
律政俏佳人英文观后感 篇1
I love this everything about this movie including its storyline, actors, actresses and so on. I think this movie is very sweet. Why do I think so? There are some reasons.
First of all, Reese Witherspoon who is acting the heroine "Elle Woods" is very cute, not only cute but also her fashions are so charming. Secondly, I like Elles character. She is always positive with everything, even if she faces serious or difficult situations. My favorite scene is that where Law School students including Elle, Elles old boyfriend, Warner and his girlfriend Vivian are taking a class. As Elles opinion is praised by professor, and her opinion is better than Warners, Warner and Vivian look each other with chagrined face. When I saw the scene, I felt refreshed, and I wanted to say to Elle that "You did it, Elle!"
I really like this movie! The storyline, all of fashions are cute, and actors as well as actresses are suitable for their characters. This movie is not only sweet, charming and delightful, but also Elle Woods told us that a lot of important things for humans beings. In particular I want many ladies to see this movie, but I recommend this movie to to everyone including young boys!
律政俏佳人英文观后感 篇2
A high concept can be a wonderful thing. Up to a point. It can get your film sold and maybe even make it look attractive, but it cant ensure much of anything else. Case in point, may it please the court, is "Legally Blonde."
Starring Reese Witherspoon as a Bel-Air airhead wending her way through law school, "Legally Blonde" is basically "Clueless Goes to Harvard." Nothing wrong with that notion, but, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, Ive seen "Clueless" and this is no "Clueless."
Thats more disappointing than it may sound, because "Legally Blonde" is guilty of squandering resources. Amusing as it goes about setting up its premise, in Witherspoon, the gifted veteran of "Election" and "Pleasantville," it has an actress willing to throw herself completely into the part to excellent effect. But while "Clueless" had the use of the road-tested plot of Jane Austens "Emma," "Legally Blonde" does not. Haphazardly directed by first-timer Robert Luketic and written by Karen McCullah Lutz & Kirsten Smith (who did the similarly bright but dramatically unfocused "10 Things I Hate About You"), this film cant figure out where to go with its concept and increasingly unravels as it marches along.
Witherspoon plays Elle Woods, the way blond president of the Delta Nu sorority at a mythical Southern California university. Though were clued in early that shes way smarter than her runner-up for Miss Hawaiian Tropic lifestyle might indicate, Elles ambitions are limited to getting married to the man of her dreams.
That would be Warner Huntington III (Matthew Davis), smug as only a III can be. On the night Elle expects Warner to propose, he takes the opportunity to break up with her. Hes going to Harvard Law with the aim of being a senator by the time hes 30, a schedule that mandates that he "marry a Jackie, not a Marilyn."
Miffed, Elle decides to go to Harvard Law as well. So what if her strong GPA comes from taking courses like "The History of Polka Dots" as a fashion merchandising major. So what if her father feels law school is exclusively for people who are "boring, ugly and serious." Harvard Law is what its going to be.
Elles determination is at the heart of her irrepressible character. Faultlessly played by Witherspoon, Elle is all bounce all the time, so filled with positive energy that the actress reported that it was actually tiring to play the part. Elles bikini-clad video application so flummoxes the Harvard admission committee that it lets her in in the name of, what else, diversity.
She arrives with her scented, pink resume and her tiny Chihuahua Bruiser, determined to take notes not on a computer but a cozy heart-shaped pad. No one is amused. Not her ex Warner, not his snooty new fiancee Vivian Kensington (Selma Blair), not fierce professor Stromwell (Holland Taylor). Only the quietly handsome Emmett Richmond (Luke Wilson) can look past the light streaming off her hair and sees Elle for what she is.
All this is passably amusing, but once the film establishes Elle at Harvard, it seems at a loss as far as building on its eminently serviceable premise. It sets off in two directions, but neither one offers much in the way of satisfaction.
"Legally Blonde" first gives Elle a confidant in the form of a confidence-challenged manicurist named Paulette played by Jennifer Coolidge. Though Groundlings veteran Coolidge is invariably amusing ("Best in Show," a key cameo in "American Pie"), Paulette is too phlegmatic for even her talents to energize.
More misguided is the subplot concerning a murder case that Elle, as an intern for the defense team headed by one of her professors (Victor Garber), gets involved with. Though comedy legal proceedings neednt be as carefully plotted as Perry Mason, this one is so cockamamie that you can feel the interest leak out of the situation like air out of a balloon. Its unfortunate that a film premised on the notion that first impressions are not always reliable finds itself teaching that very lesson itself.
All this is passably amusing, but once the film establishes Elle at Harvard, it seems at a loss as far as building on its eminently serviceable premise. It sets off in two directions, but neither one offers much in the way of satisfaction.
