the giver 读后感
[the giver 读后感]因为是学校功课- -只能用英文做，而且现在在台湾，老爸的破电脑居然连WORD都没有，于是来这里写代替WORD顺便说，本人英文之差可谓无敌，有语法或者拼写错误请多多指出，谢谢先吼一句：我要回家啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊T▽TThe giver读后感 Feel the feeling in your life. This is thefrist of my impression when I finish my book ——
】
帮忙写一篇英语文章（Frog Story）的读后感，大概两百字左右（Frog Story）
This story started the writer work at a logcabin in those same woods of Northern Wisconsin, somehow a tree frog that hastaken up residence in the studio keep showing. First the writer thoughtpossibly the tone of his computer sounded like other tree frogs to attractedthe frog, then because of what his doing-working on a story about globalclimate change, he realized the frog actually want to send a message to him: Wehave reached the time when we must be the adults for the planet, for the sakeof the future generations of human and for frogs.Environmental problems are becoming moreand more serious all over the world. With the development of industry andagriculture, cars make great noises and give off poisonous gas. Trees on thehills have been cut down,and waste water is being poured continuously intorivers. Furthermore,wherever we go today, we can find rubbish carelesslydisposed. The whole ecological balance of the earth is changing. Massivedestruction of environment has brought about negative effects and even poses agreat threat to man's existence.There are no more choices like the frog implied.Now we must face the situation that exists and take actions to solve ourenvironmental problems immediately. Hopefully with our efforts it can bringback a healthful environment.
帮忙写几篇英语读后感，要初二水平的
《鲁宾逊漂流记》读后感(A Review of Robinson Crusoe) This is a novel by the English author Daniel Defoe, published in 1719. It is one of the most popular adventure novels in all literature. It is the story of Bobinson Crusoe, an Englishman who is shipwrecked in a lonely tropical island. He builds himself a hut, grows his own food, and becomes self-sufficient. After 23 years he meets with a group of cannibals and rescues one of their prisoners, a young native whome he calls Friday.Crusoe and his“man”Friday become close friends, and when they are finally rescued four years later, both return to England. Robinson Crusoe was partly based on the actual deeds of Alexander Selkirk, an 18th-century Scottish sailor who spent almost five years alone on a desert island. This novel is famous for its lovely details and its expression of belief in man's ability when left alone in nature.
the awakening（觉醒） 读后感
The AwakeningKate Chopin has been considered to be a great American female writer and her reputation as major American writer has been on the increase ever since the feminist movement in what hers the awakening has been rediscovered. The novel, with its balance structure, poetic language, super use of symbols, especially its barely connotation has aroused interests of one generation after another.The aim of this thesis is to reinterpret the novel from feminist criticism has gradually become one of the mainstreams in the critical world.This is simply a story about a lonely and desperate housewife who couldn't bear her boredom and craving for young and pleasant male company, throwing away all the duty and responsibilities of a wife and mother to join her lamentable self-meditating new life. The author seems to make every attempt to justify an affair. Edna flirted outrageously with a few young men and accidentally fell in love with one of them. If awakening means falling in love with somebody else instead of your husband, someone much younger than you are, and finally failing to have the courage of getting a divorce and flying away with your lover, you'd better not wake up. Edna is extremely pathetic. Even though it is no doubted the book is well written and well received. This is by no means a joyful feminism text. I'm sorry for her husband and sorry for Robert. She doesn't worth it. But still, the book is absolutely worth reading.
