn Steinbeck's speech at the Nobel Banquet at the City Hall in Stockholm, December 10, 1962I thank the Swedish Academy for finding my work worthy of this highest honor.In my heart there may be doubt that I deserve the Nobel award over other men of letters whom I hold in respect and reverence - but there is no question of my pleasure and pride in having it for myself.It is customary for the recipient of this award to offer personal or scholarly comment on the nature and the direction of literature. At this particular time, however, I think it would be well to consider the high duties and the responsibilities of the makers of literature.Such is the prestige of the Nobel award and of this place where I stand that I am impelled, not to squeak like a grateful and apologetic mouse, but to roar like a lion out of pride in my profession and in the great and good men who have practiced it through the ages.Literature was not promulgated by a pale and emasculated critical priesthood singing their litanies in empty churches - nor is it a game for the cloistered elect, the tinhorn mendicants of low calorie despair.Literature is as old as speech. It grew out of human need for it, and it has not changed except to become more needed.The skalds, the bards, the writers are not separate and exclusive. From the beginning, their functions, their duties, their responsibilities have been decreed by our species.Humanity has been passing through a gray and desolate time of confusion. My great predecessor, William Faulkner, speaking here, referred to it as a tragedy of universal fear so long sustained that there were no longer problems of the spirit, so that only the human heart in conflict with itself seemed worth writing about.Faulkner, more than most men, was aware of human strength as well as of human weakness. He knew that the understanding and the resolution of fear are a large part of the writer's reason for being.This is not new. The ancient commission of the writer has not changed. He is charged with exposing our many grievous faults and failures, with dredging up to the light our dark and dangerous dreams for the purpose of improvement.Furthermore, the writer is delegated to declare and to celebrate man's proven capacity for greatness of heart and spirit - for gallantry in defeat - for courage, compassion and love. In the endless war against weakness and despair, these are the bright rally-flags of hope and of emulation.I hold that a writer who does not passionately believe in the perfectibility of man, has no dedication nor any membership in literature.The present universal fear has been the result of a forward surge in our knowledge and manipulation of certain dangerous factors in the physical world.It is true that other phases of understanding have not yet caught up with this great step, but there is no reason to presume that they cannot or will not draw abreast. Indeed it is a part of the writer's responsibility to make sure that they do.With humanity's long proud history of standing firm against natural enemies, sometimes in the face of almost certain defeat and extinction, we would be cowardly and stupid to leave the field on the eve of our greatest potential victory.Understandably, I have been reading the life of Alfred Nobel - a solitary man, the books say, a thoughtful man. He perfected the release of explosive forces, capable of creative good or of destructive evil, but lacking choice, ungoverned by conscience or judgment.Nobel saw some of the cruel and bloody misuses of his inventions. He may even have foreseen the end result of his probing - access to ultimate violence - to final destruction. Some say that he became cynical, but I do not believe this. I think he strove to invent a control, a safety valve. I think he found it finally only in the human mind and the human spirit. To me, his thinking is clearly indicated in the categories of these awards.They are offered for increased and continuing knowledge of man and of his world - for understanding and communication, which are the functions of literature. And they are offered for demonstrations of the capacity for peace - the culmination of all the others.Less than fifty years after his death, the door of nature was unlocked and we were offered the dreadful burden of choice.We have usurped many of the powers we once ascribed to God.Fearful and unprepared, we have assumed lordship over the life or death of the whole world - of all living things.The danger and the glory and the choice rest finally in man. The test of his perfectibility is at hand.Having taken Godlike power, we must seek in ourselves for the responsibility and the wisdom we once prayed some deity might have.Man himself has become our greatest hazard and our only hope.So that today, St. John the apostle may well be paraphrased: In the end is the Word, and the Word is Man - and the Word is with Men.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Prior to the speech, R. Sandler, Member of the Royal Academy of Sciences, commented, «Mr. John Steinbeck - In your writings, crowned with popular success in many countries, you have been a bold observer of human behaviour in both tragic and comic situations. This you have described to the reading public of the entire world with vigour and realism. Your Travels with Charley is not only a search for but also a revelation of America, as you yourself say: ‹This monster of a land, this mightiest of nations, this spawn of the future turns out to be the macrocosm of microcosm me.› Thanks to your instinct for what is genuinely American you stand out as a true representative of American life.»
