关于青春和信仰的演讲稿
每个人的一生都有必须做地三件事：吃喝，睡觉，上厕所。
作为一个人这都是必需的，但如果是一直只有这些事，只会使我们变成行尸走肉。
人吗，应当有追求，更应该有原则，换句话说，一个人需要理想和信仰。
在中华五千年的历史中，没有哪一个团体比我们的党的理想更远大，没有哪一个组织的成员比我们的党员信仰更坚定，所以没有哪一个团队比中国共产党更成功。
党章中就有我们的党信仰的文字化描述：中国共产党是工人阶级的先锋队，是中国各族人民利益的忠实代表，是中国社会主义事业的领导核心；对理想的描述是实现共同富裕，也就是国家富强。
有了这种理想与信仰中国共产党才能由弱变强，进而主宰中国现代的历史。
转而说个人，也是这个道理。
信仰与理想的作用也是不可估量的，它们是人生之舟的帆和舵.有了它们,一个人才能称之为人,一个人才能让有限的生命迸发出无限的能量,为世界增添一点亮色.世界上有很多这样的例子,像领导各国人民摆脱民族压迫的的领袖们,像让黑人获得权利的马丁.路德.金,以及在各个领域都有卓越建树的成功人士,毫无例外的,他们都有坚定的信仰与远大的理想,所以作为未来承担历史任务的主体大学生我们更应该拥有远大的理想和找到坚定的信仰世界上没有完全一样的两个人,但理想是可以共有的,信仰也是可以分享的.如果我们中的某些人志同道合,那是再还不过了,因为那不是简单的代数相加而是可能会发生质的变化,将不可能化为可能.关于怎样树立理想与找到坚定的信仰,作为社会主义接班人的我们的个人理想无疑要服从国家理想,我们的信仰也要服从马列主义.在不于国家理想矛盾的情况下,树立自己的的理想;根据马列主义找到自己的信仰.只有这样我们才不会被历史潮流淹没,成为祖国的罪人.具体细节方面因人而异,但大的方向不能错.
求一篇信仰点亮青春的演讲稿，帮帮忙吧
关于信仰的演讲稿范文每个人的一生都有必须做地三件事：吃喝，睡觉，上厕所。
作为一个人这都是必需的，但如果是一直只有这些事，只会使我们变成行尸走肉。
人吗，应当有追求，更应该有原则，换句话说，一个人需要理想和信仰。
在中华五千年的历史中，没有哪一个团体比我们的党的理想更远大，没有哪一个组织的成员比我们的党员信仰更坚定，所以没有哪一个团队比中国共产党更成功。
党章中就有我们的党信仰的文字化描述：中国共产党是工人阶级的先锋队，是中国各族人民利益的忠实代表，是中国社会主义事业的领导核心；对理想的描述是实现共同富裕，也就是国家富强。
有了这种理想与信仰中国共产党才能由弱变强，进而主宰中国现代的历史。
转而说个人，也是这个道理。
信仰与理想的作用也是不可估量的，它们是人生之舟的帆和舵.有了它们,一个人才能称之为人,一个人才能让有限的生命迸发出无限的能量,为世界增添一点亮色.世界上有很多这样的例子,像领导各国人民摆脱民族压迫的的领袖们,像让黑人获得权利的马丁.路德.金,以及在各个领域都有卓越建树的成功人士,毫无例外的,他们都有坚定的信仰与远大的理想,所以作为未来承担历史任务的主体大学生我们更应该拥有远大的理想和找到坚定的信仰世界上没有完全一样的两个人,但理想是可以共有的,信仰也是可以分享的.如果我们中的某些人志同道合,那是再还不过了,因为那不是简单的代数相加而是可能会发生质的变化,将不可能化为可能.关于怎样树立理想与找到坚定的信仰,作为社会主义接班人的我们的个人理想无疑要服从国家理想,我们的信仰也要服从马列主义.在不于国家理想矛盾的情况下,树立自己的的理想;根据马列主义找到自己的信仰.只有这样我们才不会被历史潮流淹没,成为祖国的罪人.具体细节方面因人而异,但大的方向不能错.