求读后感
The Independent Spirit——about“ Jane Eyer” This is a story about a special and unreserved woman who has been exposed to a hostile environment but continuously and fearlessly struggling for her ideal life. The story can be interpreted as a symbol of the independent spirit. It seems to me that many readers’ English reading experience starts with Jane Eyer. I am of no exception. As we refer to the movie “Jane Eyer”, it is not surprising to find some differences because of its being filmized and retold in a new way, but the spirit of the novel remains----to be an independent person, both physically and mentally. Jane Eyer was a born resister, whose parents went off when she was very young, and her aunt，the only relative she had，treated her as badly as a ragtag. Since Jane’s education in Lowwood Orphanage began, she didn’t get what she had been expecting——simply being regarded as a common person, just the same as any other girl around. The suffers from being humiliated and devastated teach Jane to be persevering and prize dignity over anything else.As a reward of revolting the ruthless oppression, Jane got a chance to be a tutor in Thornfield Garden. There she made the acquaintance of lovely Adele and that garden’s owner, Rochester, a man with warm heart despite a cold face outside. Jane expected to change the life from then on, but fate had decided otherwise: After Jane and Rochester fell in love with each other and got down to get marry, she unfortunately came to know in fact Rochester had got a legal wife, who seemed to be the shadow following Rochester and led to his moodiness all the time ----Rochester was also a despairing person in need of salvation. Jane did want to give him a hand, however, she made up her mind to leave, because she didn’t want to betray her own principles, because she was Jane Eyer. The film has finally got a symbolist end: Jane inherited a large number of legacies and finally returned. After finding Rochester’s misfortune brought by his original mad wife, Jane chose to stay with him forever. I don’t know what others feel, but frankly speaking, I would rather regard the section that Jane began her teaching job in Thornfield as the film’s end----especially when I heard Jane’s words “Never in my life have I been awaken so happily.” For one thing, this ideal and brand-new beginning of life was what Jane had been imagining for long as a suffering person; for another, this should be what the audiences with my views hoped her to get. But the professional judgment of producing films reminded me to wait for a totally different result: There must be something wrong coming with the excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to enrich the story, but also we may see from the next transition of Jane’s life that “Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you would get.” (By Forrest Gump’s mother, in the film “Forrest Gump”) What’s more, this film didn’t end when Jane left Thornfield. For Jane Eyer herself, there should always be somewhere to realize her great ideal of being independent