求一篇关于安乐死的英文作文
What shall we do to a person when he is seriously iii and the hope of his keeping alive is very slight? Should we try every means to prolong his life in agony or should we just stop trying to do nothing useful and inject some kind of drugs into his body so that this person may no longer suffer? Drug killing in this case is what is called Euthanasia, or mercy killing.Different people have different attitudes towards euthanasia. Some are of the opinion that euthanasia is necessary because it can relieve the fatally sick patient from both physical and psychological torture. Practicing this can save the other family members, relatives, and friends from the pain of having to witness torture that the patient does not otherwise need to bear from certain incurable illnesses. However, certain other people may argue that euthanasia is not a cure but a murder.I am inclined to be strongly supportive on the practice of euthanasia. For one thing, it is meaningless to spend money on a patient that is definitely hopeless. Human beings, like everything living in this world, are mortal. No one can avoid death. In cases of serious diseases that go beyond the knowledge and skills of doctors, no one can help no matter what his family members try to de. For another, fatally sick patients usually need expensive medicines and intensive treatment. This means they are wasting medical resources that can reasonably be used on patients who really need them to recover. Lastly, some patients themselves do not want to suffer from the pain if they know that they are not curable. To conclude, I think practicing euthanasia is necessary, and legislative organizations should pass laws on it so that nothing more should be wasted on those who can not be saved.翻译:我们应怎样一个人时，他正在认真三和他保持活着的希望是微乎其微
我们应千方百计延长他的痛苦生活，还是应该只停留在做什么有益的，他的身体注入一些药物，使此人可能不再受苦
药物在这种情况下杀人是所谓的“安乐死”，或安乐死。
不同的人对安乐死有不同的态度。
有些人认为，安乐死是必要的，因为它可以减轻从生理和心理的致命病病人的酷刑。
实践这可以节省其他家庭成员，亲属，并从有痛苦的朋友见证酷刑，病人没有其他需要承受一定的不可治愈的疾病。
然而，某些人会说，安乐死是不治本，而是谋杀。
我倾向于要加强对实施安乐死的支持。
一方面，是没有意义的花病人的钱是绝对没有希望的。
人类一样，在这个世界上的一切生活，都是致命的。
没有人能避免死亡。
在重大疾病案件，超出了医生的知识和技能，没有人能帮助不管他的家人试图超越。
其次，致命的病病人通常需要昂贵的药品和强化治疗。
这意味着他们是在浪费可以合理的病人谁真正需要他们的医疗资源回收利用。
最后，有些病人自己也不想遭受的痛苦，如果他们知道，他们无法治愈的。
最后，我觉得练安乐死是必要的，立法机构应该通过法律，它没有什么更多的应该是谁浪费在那些无法保存。
以安乐死为话题的英语作文
The fast advance of medicine and life–extending technologies enable life to be prolonged 。
But it’s this leap of technologies to prolong life and control dying that raises the controversial topic—euthanasia( 安乐死)or mercy killing. People supporting mercy killing argue that euthanasia is humane because it helps to hasten the death of hopelessly ill patients，relieving them from the agonizing pain , which is good for both the doomed people and their families. For these people，staving off death is to compromise a fundamental value—the quality of human life. However，those who object to euthanasia think it is immoral to give up treatment or commit suicide with doctors’ assistance。
In their opinions, that is nothing less than murdering.
