行为规范演讲稿
们，同学们：大家好
自古，人才至上，人品至本，欲成大事拘小节，只有在实际生活中积，才能成大德。
哲学家威廉·詹姆斯说：“播下一种行为，收获一种习惯；播下一种习惯，收获一种性格；播下一种性格，收获一种人生。
”如果把良好的行为习惯看成是一种精神储蓄的话，那么人在其整个一生中都在享受着行为习惯所产生的利息。
有这样的故事：20世纪60年代，苏联宇航员加林，乘坐“东方”号宇宙飞船进入太空遨游了108分钟，成为世界上第一位进入太空的宇航员。
当时几十个宇航员在培训，为什么加林能脱颖而出呢
原来，在确定人选前一个星期，主设计师罗廖夫发现，在进入飞船参观前，只有加林一个人把鞋脱下来，只穿袜子进入座舱。
就是这个细节，一下子赢得了罗廖夫的好感，感动了他。
罗廖夫说：“我只有把飞船交给一个如此爱惜它的人，我才放心。
”所以加林的成功，得益于他良好的习惯。
有人开玩笑说：成功从脱鞋开始。
实际上这个故事告诉我们：好的习惯能够给人带来更多成功的机会，坏的习惯往往使你在不知不觉之中走向失败。
走在着整洁美丽的校园，坐在宽敞明亮的教室，也许你并不在意自己偶然说出的一句脏话，也许你不留心踩在脚下的花草，也许你已经习惯自己旁若无人的喧叫……可是，这时你已经成为美好校园环境的破坏者。
学校是一个育人的摇篮，是一方纯净的沃土，校园的文明直接折射出社会的文明，而每个同学的言行举止也正反映出一个人的文明素养程度。
然而，在校园中出现的一些不文明不道德现象值得我们重新进行思考。
为了进一步规范言谈举止，提升思想境界，培养良好的学习与生活习惯，适应终身发展的需要，成为有大家之气、大家风范的精英学生，为将来报效祖国，服务人民，幸福人生奠定坚实的基础。
作为海中学子，最基本的就是应该遵守《中学生守则》《中学生行为规范细则》，从自身的仪表仪容、言谈举止、生活起居、学习行为、与人交往等方面来进一步养成良好的习惯。
大教育家夸美纽斯曾说：“德行的实现是由行为，不是由文字或者口号。
”好习惯不是说出来的，而是从实践中体现出来的。
勿以恶小而为之，勿以善小而不为。
我希望大家能从现在做起，从学习、生活、交往的每一个细节做起，比如：穿着朴素，发型大方；不使用手机、MP3，不进入营业性网吧、茶厅、歌厅。
骑自行车进出校门，要下车推行，按照指定位置停放并上锁；不在校外摊点吃东西；在食堂就餐时，安静就餐，不大声说话；打喷嚏或咳嗽时要用手捂住嘴巴；见到老师轻声问候“老师好。
”进出教室、办公室轻轻推门，随手关门；上下楼梯轻上缓下，靠右行走；排队集会静齐快，列队整齐有精神；能弯腰捡起你能捡的垃圾。
自觉爱护公共设施；课间不在走廊上、教室里追逐打闹。
许许多多的细节，不胜枚举。
3月5日是学雷锋日，其实我上面所讲的也是雷锋精神的新时代表现。
我相信，只要我们的同学心中装着他人，时时注意文明，就一定会展示出绅士风度和淑女风范。
中学生是国家和社会主义现代化建设的预备队，在你们的身上寄托着国家和民族的希望。
但从生理和心理特点看，你们正处在向成年人过渡期间，各方面还不成熟，也是情感最激烈、最充满冲动、幻想而最容易动摇的时期。
生理学家和心理学家把青春期称之为“人生的第二次诞生”。
这个时期的青少年不大了解自己所作所为的深切后果，血气方刚，说干就干，容易意气用事，这或许会干出许多惊天动地的壮烈义举，也或许会导致违法犯罪铸成终身憾事。
学校里，同学间总会有些矛盾和摩擦，同学们要互相关心和尊重，友爱相处，团结合作。