信仰的力量600字演讲稿
信仰是一个人的精神内核，是支撑人坚定走下去的动力源泉。
一个有信仰的人是一个有追求的人，时刻哟种无形的力量支撑着他往前走，即使身体离岗，精神永不离岗。
张海迪阿姨就是一个最好的例子。
5岁时，因病半身瘫痪，不能上学，但是对生命的渴望，对生活的热爱，使她在困难面前永不服输。
终于经历种种磨难，自学完成了多种语言，并创作出版了许多书籍，成了国内外有名的残疾人作家。
我们的革命战士，为了新中国的成立抛头颅洒热血，面对敌人的威逼利诱，面对敌人的严刑拷打，面对死亡，义无返顾，勇往直前，这就是因为他们心中有自己的信仰，有自己认为可以用生命去为之奋斗的东西，这就是信仰的力量。
人的胜利，不见得属于强者，但或迟或早，那相信自己能成功的人必能成功。
有了信仰，前方的路就不会再迷茫;有了信仰，前进的路中就不会再孤单;有了信仰，就有了翅膀，坚定得向着未来飞翔……
急求~信仰的力量演讲稿
说实话我是COPY的.你看看能不能用把.A religion is a system of human thought which usually includes a set of narratives, symbols, beliefs and practices that give meaning to the practitioner's experiences of life through reference to a higher power, deity or deities, or ultimate truth.[1] Religion is commonly identified by the practitioner's prayer, ritual, meditation, music and art, among other things, and is often interwoven with society and politics. It may focus on specific supernatural, metaphysical, and moral claims about reality (the cosmos and human nature) which may yield a set of religious laws, ethics, and a particular lifestyle. Religion also encompasses ancestral or cultural traditions, writings, history, and mythology, as well as personal faith and religious experience.The term religion refers to both the personal practices related to communal faith and to group rituals and communication stemming from shared conviction. Religion is sometimes used interchangeably with faith or belief system,[2] but it is more socially defined than personal convictions, and it entails specific behaviors, respectively.In the frame of western religious thought,[3] religions present a common quality, the hallmark of patriarchal religious thought: the division of the world in two comprehensive domains, one sacred, the other profane.[4] According to the futurist Raymond Kurzweil, The primary role of traditional religion is deathist rationalization—that is, rationalizing the tragedy of death as a good thing.[5] Religion is often described as a communal system for the coherence of belief focusing on a system of thought, unseen being, person, or object, that is considered to be supernatural, sacred, divine, or of the highest truth. Moral codes, practices, values, institutions, tradition, rituals, and scriptures are often traditionally associated with the core belief, and these may have some overlap with concepts in secular philosophy. Religion is also often described as a way of life or a life stance Religion and the body politicA good understanding of the meaning of Christianity before the word religion came into common usage can be found in St. Augustine's writing. For Augustine, Christianity was a disciplina, a rule just like that of the Roman Empire. Christianity was therefore a power structure opposing and superseding human institutions, a literal Kingdom of Heaven. Rather than calling one to self-discipline through symbols, it was itself the discipline taught by one's family, school, church, and city authorities.[11] However at this point the root of the English word religion, the Latin religio, was in use only to mean reverence for God or the gods, careful pondering of divine things, piety (which Cicero further derived to mean diligence[12]); in other words, there was no sense of a system nor even of the Christian power structure but only of spirituality.[13] Max Müller characterized many other cultures around the world, including Egypt, Persia, and India, as having a similar power structure at this point in history. What we would call religion today, they would only call law.