关于反对安乐死的英语资料
我天外教课期末考试辩论好是这个，这的辩论素材Euthanasia is to kill people. Life is so important for every one. People don’t only live for themselves, but they also live for their families and the society. If they choose to leave the world, they are not responsible for themselves, their families and the society. Euthanasia is disparagement of life. Life is so precious. Patients should cherish their life. They should try their best to prevail incurable disease. Everyone should show basic respect for life. No matter what happens, we should face up to the facts, we should live on with great courage, we should believe in wonder. Nothing is impossible. Euthanasia stops the medicine developing. If the patients require using euthanasia, doctors won’t try their best to save patients. The medicine will stop progress. If making euthanasia is made legal, patients who use euthanasia will be protected by law. The doctors’ right will be obvious. Doctors are given too much power, and can be wrong or unethical. Patients put their faith and trust in the opinions of their doctor.people abuse euthanasia when it is legalized, it can harm people lives. In the name of euthanasia, carry out committing suicide. Miracle cures or recoveries can occur. You can never underestimate the power of the human spirit.It demeans the value of human life. In this country, human life means something.It could open the floodgates to non-critical patient suicides and other abuses. Any loosening of the assisted-suicide laws could eventually lead to abuses of the privilege.Many religions prohibit suicide and the intentional killing of others. The most basic commandment is You shall not kill.Insurance companies may put undue pressure on doctors to avoid heroic measures or recommend the assisted-suicide procedure. Health insurance providers are under tremendous pressure to keep premiums down.Euthanasia can become a means of health care cost containment..Physicians and other medical care people should not be involved in directly causing death.Mercy killing is morally incorrect and should be forbidden by law.It's a homicide and murdering another human cannot be rationalized under any circumstances.Human life deserves exceptional security and protection. Advanced medical technology has made it possible to enhance human life span and quality of life. Palliative care and rehabilitation centers are better alternatives to help disabled or patients approaching death live a pain-free and better life.Family members influencing the patient's decision into euthanasia for personal gains like wealth inheritance is another issue. There is no way you can be really sure if the decision towards assisted suicide is voluntary or forced by others.Mercy killing would cause decline in medical care and cause victimization of the most vulnerable society. Would mercy killing transform itself from the right to die to right to kill?How would one assess whether a disorder of mental nature qualifies mercy killing? What if the pain threshold is below optimum and the patient perceives the circumstances to be not worthy of living? How would one know whether the wish to die is the result of unbalanced thought process or a logical decision in mentally ill patients? What if the individual chooses assisted suicide as an option and the family wouldn't agree?As to face the parting, helplessness, loss of self-control, fear of death and sorrow and so the majority of patients will experience mental suffering. In this psychological requirement under the Euthanasia, we can say that he is reasonable? According to the study of suicide, suicide and treatable mental illness is intrinsically related, but not the fatal disease, a study found that in 44 patients with advanced cancer, only three thought about suicide, but are there is a serious depression. Another study shows that 85 suicides, only one person suffering from terminal illness, and 90-100% of the suicides were suffering from obvious mental illness. Undeniably, the modern medical practice slow death process, often cited the loss of personal characteristics of patients Mei, dignity, independence and autonomy. However, the expression of active euthanasia as acts of personal autonomy, it is wrong. Reasons: (a) Since active euthanasia need help, then it is not an individual matter, but the open or in the public thing. (B) under the public recognition to self-defense, capital punishment and justice in the form of war, murder, only to defend the life for everyone, not to the benefit of those killed. So, even if death is painful relief, can not be lightly taken away the right to life committed to personal. (C) even if the person's self-determination recognized the right to choose to die, that does not mean the right to ask others to kill themselves, does not include the right to authorize self to kill others. (D) autonomy, including the right of slavery has never been their own, in other words, the right to freedom does not mean the right not to freedom. So to maintain the autonomy, the need to protect life, to give others their right to life is not trampling the principle of maintaining independence. Therefore, individual autonomy and social need and public objectives and values to be consistent. active euthanasia may gradually lose its spontaneity, and thus out of (i) secret euthanasia, meaning that without their own consent, to be a doctor euthanized. (Ii) forced euthanasia, meaning patients suffering from terminal illness would be coercion to lure choose euthanasia to relieve their families in the economic and psychological pressures, and save limited resources of society, the patients chose to die, do not feel life is a burden or tired of life, but he felt the burden of someone else, and that others dislike. (Iii) Deputy euthanasia means to allow patients who lack capacity to self-determination by the people proxy decision to euthanasia. (Iv) Discrimination against euthanasia, the crisis is the number of types of patients such as the poverty stricken or belonging to ethnic minorities, may be clever to force that euthanasia requirement, the mercy of others. Made ill patients caught in the dilemma of both the opposition between the yield, resulting in additional unnecessary fear and anxiety. The information may be heard: Death is terrible! Your best choice of euthanasia. of the slip waves, is once the euthanasia is legalized, its use will inevitably extend to other types of patients but not the dying, if not cure patients, but not incurable disease, then the risk of Alzheimer's disease or brain degradation, even those born with severe disabilities Down syndrome baby. . And so on. So, if this argument, once established, will only create panic and fear that they will be forcibly sent to euthanasia in the ranks. Therefore, I agree Frasen say, human life, merely the possibility of error, is enough to completely reject the euthanasia.