如遇意见相左、出现矛盾的情况，一定要有法制观念，要冷静处事，决不可意气用事，更不可挥拳相向，伤及自身或他人。
同学们，我们海中有着严肃的校纪和优良的校风，你们作为海中的学生，更应该严格要求自己，无愧于阳光，无愧于社会
就让我们从现在开始，播下好习惯，收获绚丽人生吧
我相信，通过我们的共同努力，一定会营造出一个宁静、有序、有着良好学习环境的美丽校园。
谢谢大家
爱国的演讲稿300字
少年兴则国兴，小年强则国强。
我们要适应时代发展的要求，正确认识祖国的历史和现实，增强爱国的情感和振兴祖国的责任感，树立民族自尊心与自信心；弘扬伟大的中华民族精神，高举爱国主义旗帜，锐意进取，自强不息，艰苦奋斗，顽强拼搏，真正把爱国之志变成报国之行。
今天为振兴中华而勤奋学习，明天为创造祖国辉煌未来贡献自己的力量
回答者：月亮柠檬海 - 助理 二级 9-26 17:25 捧起一把泥土，我说，这是我的祖国；掬起一朵浪花，我说，这是我的祖国；翻开发黄的《四库全书》，我说，这是我的祖国；弹一曲悠扬的《高山流水》，我说，这是我的祖国
啊，祖国
我是在圆明园里，认识了您的屈辱、您的悲愤；我是在八达岭上，认识了您的磅礴、您的巍峨；我是在大漠草原，认识了您的宽广、您的辽阔；我是在驿道古渡，认识了您的悠久，您的坎坷。
面对荆棘林莽、重峦叠嶂、泥淖沼泽，有无数忠贞的儿女，不怕洒尽热血，抛却头颅，尸裹马革
直到51年前那个金秋十月，一面鲜艳的五星红旗，一位巨人的宣言，使一个古老民族傲然屹立，纵情欢乐。
关于诚信的演讲稿，字数在300左右
尊敬老师、亲爱的同学们:大家好! 我演讲的题目是“诚信与我们同行.” 站在国旗下,举目仰望那高高飘扬的红旗,眼前顿时展现出一幅雄鸡傲立的画面——我们伟大祖国的版图.心中不禁感想万千,每当这个时刻,我们都沉浸在雄壮的国歌声中,庄重而严肃的向祖国,向国旗默默许下自己的志愿.新一代的我们身上担负着千斤重担,我们作为祖国最宝贵的财富,首当其冲的一条就是要讲诚信.诚信是什么?农民说,诚信是秋天里结出的丰硕果实;老师说,诚信是师生间如纸般纯洁的感情;工人说,诚信是辛勤劳作下生产出质高价优的产品.简而言之,诚信是个人的立身之本,民族的存亡之根. 翻开我们中华民族五千年的文明史,会发现,以诚实守信为做人根本的故事比比皆是.同时,我们也看到,因失去诚信导致国破家亡的例子也可信手拈来：商纣失信,加速了国家的灭亡;楚怀王失信,不但亡了国,还使一代贤臣——屈原饮恨汩罗江;吴三桂失信,留下千古骂名…….所以,以史为鉴,诚信是我们立身、修德、处事的根本. 诚信对于一个人很重要,对于一个国家则更为重要.一个不讲诚信的个人是社会的危险品,而一个不讲诚信的民族是莫大的悲哀. 因此,我们中学生更应身体力行,从我做起,这样才能在不久的将来担负起建设祖国的重任. 作为未来祖国的主人,我们面对的是一个新科技、新信息、新体制不断涌现,竞争日益激烈的信息时代.要想使自己能够适应于这个时代,使我们的民族立于这个竞争的世界,就必须诚实守信.你可以没有金钱,可以没有荣誉,也可以没有健康,但你不可以没有诚信,因为诚信是个人的立身之本、民族的存亡之根. 同学们诚信做作业,诚信考试,诚信待人,这是顺应时代的号召,是势在必行的.朋友们,让我们从身边的小事做起,不要让诚信只出现在纸上,成为我们的口头禅,要让它活跃在我们当中,让诚信无处不在.同学们,只要我们大家都行动起来,我们的祖国建设将如日中天,欣欣向荣.同学们让我们同声呼喊“诚信与我们同行!”