considering her fortitude, but for Rochester, how he can get salvation? The film gives the answer tentatively: Jane eventually got back to Rochester. In fact, when Jane met Rochester for the first time, she scared his horse and made his heel strained, to a certain extent, which meant Rochester would get retrieval because of Jane. We can consider Rochester’s experiences as that of religion meaning. The fire by his frantic wife was the punishment for the cynicism early in his life. After it, Rochester got the mercy of the God and the love of the woman whom he loved. Here we can say: human nature and divinity get united perfectly in order to let such a story accord with the requirements of both two sides. The value of this film may be due to its efforts to explore a new way for the development of humanism under the faith of religion. Life is ceaselessly changing, but our living principles remain. Firmly persisting for the rights of being independent gives us enough confidence and courage, which is like the beacon over the capriccioso sea of life. In the world of the film, we have found the stories of ourselves, which makes us so concerned about the fate of the dramatis personae. In this era of rapid social and technological change leading to increasing life complexity and psychological displacement, both physical and mental effects on us call for a balance. We are likely to find ourselves bogged down in the Sargasso Sea of information overload and living unconsciousness. It’s our spirit that makes the life meaningful. Heart is the engine of body, brain is the resource of thought, and great films are the mirrors of life. Indubitably, “Jane Eyer” is one of them. 红楼梦读后感 :宝钗的悲剧 看了很多遍的红楼,以前总是觉得林黛玉的一生是那么的凄凉,总也不忍看后几回中的黛玉焚稿,宝玉成亲.觉得那么残忍的结局,知道就够了,不想一遍遍去复习那种伤心. 前些日子看了一本清代人作的红楼续补,以前对于这种书,我总是排斥的.觉得那些人搞出一个个大团圆,或死而复生或仙境重逢之类的结局,实在是没有意义.这么粗劣的改续,无聊的紧.不过这次去图书馆,见到书架上好几个版本的这种书,抽出一本,粗略的翻了一下,却使我萌动了重读红楼结尾几章的想法. 看到黛玉的郁郁而终,依然那么难过.可待到读完,听甄世隐说着什么兰桂齐芳我不由黯然.薛宝钗这样的人物,也要像李纨一样,将一生都葬在这片冷酷的园子里么? 以前的我,是很讨厌薛的.从蜂腰桥扑蝶到最后的成亲,我一直都觉得她是一个既冷酷又自私的人.可是现在,我竟然不由不同情她了。
其实细想起来,她的悲剧也许比林的更令人叹惋. 薛宝钗家境富足,从小饱读诗书.接受的是极为全面而正统的教育.贾母总是夸她沉静宽厚.没错,这正是她从小被教育过的为人方式,也是古代女子应有的美德.甚至悲喜都不应形于颜色,否则就是不尊重.综观全书她的举止,几乎从未超出这些束缚。
只有一次宝玉将她比做杨妃令她大怒,可也只是冷冷的用一句话反讽过去.以前最恨她在蜂腰桥下陷害林的一段.现在想来,其实也并不是完全不可以理解的恶毒举动.她从小生长在皇商家庭,这种趋吉避凶的法门应该是早就深深的印在心中了吧.虽然她的做法很自私,但在她,也许认为人理所应当就该这样应对.其实她才是最可悲的人,一生都被别人的看法和所受的教育支配着.从来都不知道自己想要的是什么,没有开心也没有不开心,只是按照理所当然的道路走下去.从未得到过全心全意的爱情,也没有谁真正的关心过她.而她,也就认为世界本就如此.认为夫妻间有的不是真诚的感情而是举案齐眉的尊重;认为母女间有的不是血浓于水的亲情而是服从的孝道.这样冷酷的纲常,竟是她遵守了一生的原则,而且还毫无知觉的麻木着. 她的作为,其实并没有多少是自由的选择.她只是一个典型的循规蹈矩的服从者.她是聪慧有才的，却被教育着认为女子读书也是无用,香菱和湘云谈诗她说道一个女孩儿家,只管拿着诗作正经事讲起来,叫有学问的人听了,反笑话说不守本分的;她也熟悉剧作戏曲,却认为这些淫词巧句是不能为端庄淑女所知的,因而委婉的批评宝琴的咏古诗;她像任何人一样希望有美好的生活,但当母亲为了贾府的权势而把她嫁给痴痴傻傻的宝玉时,因为母亲告诉说她已经应承了,也就只有流泪接受.直到最后宝玉出家,她的悲剧达到高潮.即使在这时,她依然是不能由着本性而为的.王夫人说看着宝钗虽是痛哭,他端庄样儿一点不走,却倒来劝我,这是真真难得的!可想想宝钗如此人物,又这样年轻,此时想起自己的一生将如何结束,她的痛苦其实并不在黛玉焚稿之下呀!可她依然只能克制着,这是她的尊重! 与林相比,他的一生也许更为可悲,林至少还追求了自己的幸福,而且得到了一份真诚的感情,最终一死解脱了所有的痛苦.而宝钗一生愚昧而不自知而且依她的性格,终其一生,也只能是任由生活这把钝刀一点一点割掉生命吧! 可叹停机德,堪怜咏絮才.玉带林中挂, 金簪雪里埋 这几句判词,注定了薛是红楼数场悲剧中的一个.对于她的一生,作者曹雪芹应该也是叹惋的吧!
英文报道读后感
已发送文章至QQ,请采纳.