[14]As Christianity became commonplace, the charismatic authority identified by Augustine, a quality we might today call religiousness, had a commanding influence at the local level. This system persisted in the Byzantine Empire following the East-West Schism, while Western Europe regulated unpredictable expressions of charisma through the Roman Catholic Church. However, as the Church lost its dominance during the Protestant Reformation and Christianity became closely tied to political structures, religion was recast as the basis of national sovereignty, and religious identity gradually became a less universal sense of spirituality and more divisive, locally defined, and tied to nationality.[15] It was at this point that religion was dissociated with universal beliefs and moved closer to dogma in both meaning and practice. However there was not yet the idea of dogma as personal choice, only of established churches.Religious freedomIn the Age of Enlightenment, the idea of Christianity as the purest expression of spirituality was supplanted by the concept of religion as a worldwide practice.[16] This caused such ideas as religious freedom, a reexamination of classical philosophy as an alternative to Christian thought, and more radically Deism among intellectuals such as Voltaire. Much like Christianity, the idea of religious freedom was exported around the world as a civilizing technique, even to regions like India that had never treated spirituality as a matter of political identity.[17] In Japan, where Buddhism was still seen as a philosophy of natural law,[18] the concept of religion and religious freedom as separate from other power structures was unnecessary until Christian missionaries demanded free access to conversion, and when Japanese Christians refused to engage in patriotic events.[19]With the Enlightenment religion lost its attachment to nationality, but rather than being a universal social attitude, it was now a personal feeling, or emotion.[20] Friedrich Schleiermacher in the late 18th century defined religion as das schlechthinnige Abhängigkeitsgefühl, commonly translated as a feeling of absolute dependence.[21] His contemporary Hegel disagreed thoroughly, defining religion as the Divine Spirit becoming conscious of Himself through the finite spirit.[22] William James is an especially notable 19th century subscriber to the theory of religion as feeling.Confucianism, Taoism, and Buddhism are one, a painting in the litang style portraying three men laughing by a river stream, 12th century, Song DynastyModern currents in religionReligious studiesWith the recognition of religion as a category separate from culture and society came the rise of religious studies. Clifford Geertz's definition of religion as a cultural system was dominant for most of the 20th century and continues to be widely accepted today.Sociologists and anthropologists tend to see religion as an abstract set of ideas, values, or experiences developed as part of a cultural matrix. For example, in Lindbeck's Nature of Doctrine, religion does not refer to belief in God or a transcendent Absolute. Instead, Lindbeck defines religion as, a kind of cultural and\\\/or linguistic framework or medium that shapes the entirety of life and thought… it is similar to an idiom that makes possible the description of realities, the formulation of beliefs, and the experiencing of inner attitudes, feelings, and sentiments.”[23] According to this definition, religion refers to one's primary worldview and how this dictates one's thoughts and actions. Thus religion is considered by some sources to extend to causes, principles, or activities believed in with zeal or conscientious devotion concerning points or matters of ethics or conscience, and not necessarily including belief in the supernatural.