关于感恩、奉献、志愿的演讲稿
共参考： 感恩演讲稿——回馈社会，回馈人生尊敬的各位评委，亲爱的同学们： 大家好
，我演讲的题目是：“用一颗感恩的心，奉献、回馈社会，回馈人生”。
在整天想着玩泥巴、堆雪人的童年时代，在无知、幼稚却总是故意假装大孩子的少年时代， 在成长而烦恼、懵懂、迷茫的青少年时代，不懂得甚至不：何为志愿，何为奉献
那只是课本中写的，老是课堂中讲的，而非的。
然而，在走过生命几度春秋之后的，蓦然回首，：从生命的那一刻起，就被他人、被社会以一颗珍贵的心呵护着、守护着。
父母用无私的爱护住生命的根，老师用知识浇灌的生命之树，朋友用友爱滋润着成长路上的每一天，陌生的人们则用的让不感到孤单，而社会又以它独特的温馨、与安定给了无忧的生长空间。
在的生命悄然走过四分后，开始思考：再过二十年里，似乎一直在获取，在心安理得的着来自社会各界的帮助与照顾。
那么，二十年后的，是该做些的时候了，是该以一颗志愿之心奉献社会的时候了。
志愿与奉献，绝单纯的、冠冕堂皇的口号，它真正需要的是的行动，是时刻去践行身为大学生、公民、生命所承担的责任。
雷锋曾说过：“一滴水融入大海，才永远不干涸。
”把自身融入集体、融入社会，对困境中的人帮助，真诚的为服务，才能人生的真正价值。
有人说，雷锋精神渐渐离远去，然而倘若果真如此，又怎会涌现出一批批令国人甚至令世界动容的人物呢
在奥运赛场上，闪亮的不只是运动员，还有的奥运志愿者，的身影随处可见，的汗水挥洒在奥运会场的每个角落，的笑容展现在奥运盛事的每个瞬间。
有着一颗不计得失、志愿服务的金子般的心；曾记否，在那硝烟却异常惨烈的非典战场上，的白衣天使同样是怀着一颗不惧生死、甘愿奉献的心与病魔顽强作战；曾记否，5月12日下午2时28分，四川汶川了8。
0级得大地震，它震动了，震动了世界，也震动了无数有志之士。
的人、子弟兵、医护人员、志愿者在赶赴灾区，可曾想过：下一秒，还能自由呼吸
还能睁眼看世界
还能见一眼最亲爱的人
不，不曾想，为
，只是的告诉：不可以停，不可以停，一秒也不可以停
，错过一秒，就有错过生命
张米亚老师走了，向倩走了，无数的英雄走了，泪如雨下，但知道从未离开，化作天使，把奉献的种子撒如每个人的心窝——那片最肥沃的心之田
同学们，让用爱守护这颗前人用真心、用鲜血、用生命换来的宝贵的种子，让它迅速的成长，支撑起信仰的殿堂，开启爱心的征程。
让像那些平凡而又的生命宣誓：将用这颗奉献的心，回馈社会，回馈人生
信仰的力量英文演讲稿
说实话我是COPY的.你看看能不能用把.A religion is a system of human thought which usually includes a set of narratives, symbols, beliefs and practices that give meaning to the practitioner's experiences of life through reference to a higher power, deity or deities, or ultimate truth.[1] Religion is commonly identified by the practitioner's prayer, ritual, meditation, music and art, among other things, and is often interwoven with society and politics. It may focus on specific supernatural, metaphysical, and moral claims about reality (the cosmos and human nature) which may yield a set of religious laws, ethics, and a particular lifestyle. Religion also encompasses ancestral or cultural traditions, writings, history, and mythology, as well as personal faith and religious experience.The term religion refers to both the personal practices related to communal faith and to group rituals and communication stemming from shared conviction. Religion is sometimes used interchangeably with faith or belief system,[2] but it is more socially defined than personal convictions, and it entails specific behaviors, respectively.In the frame of western religious thought,[3] religions present a common quality, the hallmark of patriarchal religious thought: the division of the world in two comprehensive domains, one sacred, the other profane.[4] According to the futurist Raymond Kurzweil, The primary role of traditional religion is deathist rationalization—that is, rationalizing the tragedy of death as a good thing.[5] Religion is often described as a communal system for the coherence of belief focusing on a system of thought, unseen being, person, or object, that is considered to be supernatural, sacred, divine, or of the highest truth. Moral codes, practices, values, institutions, tradition, rituals, and scriptures are often traditionally associated with the core belief, and these may have some overlap with concepts in secular philosophy. Religion is also often described as a way of life or a life stance Religion and the body politicA good understanding of the meaning of Christianity before the word religion came into common usage can be found in St. Augustine's writing. For Augustine, Christianity was a disciplina, a rule just like that of the Roman Empire. Christianity was therefore a power structure opposing and superseding human institutions, a literal Kingdom of Heaven. Rather than calling one to self-discipline through symbols, it was itself the discipline taught by one's family, school, church, and city authorities.