英语阅读书虫系列《 公正 》读后感100字以上.初一水平（悬赏+50）
He sings a song of the younger world, which is the song of the pack. (Chapter VII The Sounding of the Wild) When the last sentence vanished from my eyes, I can still perceive an echo of a song - a wild song, which knocks up my dizzy mind that always cheerfully sink into the so-called civilized world without questioning. Wild, is no longer a symbol of the law of jungle but a headspring where streams out love, passion, bravery, loyalty, friendship, venture, competition and tolerance all these virtues can easily be found in the Call of the Wild. Jack London (1876-1916) is a worldwide renowned novelist. His stories successfully reflect the contradictory views of man’s nature and destiny in and against the wild, and his fight to survive notion has gained him and his works timeless popularity, particularly, the Call of the Wild It tells a story of a gigantic dog, named Buck, who is stolen from a rich and comfortable home and forced to learn to survive as an Alaskan sled dog. Buck, at first, is too savage for the company of man until he coincidently encounters his beloved master-kindhearted John Thornton. Finally, John’s incidental death breaks Buck’s last tie to the man and drives him into his long-desired wild with his pack. In the story, Buck and John simply adopt themselves to answer the call of the wild. When it comes to Buck’s mind that one day he will eventually leave John- his master, all he wants to do is just to help him finish the gold-rush-trip. He from then on, night and day, never put a halt, in desperation, he burst into long stretch of flight, did not to stay him (John)… (Chapter VII The Sounding of The Wild) Buck wished to remember John’s image forever, he for two days and nights never left camp, never let Thornton out of his sight. He followed him about at his work, watched him while saw him into blankets at night and out of them in the morning… (Chapter VII) When I read these words I just could not hold my tears bursting. Can a real man devote himself to loyalty and friendship in such a way? On the other hand, John Thornton is not only a dog-lover but also a brave and venturous man. He is so straightforward and simple that makes him an accommodating man. Once he firmly roots a goal into his heart, it seems that nothing could prevent him from accomplishing it except death. I do not know whether the persistence is the most vital element to make a man successful, but what I know is that you are not far away from success once you occupy it.
关于英文版《公正》的读后感
谁能给我一篇《公正》的读后感，读后感要用英语写哦，它的作者是TimVicary，陈莉译，小说很短的，急用~~~~~~~~~~~
书虫公正英语读后感梗概也行 各位救救我啊 100以上就行 拜托了
我也是看这本啊，我放弃找了。
打算把简介的用Google翻译一下算了，不过Google准确度还OK
公正该如何做是好 读后感
《公正，该如何是好》读后感如果一个人的死能换来多数人的生，你会牺牲那个人而让自己和同伴们活下去吗
如果改进汽车的致命缺陷能挽救很多人的生命，你会愿意为此付出高额的改装费用吗
如果一项合同与传统道德相冲突，法院判决合同无效，你会认为法院的判决是公正的吗
书中的问题异常尖锐。
在这个日益物质化的年代，我们的行为选择总在人性和物质性之间摇摆不定。
当我们遇到生死抉择的时候，我们常常因为尊重人的基本权利而违背利益最大化的理性原则，因此我们才认为，19世纪遇险的英国船员为了存活下去杀死并吃掉一个病弱的奴仆，是有悖人道的。
但是，我们口口声声说个人的生命权利至上时，为什么像福特汽车这样的企业却会给生命贴上价格标签
如果我们尊重个人的权利，但为什么大多数人又会反对同性婚姻
我们的社会、我们的思潮、我们的正义观，正陷入尴尬的两难选择当中。
我们甚至怀疑法律是否公正，因为法律无法回避个人的道德判断，无法做到中立。
读者文摘上有一篇名为《世界上五大无话回答的问题》，第一个便是失控的电车正在行驶，迎面的轨道上有5个人，灾难已不可避免，轨道上还有一个人，只要撞上他便可以挽救5个人的性命。
你会怎么做
道德判定应该依据行为的结果，还是行为本身
这是道德核心问题，决定我们对公正的定义专政家认为，只有能够维护经济稳定和政治平稳，用残忍方法对待几个反动者根本不算什么不道德。
如同马基雅里《君主论》中倡导的：“只要结果是好的，可以原谅一切手段”。
所以如果能救5个人，就杀了那无辜的人吧
前段时间人们对小悦悦事件，老人跌倒扶不扶这类事件议论很多，认为中国世风日下。
其实并不是这样的，这是由于责任感大于价值观。
旁观者与当局者他们对一件事选择完全不同，这是被迫选择和自主选择的差别，不关乎价值观而在于责任感。
在没有绝对责任感的逼迫下，任何人都可以对恶姑息，视而不见，因为他不必面对良心的责问。
这是一种可预见的非理性。
所以想要获得旁观者支持，最重要不是申诉你的原则，而是拉他入局。
所以桑德尔教授说，哲学是个坏东西，它会使我们变成坏公民。
因为哲学会教化我们，使我们原本熟视无睹的情景变得陌生。
风险便在这里，我们的所有由此已与过去完全不同了，过度沉溺其中，便会伤到自己。
因此我们有一种逃避方法叫怀疑主义，并不彻底解决问题，坚持个人原则，对别人原则不发表见解，不去推理思考而是逃避。
康德说过：“怀疑主义是人类的安息之地。
”其实不是的，怀疑主义只是简单默许，鲁莽推理便足以让它溃不成军。
因为我们生活于其中，便必须去推理，尽管这些问题已被讨论了太多次，太多次。
《公正》这本书便是唤醒我们的鲁莽推理。
何不看看自己能在哲学这条路上走多远
或许人文科学不能助我们登上火星，但至少可以让我们在地球上生活得更舒服一些。