麻烦帮忙计算一下这个没写完的读后感的字数T.T
442用word计数
傲慢与偏见读后感，英文的，高一的，500词左右
英文： Love seems to be the perpetual theme all over the world. But actually what is love? For most girls in 20s, love may mean everything to them. They seek for love bravely no matter what difficulties they may face. In their eyes, love is pure or even holy. However, those are just an ideal situation, n real life; people tend to find a balance between love and property. Pride and prejudice is Austin’s great work. Through the discussion of the different marriages and love, the writer demonstrates her concept about love and marriage: love and marriage is closely associated with property and society, however, love and marriage can not only be decided by the property and social status. An ideal marriage should be based on mutual affection, respect and the same interest. She rejects the marriage based only on wealth. Different people have different ideas upon marriage. By the description and discussion of the four marriages in the novel, we can see that Austen fully expresses her views on love and marriage. Only by appreciating the marriage founded on the basis of mutual understanding and true love, but also by satirizing the marriage founded on the basis of origin and desire. The marriage based on social position and money can’t bring happiness in life. Aimless marriage and love are unpractical. Everything goes wrong for poor couples. Marriage based on wealth is not a fault. At least, it can offer us a better condition of life. Property is not everything in the life but without it, we can do nothing. This is called reality. But if you only married for wealth, you sell your liberty. The rest of your life might be miserable, and your marriage will filled with endless bitterness.Many people simply regard Pride and Prejudice as a love story, but in my opinion, this book is an illustration of the society at that time. She perfectly reflected the relation between money and marriage at her time and gave the people in her works vivid characters. The charact
傲慢与偏见的读后感
英文： Love seems to be the perpetual theme all over the world. But actually what is love? For most girls in 20s, love may mean everything to them. They seek for love bravely matter what difficulties they may face. In their eyes, love is pure or even holy. However, those are just an ideal situation, n real life; people tend to find a balance between love and property. Pride and prejudice is Austin’s great work. Through the discussion of the different marriages and love, the writer demonstrates her concept about love and marriage: love and marriage is closely associated with property and society, however, love and marriage can t only be decided by the property and social status. An ideal marriage should be based on mutual affection, respect