[11] However at this point the root of the English word religion, the Latin religio, was in use only to mean reverence for God or the gods, careful pondering of divine things, piety (which Cicero further derived to mean diligence[12]); in other words, there was no sense of a system nor even of the Christian power structure but only of spirituality.[13] Max Müller characterized many other cultures around the world, including Egypt, Persia, and India, as having a similar power structure at this point in history. What we would call religion today, they would only call law.[14]As Christianity became commonplace, the charismatic authority identified by Augustine, a quality we might today call religiousness, had a commanding influence at the local level. This system persisted in the Byzantine Empire following the East-West Schism, while Western Europe regulated unpredictable expressions of charisma through the Roman Catholic Church. However, as the Church lost its dominance during the Protestant Reformation and Christianity became closely tied to political structures, religion was recast as the basis of national sovereignty, and religious identity gradually became a less universal sense of spirituality and more divisive, locally defined, and tied to nationality.[15] It was at this point that religion was dissociated with universal beliefs and moved closer to dogma in both meaning and practice. However there was not yet the idea of dogma as personal choice, only of established churches.Religious freedomIn the Age of Enlightenment, the idea of Christianity as the purest expression of spirituality was supplanted by the concept of religion as a worldwide practice.[16] This caused such ideas as religious freedom, a reexamination of classical philosophy as an alternative to Christian thought, and more radically Deism among intellectuals such as Voltaire. Much like Christianity, the idea of religious freedom was exported around the world as a civilizing technique, even to regions like India that had never treated spirituality as a matter of political identity.[17] In Japan, where Buddhism was still seen as a philosophy of natural law,[18] the concept of religion and religious freedom as separate from other power structures was unnecessary until Christian missionaries demanded free access to conversion, and when Japanese Christians refused to engage in patriotic events.[19]With the Enlightenment religion lost its attachment to nationality, but rather than being a universal social attitude, it was now a personal feeling, or emotion.[20] Friedrich Schleiermacher in the late 18th century defined religion as das schlechthinnige Abhängigkeitsgefühl, commonly translated as a feeling of absolute dependence.[21] His contemporary Hegel disagreed thoroughly, defining religion as the Divine Spirit becoming conscious of Himself through the finite spirit.