金扫帚奖近日公布，有哪些亲自上台领奖的明星
一、案例分析公共关系与庸俗关系的 二、通过案例分析什么是真正的公共关系FAA是美国联邦航空局的简称。
上海飞机制造厂和美国麦道公司联合生产MD—82飞机，很快就领教了FAA检查官员的厉害。
FAA在国际航空界颇有威望。
它们颁发的生产许可证，是飞机厂家的金字招牌。
上海飞机制造厂生产麦道飞机，首先要通过FAA检验关。
第一次接受检查，上海飞机制造厂按照迎接国内检查评比团的经验，安排了一整套的接待。
高级宾馆、丰盛的宴席…….可是，这一套全是白费功夫。
FAA的官员们一不要厂家接送；二不住厂家预订的宾馆；三不听厂领导事先准备好的汇报。
一切都是自己摸、自已看。
休息时，吃一片面包，喝一杯咖啡，都是照价付现金。
现场检查，铁面无私。
而且严得令人心跳。
他们发现厂里一名检验员印章的颜色不对，便提出对100多名掌用印章的检验员全部进行一次视力检查，果然查出两名色盲。
第一次检查当然没有通过。
厂方领教了FAA检查的严厉，真正在管理和生产质量上做了扎扎实实的努力。
经过这样一丝不苟的4次检查之后，上海飞机制造厂才获得了FAA颁发的生产许可证。
事情并未到此结束，获得生产许可证之后。
检查变成了更加严格的日常监管。
FAA派代表常驻上海，一切费用照例自理。
各种跟踪检查常常不期而至。
所有的结果都按月传送到FAA总部。
总部又定期派检查组进行全面复查，而每次派来的检查人员都是厂方从未见过的陌生面孔。
1．两者产生的基础不同。
公共关商品经济高度发达、现代民主制度不断发展、信息手段十分先进的产物（详见第二章）；庸俗关系则是在封闭落后的经济条件下，生产力不发达、市场经济发育不完善、物质供应不充足的产物，带有浓厚的血缘、地缘的色彩。
2．两者的理论依据不同。
公共关系以现代科学理论为指导，按照正确的目标、科学的方式、规范的组织形式、严格的工作程序和道德准则来进行；庸俗关系则建立在市侩经验的基础上，其方法是险恶的权术，奉行的是“人不为己，天诛地灭”的信条。
3．两者的活动方式不同。
公共关系是社会组织与社会公众之间的正当联系，主要是通过正式渠道，采取大众传播或人际传播等手段，公开地进行活动，其活动是正大光明的。
而庸俗关系是个人与个人之间的不正当联系，是私人之间相互利用的一种不正当的活动。
其参与者尽量掩盖其所作所为，进行幕后交易，如通过奉承拍马、内外勾结、营私舞弊、行贿受贿等庸俗手段，进行暗中拉关系、谋私利的活动。
这些活动不能在公众场合下公开进行，只能在暗地里偷偷地进行。
4．两者所要达到的目的不同。
公共关系以建立良好的组织形象、提高知名度与美誉度、维护组织与公众双方的合理利益为目标，恪守公正诚实、信誉至上的原则，从而使组织获取较好的社会效益与经济效益；庸俗关系则是通过各种卑劣手段，来达到个人私利的目的，如搞些紧俏商品，买些便宜货，谋个好职务，在竞标中搞到竞标项目等等。
前者为公共利益而奋斗，后者只是为个人的私利而投机钻营。
5．两者产生的效果不同。
公共关系是通过有计划的一系列活动，使社会组织在与社会整体利益一致的前提下不断发展，其结果是组织、社会、国家和公众都受惠，为社会创造一种以诚相见、讲求信誉、提高声望的良好风气；有利于形成和谐、友善、正常、健康的人际关系；有利于提高社会文明程度，促进社会的发展。
庸俗关系则是将人际交往商品化，使人们变得唯利是图、目光短浅，整个社会充满市侩气，个人中饱私囊，而国家和公众的利益却遭到损害。
是否可以解决您的问题
亲自摘果的心情
会有一种满满的成就感，自食其力摘的果子也是尤其的清甜，对于在城市生活的人很难得有这种体验，那种劳动过后的满足感，让人身心愉悦。
酸梅汤促销手段 大家在喝酸梅汤时有什么感想
什么情况下喝呢
炎热的夏天，一杯冰镇杨梅汤，那是又解渴又消暑。