and the same interest. She rejects the marriage based only on wealth. Different people have different ideas upon marriage. By the description and discussion of the four marriages in the vel, we can see that Austen fully expresses her views on love and marriage. Only by appreciating the marriage founded on the basis of mutual understanding and true love, but also by satirizing the marriage founded on the basis of origin and desire. The marriage based on social position and money can’t bring happiness in life. Aimless marriage and love are unpractical. Everything goes wrong for poor couples. Marriage based on wealth is not a fault. At least, it can offer us a better condition of life. Property is not everything in the life but without it, we can do nothing. T is called reality. But if you only married for wealth, you sell your liberty. The rest of your life might be miserable, and your marriage will filled with endless bitterness.Many people simply regard Pride and Prejudice as a love story, but in my opinion, t book is an illustration of the society at that time. She perfectly reflected the relation between money and marriage at her time and gave the people in her works vivid characters. The characters have their own peralities. Mrs. Bennet is a woman who makes great efforts to marry off her daughters. Mr. Bingley is a friendly young man, but friend, Mr. Darcy, is a very proud man who seems to always feel superior. Even the five daughters in Bennet family are very different. Jane is simple, innocent and never speaks evil of others. Elizabeth is a clever girl who always has her own opinion. Mary likes reading classic books. (Actually she is a pedant.) Kitty doesn’t have her own opinion but likes to follow her sister, Lydia. Lydia is a girl who follows exotic things, handsome man, and is somehow a little profligate. When I read the book, I can always find the same peralities in the society now. That is why I think this book is indeed the representative of the society in Britain in the 18th century. The family of gentleman in the countryside is Jane Austen’s favourite topic. But this little topic can reflect big problems. It concludes the stratum situation and economic relationships in Britain in her century. You can find these from the very beginning of this book. The first sentence in this book is impressive. It reads: “It is a truth well known to all the world that an unmarried man in possession of a large fortune must be in need of a wife”. The undertone is very clear: the foundation of the marriage at that time is not emotion but possession. People always think that Austen was an expert at telling love stories. In fact, the marriage in her book is not the result of love, but the result of economic needs. After reading this book, I know the