[22] William James is an especially notable 19th century subscriber to the theory of religion as feeling.Confucianism, Taoism, and Buddhism are one, a painting in the litang style portraying three men laughing by a river stream, 12th century, Song DynastyModern currents in religionReligious studiesWith the recognition of religion as a category separate from culture and society came the rise of religious studies. Clifford Geertz's definition of religion as a cultural system was dominant for most of the 20th century and continues to be widely accepted today.Sociologists and anthropologists tend to see religion as an abstract set of ideas, values, or experiences developed as part of a cultural matrix. For example, in Lindbeck's Nature of Doctrine, religion does not refer to belief in God or a transcendent Absolute. Instead, Lindbeck defines religion as, a kind of cultural and\\\/or linguistic framework or medium that shapes the entirety of life and thought… it is similar to an idiom that makes possible the description of realities, the formulation of beliefs, and the experiencing of inner attitudes, feelings, and sentiments.”[23] According to this definition, religion refers to one's primary worldview and how this dictates one's thoughts and actions. Thus religion is considered by some sources to extend to causes, principles, or activities believed in with zeal or conscientious devotion concerning points or matters of ethics or conscience, and not necessarily including belief in the supernatural.[24]Although evolutionists had previously sought to understand and explain religion in terms of a cultural attribute which might conceivably confer biological advantages to its adherents, Richard Dawkins called for a re-analysis of religion in terms of the evolution of self-replicating ideas apart from any resulting biological advantages they might bestow. He argued that the role of key replicator in cultural evolution belongs not to genes, but to memes replicating thought from person to person by means of imitation. These replicators respond to selective pressures that may or may not affect biological reproduction or survival.[25] Susan Blackmore regards religions as particularly tenacious memes.[26] Chris Hedges, however, regards meme theory as a misleading imposition of genetics onto psychology.Interfaith cooperationBecause religion continues to be recognized in Western thought as a universal impulse, many religious practitioners have aimed to band together in interfaith dialogue and cooperation. The first major dialogue was the Parliament of the World's Religions at the 1893 Chicago World's Fair, which remains notable even today both in affirming universal values and recognition of the diversity of practices among different cultures. The 20th century has been especially fruitful in use of interfaith dialogue as a means of solving ethnic, political, or even religious conflict, with Christian-Jewish reconciliation representing a complete reverse in the attitudes of many Christian communities towards Jews.Secularism and criticism of religionMain articles: Criticism of religion, Antireligion, Secularism, Agnosticism, and AtheismAs religion became a more personal matter, discussions of society found a new focus on political and scientific meaning, and religious attitudes were increasingly seen as irrelevant for the needs of the European world. On the political side, Ludwig Feuerbach recast Christian beliefs in light of humanism, paving the way for Karl Marx's famous characterization of religion as the opiate of the masses. Meanwhile, in the scientific community, T.H. Huxley in 1869 coined the term agnostic, a term subsequently adopted by such figures as Robert Ingersoll. Later, Bertrand Russell told the world Why I Am Not a Christian.Atheists have developed a critique of religious systems as well as personal faith. Modern-day critics focus on religion's lack of utility in human society, faulting religion as being irrational.