"Legally Blonde" first gives Elle a confidant in the form of a confidence-challenged manicurist named Paulette played by Jennifer Coolidge. Though Groundlings veteran Coolidge is invariably amusing ("Best in Show," a key cameo in "American Pie"), Paulette is too phlegmatic for even her talents to energize.
More misguided is the subplot concerning a murder case that Elle, as an intern for the defense team headed by one of her professors (Victor Garber), gets involved with. Though comedy legal proceedings needn't be as carefully plotted as Perry Mason, this one is so cockamamie that you can feel the interest leak out of the situation like air out of a balloon. It's unfortunate that a film premised on the notion that first impressions are not always reliable finds itself teaching that very lesson itself.更多经典英文观后感推荐阅读:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
《律政俏佳人1》观后感(一)
今天看了电影律政俏佳人第一部,一开始还以为是讲述一个有关与职业女性成长的故事,看了以后才明白其实是讲述一个和我们一样的女孩为了自我的梦想不断付出努力最后成功完整自我的故事。算不上是什么奋斗史,因为只是一个女孩在长大过程中的小梦想小纠结小奋斗而已。他真实的让人觉得那个女主角似乎是我们自我,因为他和此刻热情而张扬的我们是如此的相似,我们都是这么的不顾一切向前冲的女孩。唯一的不一样是我们想过了却没有实施,但是他实施了而且成功了,他就是我们的梦,在电影里完全的成为了真实。
而我在看完电影以后脑袋里就冒出了一句话:一个女孩能够因为感情选取一个错误的开始,但是请不要让它成为一个错误的结束。
其实并不是单指感情,而是很多事情。我们是有权选取我们的未来,更加爱有权对我们的未来负职责。
也许是一个带有太多幻想和美国色彩的故事,我们并不可能像艾尔一样那么幸运,仿佛冥冥之中有神在帮忙一样。我们也许是普通的,但是我们又是不普通的,我们能够有激情又梦想我们能够有期望有行动。我们是和艾尔一样爱大声尖叫蹦蹦跳跳的快快乐乐的沉浸在幻想当中的傻女孩。但是我们的傻一样让我们显得这样珍贵,在这个对未来失去激情期望的年代,在这个我们都假装成熟的年代,我们能够用自我的努力我们的激情来做自我,也许我们不能影响到身边的人,也许我们甚至到最后无法实现自我的梦想,但是努力过,我们就没有什么后悔的了。
所以呢?当我们开始行动起来的时候我们开始为我们自我叫好,管别人是怎样想的,管别人是什么心理,管别人是用什么方式,用自我的心用自我的手,用自我的一切,做自我的自我。
带着自我最好的朋友,去实现那些我们的梦想。我们的白日梦。
《律政俏佳人1》观后感(二)
最近稍微偷一下懒,找了一部电影来看,找到了律政俏佳人的第一部,在观看后感想良多啊。
在电影中,艾丽是律政俏佳人中的女主角。美丽,时尚的她却被追求事业的男朋友抛弃了。为此,她决定考进哈佛法学院去追回男朋友。
艾莉凭借自我的努力考取了哈佛法学院。但是保守、甚至迂腐且以男性目光建构的法学院是不会理解这样的一个女生的。在法律课堂上,教师总是会找茬来质问她是否课前预习了功课。法学院的老师和学生都对她有偏见,看不起她。如果她表现出色,他们甚至会感到惊讶。
艾丽在分手后不断地从自我身上找原因,将赢得感情与婚姻作为自我进入律政行业的动力。艾丽看似是在主动追求自我的感情,实际上却只是为了让男友注意到自我,她一向受着男性思维的`禁锢。此外,影片中女性之间的竞争和比较也是围绕着男性的,女性的成功与否是以是否获得男性欢心来衡量的。艾丽的情敌维维安常在艾丽面前故意炫耀自我手上的钻戒,或者对沃纳示好。当被艾丽狠损了之后,维维安伸手看着手上的钻戒,其女友也对她说,“至少你得到了戒指”。从中能够看出,感情的允诺与婚姻的保证还是女性最看重的,电影塑造的女性都要受限于“被爱”、“家庭”等传统女性主角定义。
这部电影虽说是彰显女性在法律界的地位,但仍存在着种种不平等。首先,电影大部分资料体现了感情、婚姻和家庭是女性的第一要务,影片的女主角按照男性社会的价值观念调整自我的生活。塑造的女性形象表现了传统女性具有的“女性特质”,是被动的、顺从的、被观赏的、感性的、被情感支配的,她们的领域被限制在依靠于男性的社会范围中。其次,胜诉的背后也是因为她发挥了自我的女性特长,对同性恋的洞察力,以及关于烫发的美容常识;在很大程度上,她是凭借女性的感性思维和直觉才“意外”取胜的。因此,影片实际并没有真正认可女性与男性在理性思维潜力方面的平等,实际上体现了对女性的偏见。
但是即使电影中没有表现出真正的男女平等,我相信那一天总会实现的。