[24]Although evolutionists had previously sought to understand and explain religion in terms of a cultural attribute which might conceivably confer biological advantages to its adherents, Richard Dawkins called for a re-analysis of religion in terms of the evolution of self-replicating ideas apart from any resulting biological advantages they might bestow. He argued that the role of key replicator in cultural evolution belongs not to genes, but to memes replicating thought from person to person by means of imitation. These replicators respond to selective pressures that may or may not affect biological reproduction or survival.[25] Susan Blackmore regards religions as particularly tenacious memes.[26] Chris Hedges, however, regards meme theory as a misleading imposition of genetics onto psychology.Interfaith cooperationBecause religion continues to be recognized in Western thought as a universal impulse, many religious practitioners have aimed to band together in interfaith dialogue and cooperation. The first major dialogue was the Parliament of the World's Religions at the 1893 Chicago World's Fair, which remains notable even today both in affirming universal values and recognition of the diversity of practices among different cultures. The 20th century has been especially fruitful in use of interfaith dialogue as a means of solving ethnic, political, or even religious conflict, with Christian-Jewish reconciliation representing a complete reverse in the attitudes of many Christian communities towards Jews.Secularism and criticism of religionMain articles: Criticism of religion, Antireligion, Secularism, Agnosticism, and AtheismAs religion became a more personal matter, discussions of society found a new focus on political and scientific meaning, and religious attitudes were increasingly seen as irrelevant for the needs of the European world. On the political side, Ludwig Feuerbach recast Christian beliefs in light of humanism, paving the way for Karl Marx's famous characterization of religion as the opiate of the masses. Meanwhile, in the scientific community, T.H. Huxley in 1869 coined the term agnostic, a term subsequently adopted by such figures as Robert Ingersoll. Later, Bertrand Russell told the world Why I Am Not a Christian.Atheists have developed a critique of religious systems as well as personal faith. Modern-day critics focus on religion's lack of utility in human society, faulting religion as being irrational.[27] Some assert that dogmatic religions are in effect morally deficient, elevating to moral status ancient, arbitrary, and ill-informed rules—taboos on eating pork, for example, as well as dress codes and sexual practices[28]—possibly designed for reasons of hygiene or even mere politics in a bygone era.In North America and Western Europe the social fallout of the 9\\\/11 attacks contributed in part to the appearance of numerous pro-secularist books, such as The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins, The End of Faith by Sam Harris, and God is not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything by Christopher Hitchens. This criticism is largely, but not entirely, focused on the monotheistic Abrahamic traditions.Religious beliefCentral Asian (Tocharian) and East-Asian Buddhist monks, Bezeklik, Eastern Tarim Basin, 9th-10th centuryMain article: Religious beliefReligious belief usually relates to the existence, nature and worship of a deity or deities and divine involvement in the universe and human life. Alternately, it may also relate to values and practices transmitted by a spiritual leader. Unlike other belief systems, which may be passed on orally, religious belief tends to be codified in literate societies (religion in non-literate societies is still largely passed on orally[29]). In some religions, like the Abrahamic religions, it is held that most of the core beliefs have been divinely revealed.Religious belief can also involve causes, principles or activities believed in with zeal or conscientious devotion concerning points or matters of ethics or conscience, not necessarily limited to organized religions