[27] Some assert that dogmatic religions are in effect morally deficient, elevating to moral status ancient, arbitrary, and ill-informed rules—taboos on eating pork, for example, as well as dress codes and sexual practices[28]—possibly designed for reasons of hygiene or even mere politics in a bygone era.In North America and Western Europe the social fallout of the 9\\\/11 attacks contributed in part to the appearance of numerous pro-secularist books, such as The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins, The End of Faith by Sam Harris, and God is not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything by Christopher Hitchens. This criticism is largely, but not entirely, focused on the monotheistic Abrahamic traditions.Religious beliefCentral Asian (Tocharian) and East-Asian Buddhist monks, Bezeklik, Eastern Tarim Basin, 9th-10th centuryMain article: Religious beliefReligious belief usually relates to the existence, nature and worship of a deity or deities and divine involvement in the universe and human life. Alternately, it may also relate to values and practices transmitted by a spiritual leader. Unlike other belief systems, which may be passed on orally, religious belief tends to be codified in literate societies (religion in non-literate societies is still largely passed on orally[29]). In some religions, like the Abrahamic religions, it is held that most of the core beliefs have been divinely revealed.Religious belief can also involve causes, principles or activities believed in with zeal or conscientious devotion concerning points or matters of ethics or conscience, not necessarily limited to organized religions
积极向上爱国的3分钟演讲稿
大家好!今天我演题目是《歌国》高唱国歌走向未来国响凌云壮志；国旗飘扬，扬世纪豪情。
思绪随国旗漫卷，记忆在晨风中长歌。
回顾中华，历经民族屈辱与沧桑。
“起来，不愿做奴录的人们，中华民族到了最危险的时候……”“平津危机!华北危机
中华民族危机
”日本帝国主义的铁蹄踩踏着中华的躯体，民族危机之时，1935年12月9日，北平数千名学生，走上街头，游行示威。
一时旗帜如海，标语成林。
“打倒日本帝国主义
”、“反对华亲自治
”的口号场，如阵阵春雷，震天动地。
再一次奏响了时代的强音，掀起了抗日救亡的高潮。
时光冲淡了悲愤的呐喊，岁月吹散了弥漫的硝烟，但那奉献的精神和爱国的豪情，永远沉淀在沸腾的热血之中。
风风雨雨，祖国已从稚嫩走向成熟；艰苦创业，历史已揭开了新的篇章。
展未来，长征接力有来人，世纪轮转代代新。
我们今天十八九岁的年轻人，正是跨世纪的新一代，面对先人与后辈，面对历史与未来，容不得有半点懈怠与彷徨。
志当存高远，沉醉于昨天只能让我们踌躇不前。
既然沉睡的“雄狮”已经惊醒，我们面对前程只能奋力开拓
既然紧闭的国门已经打开，我们的未来只能是除旧布新
先辈们以无数的青春热血为我们创下千秋基业。
告慰英魂，我们更应该昂首向前
让我们挽起青春的臂膀，让我们放飞绚丽的梦想，让我们高唱国歌走向未来，共创世纪的辉煌
给我一篇以“希望”为主题的演讲稿
希望是引导人成功的信仰，是人生奋斗的目标，是实现，是平凡生活的小小期待，是攀登者的拐杖，是生命之舟的原动力，是补充能源的加油站。
我们因希望而生活，世界因希望而多彩。
希望可以将人引入辉煌，也可以将你诱入歧途。
希望创造了一个个大大小小的故事。
希望孕育着振聋发聩的哲理睿思。
日有所思，夜有所梦。
梦，反映人内心的欲望；梦，是一种渴望。
梦寐以求，是说人睡梦中都想着寻找，那一定是一种迫切的希望。
蝴蝶幼虫的梦想一定是变成一只美丽的蝴蝶；断了水的在大漠中的旅行者的梦想一定是发现一条小河；瘫痪的作家、的梦想一定是自己突然有一双会跑的腿，甚至是插上了翅膀。
花季少年多美梦。
不过，要想好梦成真，必得坚韧不拔地努力奋斗。
总之，梦想是进取的目标，是对生活的一种积极的态度和一种深深的企盼。
正是有了梦想，这个世界才变得生动而丰富多彩，因为有了飞翔的梦想，才发明了飞机，因为有了光明的梦想，才发明了电灯。
所以，一个人可以失败，可以遭受挫折，但不可以失去梦想。
因为失去梦想的人生就像鸟儿失去了双翼，船失去了双桨。
追求是用积极的行动来争取达到某种目的。
追求真理，追求科学，追求艺术，追求知识，追求事业，追求高尚的品格，追求远大的理想，这些都是美好的追求。
追求要专心致志，要勤奋刻苦，要善于思考，要坚持不懈。
正因为如此，追求会演绎出许多大大小小的感人故事，会碰撞出五光十色的思想火花。
饥寒中，人们探索温饱；黑暗中，人们探索光明；好奇中，人们探索未知。
有了探索，陌生的世界才在我们的眼前展现了它丰富的内涵；有了探索，人们才一步步叩开包孕大自然和人类社会的奥密之门。
探索，就是人不停息地迈向美好未来的脚步。
收获好成绩，收获奖牌，收获丰收的果实，收获事业的成功，收获友谊，收获亲情……收获让人快乐，给人惊喜。
然而，收获的背后却是汗水和辛劳。
这之中，有太多的苦辣酸甜，有太多的感人故事