对安乐死的看法，英文版
Why there is evil.
1988年12月8日有一位荷兰首相在电视台发表演讲支持安乐死。
这位首先是 A比舒
看着新闻太少了，不知道
我要做一个ppt的演讲 希望大家给我写个开场 用英文的
good afternoon everyone. now i 'll begin my speech about xxx. i hope you can enjoy it and give me your suggestion. 这个 您给的信息太少了 没有说是关于哪方面的 只有这样说了哦 嘎嘎
对于安乐死的看法
支持··人来到这世界不容易，当然，每个人都有权利开始和结束每个人的生命，安乐死只是结束生命的一种办法，属于个人拥有的权利，所以我不反对
我只会英语，想留学荷兰。
可以吗
荷兰说英语吗
可以啊~虽然荷兰的官方语言是荷兰语但是 在欧洲 荷兰的率是仅次于英国的哦荷兰的大学都设有不尽相同的英语课程 你总可以在那到一个你喜欢的专业是有英文授课的学好英语 去荷兰生活或学习 都不语言上的障碍了祝你成功~
我是演说家仿写 演讲稿
生命的我们都知道命在上是脆弱的，生老病死是每个人都逃脱不了的命运遗憾的是，我们既没有选择生的权利，也没有选择死的权利。
从2010年开始，我就长期与肿瘤病房结缘。
肿瘤病房是我觉得待得最难受的地方，那是一个毫无生机的地方，我常常能看到光头的、瘦骨嶙峋的、眼神完全空洞的病人，哭着说：让我死去好了，让我死去好了。
我的妈妈，就在那样的地方，勇敢地与病魔作战了两年。
妈妈去世前一个月，毫无防备的脑转移，使她突然不再认得我，她只会喊着叫着，说痛。
几针吗啡打下去，即便进入了浅昏迷状态，她都仍然死死地咬着被子，甚至是手脚都被绑在病床上。
那时候我心都要碎了。
但令我更难过的，是妈妈大小便失禁的时候。
她只要能有一丝清醒，能说一句话，哪怕都不知道我是谁，她说的话都是：“我能不能直接死掉。
”我知道那是妈妈一生中最苦的时刻，一生中最没有尊严的时刻。
无奈之下，在临终病房里，我只能把止痛换成了比吗啡药效还要强80倍的芬太尼，那会使她看起来好受很多。
而用上芬太尼的结果，就是导致深度昏迷。
深度昏迷的病人，几乎属于脑死亡的状态，因为只靠输液和能量维持生命，各个器官开始快速衰竭。
在最后的时刻，病人会因为器官的衰竭导致无法呼吸，大口大口吸气，然后停止呼吸，再大口大口吸气，再停止。
那个过程，是家属很难承受的。
所以很多家属都选择在器官衰竭但尚有心跳的时候，选择拔管。
我不想为妈妈做任何生死的决定，我希望她活着。
但是现实就是，我必须为她做出我一生中第一次也是唯一一次，为她做的决定。
而那个决定，不是可以选择她生，仅仅只是可以为她选择临终镇痛方案，选择是否临终抢救，选择是否拔管。
作为女儿，签字画押的那一刻，意味着我亲手将最爱的妈妈送往死亡，这是一个死路一条的决定。
我希望另一个世界，会让她再无痛苦。
后来我常常会回想起妈妈那些痛苦的时刻，回想起她的泪水，我觉得比什么都苦。
我不想经历像妈妈那样痛苦的过程，更不希望像妈妈那样，到了最后时刻也没留一句话给我，我有太多太多的遗憾。