truth is that a poor woman must be in need of a husband, a wealthy man. I couldn’t forget how eager Mrs. Bennet wants to marry off her daughters. If you want to know why she is so crazy about these things, I must mention the situation in Britain at that time. Only the eldest had the privilege of inheriting his father’s possessions. Younger sons and daughters who are used to luxurious lives have no choice but marry a man or woman in possession of a large fortune to continue their comfortable lives. Thus, we can see that getting married is a way to become wealthier, particularly for women without many possessions. Jane Austen told us that money and possession determined everything, including marriage and love in her century. In “Pride and Prejudice”, the sister of Mr. Bingley strongly opposed his plan of marrying Jane because the Bennets don’t have many possessions and their social positions are much lower than them. From this, we can see there are a lot of obstacles for a not very rich woman to marry a wealthy husband. The society, the relatives would not allow them to get married. In modern society, although the marriages of economic needs have decreased rapidly, the concept of “money determines everything” is still rooted in some people’s mind. A lot of parents try hard to interfere their children’s marriages. Education background, possessions, jobs remains the main reason that may influence one’s marriage. Marry for money is still a big problem in our society. We can’t help thinking: can money determine everything? Austen left this problem for us to think. The genius of Jane Austen lies in this perfect simplicity, the simplicity that reflects big problems. Although Austen was only 21 when she wrote “Pride and Prejudice”, her sharp observation of social lives makes the style of this book surprisingly mature and lively. The plots in her works are always very natural. The development of the plot is as inevitable as a problem in mathematics. I think the depth of Pride and Prejudice is the reason that makes this book prominent and classic. Today, her book still can be the guide telling us the economic relationships both at her time and in modern time.中文：这本书，在初中时已经接触过了。
只是当时只是看到了男女主角之间的感情纠葛，起起落落的心情，让人沉浸在其中，几年之后，再次翻阅，别有一番风味。
班纳特家有5个女儿均未出嫁，而班纳特太太是一个虚荣心十足的女人，将每个女儿嫁出去是她这一生唯一的大事却从不费心管教女儿的举止，而班纳特先生是个顾家的老绅士，却放任妻子和女儿的不得体行为，宁愿躲进图书室寻求平静。
简·班纳特是班纳特家的大女儿，容貌美丽、性情温柔、沉静；伊莉沙白·班纳特是班纳特家的二女儿，个性活泼大方、聪慧与美貌并俱；三女儿容貌不若其它姊妹出色，因此便在品德及知识上用功，但也造成她的自大态度；排行第四的个性浮华，与么妹丽迪雅最热忠跳舞，举止常失礼而不自知；么女儿爱慕虚荣、注重享乐、跳舞和与军官斗闹取乐是她生活的唯一目的。
有一天他们家附近的搬来了一个有钱的单身男子彬格莱·，他是一个个性温和、做人真诚不拘泥小节的富家青年，在一个宴会彬格莱却恋上了班纳特家的大女儿简，与简·班纳特相互爱慕；而彬格莱的好朋友·费茨个性拘谨严肃，不善言词常给人自大傲慢的印象，在不知不觉中喜欢上班纳特家的二女儿伊莉沙白，但是因为班纳特一家本身并不是得体的家族令这两段恋情受到障碍，伊莉沙白一开始就对傲慢的存有偏见，主要就是描述他们这段关系的转变过程。
书中的时代背景会造就许多不同的爱情观：“彬格莱先生仪表堂堂，大有绅士风度，而且和颜悦色，没有拘泥做作的气习。