有关“励志向上做合格青年”的主题演讲稿
当前，“青少年xing教并非“犹抱琵琶半遮面”的新鲜名词。
欣喜的是，相关机构、组织、调研和项目纷繁多样，各类会议、研讨、信息和报告层出不穷；担忧的是，系统而有力的政策支持体系依然不甚清晰，不少教育和服务的理念、原则和方法仍不能与时俱进，青少年对xing教育的参与度和满意度仍不容乐观。
参与青少年xing与生殖健康教育工作多年，感受颇多，其中体会最深的是：在组织开展青少年xing教育活动中，要特别加强对“态度”这一环节的重视。
建立对xing的良好态度是促进行为改变的重要环节和因素，甚至影响到青少年终生的价值观、人际关系和身体健康。
一、 KAP模式看“态度”的重要性 关于复杂的行为改变过程，各国学者提出多种理论。
其中，AKP模式是应用较多的理论模式之一。
KAP，即“knowledge，attitude，practice”的缩略简称，它将人类行为的改变分为获取知识、建立态度和形成行为三个连续过程。
KAP模式认为：知识是基础，态度是动力，行为的产生和改变是目标。
人们通过学习，获得相关的健康知识和技能，逐步形成健康的信念和态度，从而促成健康行为的产生。
知识与行为之间有着重要的联系，但不完全是因果关系。
从知识转变成行为需要特别条件，其中，“态度”是重要的因素。
“吸烟”是经常被用来阐述KAP模式的例子，也是我们xing教育培训有效的热身活动之一。
当幻灯片上打出“吸烟有害健康”的字样时，请大家高声朗读，然后提出一系列问题：你吸烟吗
你熟悉的人有吸烟的吗
你或那些你熟悉的人能像你一样准确地读出并理解这些字的含义吗
曾经尝试过戒烟吗
成功者居多还是失败者居多
当具备相当认知能力、甚至是高水准教育背景和社会地位的成年人，在明确知晓“吸烟有害健康”时还依旧维持着吸烟嗜好，我们该怎样理解“知识”和“行为”之间的关系
如果是青少年面对同样或类似的问题又会怎样
直接、简明的问题和思考往往令参与者在若有所思、会心而笑。
的确，尽管掌握了“吸烟有害健康”的知识，然而，要采取健康的行为，必须建立积极的态度，对知识信息进行有根据的独立思考，形成强烈的责任感，逐步建立明确的态度和信念。
知识上升为态度与信念，才可以支配人的行动。
当吸烟者采取积极的戒烟态度，相信吸烟有害健康，并相信自己有能力戒烟时，戒烟才有可能成功。
尽管我们也许不能确定“生命教育”中有关青春期生理、生殖与避孕等内容是否已经真正在中学课堂上进行传授,尽管我们也不能确定社区计划生育工作者热心发放的有关xing与生殖健康的宣传资料是否真正被社区和流动人口未婚青年认真阅读，但有一点我们可以达成共识，那就是青少年获得xing知识信息并非仅限于我们所认为的主流渠道。
虽然我们面对网络、报刊、影视和同伴交流等心存忧虑，但它们的确已客观地成为在青少年群体中传播和学习性知识的常见方式。
然而，当“月经、精子、卵子、性交、安全套、毓婷、人流……”等字眼不再为许多青少年感到陌生时，我们依然面临着青少年xing行为前移、不安全xing行为、意外怀孕和不安全流产的问题，以及因为xing问题引起的更为令人遗憾的悲剧。
审视KAP模式，“态度”跃然而出。
多元化渠道传递的知识信息或许无异，但关于建立良好xing态度的缺如和偏差，可能成为造成青少年xing与生殖健康问题的重要因素，成为青少年xing教育中亟需关注与强化的环节。
二、良好的性态度与人生态度 真正引发青少年在“xing”方面产生严重冲突或适应困难的，往往不是青少年在xing方面实际做了什么，而是其对“xing”所持有的看法和做法，也就是“xing态度”。
当“生命教育”已通过教育部门的行政手段列为中小学教学计划，围绕青少年xing教育，其他的政府部门、社会组织、科研机构、社区家庭依然拥有广阔、活跃的工作和交流平台，这充分体现了“xing教育”不同于一般的基础文化教育，其真正含义绝非单纯的知识传递，而是帮助青少年建立良好的态度，付诸健康的行动。
xing态度的形成是人类社会化过程的一个重要组成部分，因此需要在社会的环境中培育和发展。
一般而言，xing态度包括对自身有关“xing”的看法，如，如何看待自己的身体变化和xing的冲动与感受
喜欢异性还是同性
是否愿意有婚前xing行为或婚外xing行为
同时，xing态度还包括对于社会上存在的xing现象的看法，比如，一位异性恋者，自己拒绝婚前xing行为和婚外xing行为，对那些同性恋者、婚外恋者，还有婚前发生xing行为的人持怎样的态度
… 归纳而言，良好的xing态度可以归纳为四方面的原则：1）客观。
将xing知识看作科学知识的组成部分，能够主动地、坦然地通过主流渠道（如课内教育、科普信息、医学咨询、家庭与同伴的交流等）学习相关知识和信息。
能够认同性是人类生命与生活的一部分，在人生各阶段都能以适当的方式感受和表达自己的xing。
理解xing的整体含义，接纳自我，包括自己的性别、性角色和xing需要。
2）尊重。
理解亲密关系的内涵和意义，能够较好地与同性和异性相处和沟通，尊重他人的性选择，不侵害、不利用、不强制。
3）健康。
能够理解安全的xing行为的含义，有主动预防非意愿妊娠、性病、艾滋病的传播的意识。
4）负责。
了解xing与生殖健康的权利，认同xing行为是建立在双方自愿、诚实、安全、快乐的基础上。
对自己的感受和行为负责，对xing行为可能引起的结果负责。
可以看出，良好的xing态度聚焦于“客观、尊重、健康、负责”，涉及到如何看待知识的获取、自我的悦纳、人际的交流、彼此的尊重、负责任的决定。
这些内容其实也同样适用于人生态度的确立。
因此，在提供科学准确的xing健康知识的同时，深化对xing态度的讨论和教育，对xing有更广更深的了解和理解，会帮助青少年学会全面、客观、积极地看待生活，稳定的xing情感和良好的xing适应有助于推迟他们可能出现的xing行为，也使得初次xing行为的发生更趋于理性，对今后处理婚姻家庭关系，乃至工作学习中的问题，都有积极的影响。
三、帮助青少年建立良好的xing态度 强调青少年xing与生殖健康权利，包括青少年获得相关的xing与生殖健康教育和服务的权利，成年人则承担着相关义务和责任。
帮助青少年建立良好的xing态度、做好未来的人生计划，是青少年xing教育的重要内容。
首先，成年人的“态度”至关重要。
传统文化的熏陶、社会特殊发展进程的影响，使许多成年人在青少年面前不自觉地持居高临下的施与态度，在xing教育领域更易如此。
重新认识成年人与青少年的关系、家长与孩子的关系，是成年人需要首先思考、理解和接纳的，为此，许多青少年xing教育项目将师资、家长等纳入培训人群，共同构建“学校、社区、家庭”系统教育平台。
特别值得一提的是，成年人要逐步认识到不应将xing“问题化”，而是勇于肯定并和青少年讨论xing可以带来亲密愉悦，是人的重要成长经历和经验，不单一强调xing所带来的负面结果。
这样的态度体现了对xing教育全面内涵的理解，也与青少年自身在成长中的感受相吻合，有助于建立与青少年的有效沟通。
其次，开展综合性的人生技能教育。
如前所述，无论是校内还是社区的青少年xing教育，不能单纯局限于灌输式的生理知识教育和说教式的道德教育。
近年来，广为国际社会认可的人生技能培训（Life Skill Training）在我国青少年xing教育领域得到应用，值得推广。
人生技能培训包括了迎接青春期、人际交往、xing行为与决定、预防性病艾滋病、预防意外怀孕、远离毒品等。
特别值得一提的是，其将“未来计划”作为独立培训单元，将xing健康与未来的婚姻、家庭、健康和事业发展等置于整体框架下考虑，帮助青少年展望和思考，将未来与自己的态度、决定、行为联系起来，进一步强化和提升了建立积极性态度的重要性。
第三，注重青少年的主体地位和积极参与。
青少年是建立良好xing态度的主体，因此在教育方法上要尊重这种客观的主体地位，并尽可能地为青少年的参与搭建平台、创造机会。
培训课堂上的参与式方法，拓展活动中的同伴教育和多元化的主题活动，都应鼓励青少年策划、表达、讨论和倾听，努力让青少年感受到：无论青少年他们具有怎样的xing取向，有无xing经验，来自什么样的家庭、宗教信仰或文化背景，有关xing的健康教育都与之相关；形成“客观、健康、尊重、负责”的性态度将使他们受益终生。