所以我更害怕的是，自己毫无意识地死去，我希望至少，能在最后时刻，能留一句话，给我的儿子。
说到这里，可能有的人会觉得我在鼓吹安乐死。
但事实是，在今年年初，父亲进了ICU重症监护室，我做出的是另一种选择。
那时候我在广东，父亲在湖北。
当时医生在电话里说：“如果现在插管，你爸爸或许有一线生机，但也很有可能因为插管太痛苦，在10分钟之内就没命了。
如果不插管，不可能到明天。
”因为不想放弃一丝机会，所以我立刻做了插管的决定。
第二天清早赶回老家，幸好他活着。
而另一个跟他同时进了IUC的病人，当晚死于插管。
这让我非常的后怕。
爸爸在经历了86个小时的危险期后，苏醒过来，我对他说的第一句话就是：“对不起。
”无论我对我的父母做出了怎样的选择，无论结果是生是死，我终身，都会为做出的选择而内疚和痛苦，因为没有一个人可以决定另外一个人的生死。
所以，对于同样逃脱不了生老病死的大多数人来说，我们或许终有一天，会面临两难的抉择。
一方面，走向生命终点前的挣扎，让很多人意识到有尊严的死去是多么的重要，就像因癌症去世的著名乒乓球运动员庄则栋所呼吁的那样，“能不能不要再做无谓、无可奈何的、痛苦的挣扎，使病人有尊严地加速离开?”但另一方面，如果允许安乐死，那么无论从法律、医学、伦理上，我们都很难去界定怎么样的情况才算符合安乐死的标准，而且生命的价值可能从此无处安放。
我想很长时间之内，关于安乐死的争论还会持续下去，我也给不出任何答案。
死亡并不可怕，可怕的是在走向死亡过程中，我们所承受的痛苦，以及留下的遗憾。
我希望，我们每个人都有机会去决定自己的命运。
我们不应该等到病人已经失去作决定的能力时，才由家属去做一个无论如何都会是错误的决定。
我希望所有的人都能美好地积极地活着，包括我自己。
但是，如果我有那么一天，活着已经不能再让我感觉轻松愉快，我希望我能够有选择死的权利，我希望是自己去做人生中最后一个决定，一个会让我和我的亲人永不会后悔的决定!二语言的力量语言的力量 The power of language 说到现在，大家都饿了吧。
我也饿了。
我们来聊一个有意思的话题来分散注意力。
我们来聊一聊《舌尖上的中国》吧。
这就更饿了。
今年《舌尖II》在中国热播，然后我发现一个特别神奇的现象。
很多美国主流媒体包括《华尔街日报》在内，在它的门户网站上面刊登文章抨击《舌尖上的中国II》说，这是中国用记录片的方式输出他们的政治理想和抱负。
我当时就傻了，我就纳了闷了，你们一帮吃汉堡包的命为什么要操我们满汉全席的心呢?他们为什么不能理解我们单纯的吃货的世界呢?但其实我也能理解他们。
在《华尔街日报》的理由中，他说因为《舌尖上的中国II》中大量描述了中国边疆的情况，有很多少数民族的信息，这是他们的统战要求。
可是亲爱的美国记者同学，我们是一个五十六个民族的国家，我们大家在座的很多哥们，最爱吃的就是新疆乌鲁木齐的羊肉串(方言)，对吧?在座有很多女孩最爱的就是，你知道港台的甜点是超赞的(方言)，你要不要来一块?切糕我们吃，茶叶蛋我们一买买一筐，这就是我们中国人我们爱吃好吃懂吃，这是我们的文化。