达西立刻引起全场的注意，因为他身材魁伟，眉清目秀，举止高贵，于是他进场不到五分钟，大家都纷纷传说他每年有一万磅的收入。
男宾们都称赞他的一表人才，女宾们都说他比彬格莱先生漂亮得多。
”人们就是以财富来衡量一个人的。
在达西与伊莉沙白的年代是趋于保守的，也会有贵族与平民的上的障碍；相较于现代这样的情形就会比较少发生。
在我看法里我认为爱情是很美好的，两颗心的距离并不一定会因为形体的接近或分开而有所改变，青春和爱情，都是天底下最容易消逝的东西；一个女人在一生中能够被一个男人深深爱过，是一种怎样的幸福呢
或者说，一个女人在一生中错过一个深深爱她的男人，是一种怎样的遗憾
傲慢和偏见，就属于人类弱点中最常见的两种。
而人性又太容易被扭曲、被异化，一不小心，或一旦陷入盲目，失去公正和理智，被感情所操纵，就会出毛病，伊莉沙白和达西也只是一个代表而已。
而出身、财产、地位、教养、一旦沾上上流的边，就容易染上傲慢的毛病，对贫穷、低下、粗俗的人瞧不上眼；而地位低、财产少的人，出于人类的一种自尊心，则以偏见对抗骄傲的优越者，这自然是另一种被扭曲的傲慢。
不过《傲慢与偏见》与另一部《爱玛》中都以婚姻为其中心议题。
就书中的人物而言，婚姻并非意味着男女间无法控制的热情而是双方与社会间的契约产物。
小说人物全然融入其社会现实，依循社会规则，谱出故事情节。
由于明白婚姻关系可提供阶级提升与经济改善的机会，财力与社会地位为决定结婚对象的相关条件。
本文以社会女性主义观点切入，检视奥斯汀的社会背景，探索社会环境如何影响女性在面临婚姻时，内心的焦虑与挣扎。
就社会女性主义者而言，物质环境为塑造女性婚姻意识的决定因素。
事实上，婚姻，就小说人物而言，为一个阶级交换与经济交流的市场。
为了达成结婚的目的，女性人物擅于把自己转化成商品，展示其外貌与才艺，吸引男性目光。
此一时期女性受到社会价值的鼓励，利用其女性特质来赢得婚姻伴侣。
然而，奥斯汀的女性人物在面临婚姻伴侣的抉择时往往呈现对婚姻无意识的不安。
爱情是一条主线，然而婚姻与爱情还是有差别的，其中一点诚实，男女主人公就太缺少了。
正因为如此才使得女主角不安。
人，总是先入为主，达西先生傲慢、无礼的样子早已进入伊丽莎白的头脑，再加上骗子韦翰利用了自己巧妙的奉承能力以及一付”讨人喜欢”的仪表，迷住了伊丽莎白，不停地为自己洗刷冤情，中伤达西。
不可否认，韦翰长着一张英俊的脸，表面上也装得非常”绅士”。
使得伊丽莎白完全相信了韦翰的花言巧语，可能于伊丽莎白的年纪有很大的关联，即使她是家中最居理智的女儿，毕竟年轻，对于一个人是好是坏，还只是看浅表的。
最主要的可能是丽萃太过于在乎她在别人眼中的形象，她非常不希望在别人眼里看来她是一个无知而虚荣，又没有教养的女人，可她也只是一个处在那种时代的而不甘于做一个配件的女人而已，她希望的伴侣能在心灵上与之共鸣，对于这个人的品格的要求超过了财富的要求，这一点是值得赞赏的，毕竟是在有一个爱钱的母亲的教育下长大的。
不过对于这样一个母亲，她还是感到了自卑，才会在面对韦翰的谎言时，盲目的相信那个“高高在上”的达西是个卑鄙的人，从而使自己在他面前时的自卑心得到解脱。
不过幸运的是伊丽莎白没有被这些真正的蒙住双眼。
傲慢与偏见，在书中是男女主角爱情上的障碍，但在现实社会中也是人们相互之间交流的障碍，更是在正确对待自己，对待事物上的绊脚石。
人的缺陷太多，首先是心灵上的陷阱。
要想在一生中成一番事业，无论是知识、教养、还是爱情、事业，都需要同自己心灵的种种浅浮的陷阱或阴影做斗争，经过各种误解和长时间的反复的认识过程，慢慢由心灵克服各自弱点和毛病，而走向开放、洒脱、自由的必然结果。
扰扰尘世，做人不易；茫茫人海，佳偶难见。
然而没有爱情不要勉强人结婚，只要人品正直，追求美德，不放松向喜之心，不苟且、贪图一时之利欲，追求两心之和谐、相应，运用彼此的智慧，克服心灵上的缺点，终得如愿以偿。
人和人之间的相处总会有一些小小的摩擦，而这些摩擦，往往就是自己内心中所潜藏的弱点或毛病，要和别人能够更愉快的生活，就必须先了解到自己的缺点，并磨去他，其次是了解别人的内心，最后再互相深入彼此，如此一来，你会发现到社会上每一件人、事、物都是如此美好、光明，更进一步激发出你内心深处的感动，发挥出自己的专长去替这个社会、这个国家、这个世界服务，毕竟我门是万物之长，如果人们不再用心去关怀身边的人，不再去付出自己的一臂之力，那么还有谁要去完成这个任务呢
所以从现在开始，我们就应该将自己原先所存有的毛病给除去，换上一个全新的自我，为崭新的未来打拚吧
杜勒奥斯丁的这部作品，你会觉得它不仅仅是一部爱情小说，还是一部世态小说。
他的主要篇幅时谈婚论嫁，中心故事是本内太太嫁女儿，主要相关人物确实不过三四户人家，有贵族上古人家的有钱老爷，太爷，少爷，小姐，太太，以及军队里的亲戚朋友，还有当时社会的牧师。
故事的情节是通过舞会，会访亲友，婚姻，市集，教堂，宴会等场合串连的，最后本内太太的五个女儿嫁出去三个，其余两个也适得其所。
另外在不知不觉中还解决了邻居大女儿的燃眉之急。
在《傲慢与偏见》中，婚姻恋爱当事人对事件的态度，认识以及相关人物的反应，看到当时中产阶级社会普遍的世态风气。
诸如对社会人生至关重要的婚姻与财产二者之间的关系。
十七世纪资产阶级革命之后英国封建等阶级制度的瓦解过程中社会阶级关系和人际关系的变化，妇女的觉醒等 在众多人物中，不论是主人公伊丽莎白，达西还是陪衬任务，都有自己独特的特色，让读者对“人性”有了更清楚地了解。
伊丽莎白的独立不羁、蔑视权贵、敢做敢为、秀外慧中；达西的冷峻，高贵傲慢；简的善良客人；殡礼先生的平易近人，诚实；魏肯的狡猾奸诈，心狠手辣；本内特太太的实力，无聊等等向读者展现了一个个鲜活的角色。
这也是小说思想内容的本质—：“对人性最彻底的了解” 这一部看似又是一个“灰姑娘”的故事，但联系他的历史背景来看，它确实反映了当时英国平民资产阶级地位的升迁；同时也正是对当时正在进行的法国大革命中自由，平等呼声的一个遥远的曲折回应。
男主人公的傲慢女主人公的偏见都带有明显的阶级性，他们在爱情上遭逢的种种挫折，并非出于彼此偶然的误会，或有小人从中拨弄，而是由于处在不同阶级地位的双方之间横亘着一条无可回避的鸿沟。
现在社会，虽然提倡男女平等，自由恋爱，但在很多时候门第祖望，家事背景对恋爱双方还是有很多影响，如果你是一个很普通的少女，可以有平平淡淡的爱情，也可以有浪漫壮烈的爱情，只要能坚持自我，洁身自好，实实在在的工作，一定会找到属于自己的真爱。
不仅仅在爱情方面，爱做人上，我们更应该凭自己的人格魅力和个人优良品质赢得众人的尊重，倾慕。
—这是小说最重要表明的“对人性最透彻的了解”的真正目的。
